Article contents
The spatial configuration of class solidarity in London's West End 1792–1939
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2009
Extract
For more than two hundred years after the Glorious Revolution, the British aristocracy gained control of ‘every aspect of government, both executive and legislative. They dominated the Cabinet, the highest ranks of the armed forces, the civil service and, to a lesser extent, the judiciary’. During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries there was a shift in their centre of gravity from that of a rural elite, to a group whose influence was mediated increasingly through the manipulation of the levers of power embedded in the urban system. This urbanization of their consciousness was coupled with, and partly responsible for, a scale jump in their collectivity. By 1850 it was no longer true that ‘society’ owed its allegiance to the local ‘county’ circles. Bush suggests that for the aristocratic class there developed in the nineteenth century a nationwide, shared ethos and culture. This was fostered on the proverbial playing fields of the nascent public schools, but it is the thesis of this paper that the spatiality of the West End of London was also a major factor in what amounts to a process of class formation for the disparate social factions which were eventually moulded into a coalition of the British ruling classes. Such was the binding quality of the social cement manufactured in the West End that it was able to withstand the aggressive solvent of industrial capitalism for something approaching a century.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
Notes
1 Beckett, J.V., The Aristocracy in England 1660–1914 (1986), 10.Google Scholar
2 Bush, M.L., The English Aristocracy: A Comparative Synthesis (1984), 75.Google Scholar This stands in sharp contrast to a recent attempt to write a regional geography of industrial culture: Langton, J., ‘The industrial revolution and the regional geography of England’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, new series, 9 (1984), 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Soja, E.W., ‘The socio-spatial dialectic’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70 (1980), 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Soja, E.W., ‘The spatiality of social life: towards a transformative retheorisation’ in Social Relations and Spatial Structures, eds Gregory, D. and Urry, J. (1985), 90–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Lefebvre, H., La Production de l'Espace (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Power, M.J., ‘East and west in early-modern London’ in Wealth and Power in Tudor England, eds Scarisbrick, J.J. et al. (1978), 167–85Google Scholar; Power, M.J., ‘John Stow and his London’, Journal of Historical Geography, 11 (1985), 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Power, M.J., ‘The social topography of Restoration London’ in The Making of the Metropolis: London 1500–1700, eds Beier, A.L. and Finlay, R. (1986), 199–223.Google Scholar
7 In this paper the ‘City of London’ refers to the commercial core, which was also a separate administrative unit. On London's private palaces see Pearce, D.J., London's Mansions: the Palatial Houses of the Nobility (1986).Google Scholar
8 Stone, L., ‘The residential development of the West End of London in the seventeenth century’ in After the Reformation, ed. Malament, B.C. (1980), 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Lee, S., A Collection of the Names of the Merchants Living in and About the City of London (1677).Google Scholar
10 Vance, J., This Scene of Man: the Role and Structure of the City in the Geography of Western Civilization (1977).Google Scholar
11 Bush, , The English Aristocracy, 74.Google Scholar
12 The dates given refer to the commencement of construction. See Chancellor, E.B., The History of the Squares of London (1907)Google Scholar, and Rude, G., Hanoverian London 1714–1808 (1971).Google Scholar
13 Rasmussen, S.E., London: the Unique City (1948), ch. 9.Google Scholar
14 Summerson, J., Georgian London (1988), 26.Google Scholar
15 Schwarz, L.D., ‘Social class and social geography: the middle classes in London at the end of the eighteenth century’, Social History, 7 (1982), 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Ibid., 172.
17 Harvey, D.W., The Urbanization of Capital (1985), 155.Google Scholar
18 Harvey, D.W., Consciousness and the Urban Experience: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (1985), 213.Google Scholar
19 Gough, B. Worsley, Fashions in London (1952), 47.Google Scholar
20 Sheppard, F.H.W. (ed.), Survey of London, Volume XXXIX: the Grosvenor Estate in Mayfair. Part I: General History (1977).Google Scholar
21 Ibid., 84–6.
22 The Duke of Westminster rescinded his objection to professional consulting rooms and offices in 1934. The resident population of Mayfair fell from approximately 17,000 in 1841 to 4,345 in 1961. See Sheppard, , Survey of London, Volume XXXIX, 93–102Google Scholar, and Kennedy, C., Mayfair: a Social History (1986).Google Scholar
23 Summerson, Georgian London.
24 Olsen, D.J., Town Planning in London: the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries (1964)Google Scholar; Olsen, D.J., The Growth of Victorian London (1976).Google Scholar
25 Olsen, , The Growth of Victorian London, 162–9.Google Scholar
26 From Trollope's The Small House at Allington, quoted in Weinreb, B. and Hibbert, C., The London Encyclopaedia (1983), 599.Google Scholar
27 Booth, C., Life and Labour of the People in London. First Series, Poverty, Volume 2: Streets and Population Classified (1902).Google Scholar
28 Including institutions such as the Foundling Hospital, which developed its estate, comprising Mecklenburgh and Brunswick Squares, from 1790 to 1830.
29 Thompson, F.M.L., Hampstead: Building a Borough, 1650–1964 (1974), 73.Google Scholar
30 Harvey, , The Urbanization of Capital, 213.Google Scholar
31 Summerson, , Georgian London, 81–4.Google Scholar
32 Hobhouse, H., Thomas Cubitt: Master Builder (1971).Google Scholar
33 Sheppard, F.H.W., London 1808–1870: the Infernal Wen (1971), 106.Google Scholar
34 Booth, , Life and Labour of the People in London, 17 vols (1902–1903).Google Scholar
35 Ibid.
36 A further commentary on these districts is given in Cox, A., The Landlord's and Tenant's Guide (1853).Google Scholar
37 Sheppard, , Survey of London, Volume XXXIX, 90–1.Google Scholar
38 H., and Evans, M., The Party that Lasted 100 Days. The Late Victorian Season: a Social Study (1976), 28.Google Scholar
39 Davidoff, L., The Best Circles: Society, Etiquette and the Season (1973), 15–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Guttsman, W.L., The British Political Elite (1963), 158.Google Scholar
41 Summerson, , Georgian London, 121–4.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., 84.
43 Bush, , The English Aristocracy, 75.Google Scholar
44 Jones, G. Stedman, Outcast London: a Study in the Relationship Between Classes in Victorian Society (1971), ch. 2.Google Scholar
45 Thompson, F.M.L., English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century (1963), 336.Google Scholar
46 Nevill, R., London Clubs: their History and Treasures (1911).Google Scholar
47 Besant, W., London in the Nineteenth Century (1909), 259.Google Scholar
48 Ibid., 20.
49 Thompson, English Landed Society, ch. 10.
50 Pumphrey, R.E., ‘The introduction of industrialists into the British peerage: a study in adaptation of a social institution’, American Historical Review, 65 (1959), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rubinstein, W.D., Elites and the Wealthy in Modern British History (1987).Google Scholar
51 Whitehand, J.W.R., ‘The changing urban landscape: the case of London's high-class residential fringe’, Geographical Journal, 154 (1988), 351–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Dennis, R., English Industrial Cities of the Nineteenth Century: a Social Geography (1984), ch. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 Atkins, P.J., The Directories of London 1677–1977 (1990, forthcoming), ch. 3.Google Scholar
54 Atkins, P.J., ‘Eighteenth century London directories’, Factotum, 28 (1989), 12–16.Google Scholar
55 Beckett, , The Aristocracy in England, 41.Google Scholar
56 In the 1851 census 33,000 people in Britain ‘of rank or property’ were not engaged in any occupation. His investigation of the court pages of the press counted 4,000 fashionable arrivals in 1841, although some were for the same families. Sheppard, , Survey of London, Volume XXXIX, 91, 104.Google Scholar
57 Boyle, E., Boyle's Fashionable Court and Country Guide and Town Visiting Directory (1813), iii.Google Scholar
58 Malcolmson, P., ‘Getting a living in the slums of Victorian Kensington’, London Journal, 1 (1975), 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Hampstead, St Pancras, St Marylebone, Paddington, Kensington, Chelsea, St George Hanover Square, SS Margaret and John Westminster, St Martin in the Fields, St James Westminster, St Anne Soho, St Paul Covent Garden, St Luke, Strand, Bloomsbury, St Clement Danes, and St George Martyr.
60 Shaw, G. and Wild, M.T., ‘Retail patterns in the Victorian city’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, new series, 4 (1979), 278–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atkins, P.J., ‘The Covent Garden ladies’, Factotum, 30 (1989), 10–11Google Scholar; Nevill, London Clubs; Carter, H., An Introduction to Urban Historical Geography (1983), 164–7.Google Scholar
61 Olsen, , The Growth of Victorian London, 83.Google Scholar
62 Ibid., 82–4.
63 Saunders, A., Regent's Park: a Study of the Development of the Area from 1086 to the Present Day (1969).Google Scholar
64 Tyburnia was occupied by wealthy merchants, professional men and MPs. Cox, , The Landlord's and Tenant's Guide, 212.Google Scholar
65 Reeder, D.A., ‘A theatre of suburbs: some patterns of development in west London, 1801–1911’ in The Study of Urban History, ed. Dyos, H.J. (1968), 253–71.Google Scholar
66 Sheppard, F.H.W. (ed.) Survey of London, Volume XXXVII: North Kensington (1973), 232–3.Google Scholar
67 This square reached its peak in 1860 and declined thereafter.
68 Although there were still 600 addresses listed here as late as 1920.
69 Many colonial administrators made their home in Paddington and Bayswater. Garside, P.L., ‘West End, East End: London, 1890–1940’ in Metropolis 1890–1940, ed. Sutcliffe, A. (1984), 221–58.Google Scholar
70 Webber, M., ‘Order in diversity: community without propinquity’ in Cities and Space, ed. Wingo, L. (1963), 23–54.Google Scholar
71 Knox, P., Urban Social Geography: an Introduction (1982), 44.Google Scholar
72 Besant, , London in the Nineteenth Century, 230.Google Scholar
73 Gough, Worsley, Fashions in London, 35.Google Scholar
74 Giddens, A., Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75 Spring, D., European Landed Elites in the Nineteenth Century (1977).Google Scholar
76 Summerson, Georgian London, ch. 7.
77 Thompson, , English Landed Society, 106.Google Scholar
78 Searle, M., Turnpikes and Toll-Bars (1930), volume 2, 714.Google Scholar
79 Olsen, , Town Planning in London, 145.Google Scholar
80 Rude, , Hanoverian London, 43Google Scholar; Jones, Stedman, Outcast London, 291–5.Google Scholar
81 Ley, D., A Social Geography of the City (1983), 161.Google Scholar
82 Giddens, A., The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984).Google Scholar
83 Sheppard, , Survey of London, Volume XXXIX, 90–1.Google Scholar
84 Giddens, A., A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Power, Property and the State (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85 Cooke, P., ‘Class practices as regional markers: a contribution to labour geography’, in Gregory, D. and Urry, J., Social Relations and Spatial Structures, 213–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thrift, N.J., ‘The geography of nineteenth century class formation’ in Class and Space: the Making of Urban Society, eds Thrift, N.J. and Williams, P. (1987), 25–50.Google Scholar
86 Thrift, N.J., ‘On the determination of social action in space and time’, Society and Space, 1 (1983), 23–57.Google Scholar
87 P. Cooke, ‘Locality, economic restructuring and world development’ in Localities: the Changing face of Urban Britain, ed. idem. (1989), 1–44.
- 14
- Cited by