Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:26.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The public's view of public health in mid-Victorian Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Michael Sigsworth  and
Michael Worboys
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What did the public think about public health reform in mid-Victorian Britain? Historians have had a lot to say about the sanitary mentality and actions of the middle class, yet have been strangely silent about the ideas and behaviour of the working class, who were the great majority of the public and the group whose health was mainly in question. Perhaps there is nothing to say. The working class were commonly referred to as ‘the Great Unwashed’, purportedly ignorant and indifferent on matters of personal hygiene, environmental sanitation and hence health. Indeed, the writings of reformers imply that the working class simply did not have a sanitary mentality. However, the views of sanitary campaigners should not be taken at face value. Often propaganda and always one class's perception of another, in the context of the social apartheid in Britain's cities in the mid-nineteenth century, sanitary campaigners' views probably reveal more about middle-class anxieties than the actual social and physical conditions of the poor. None the less many historians still use such material to portray working-class life, but few have gone on to ask how public health reform was seen and experienced ‘from below’. Historians of public health have tended to portray the urban working class as passive victims who were rescued by enlightened middle-class reformers. This seems to be borne out at the political level where, unlike with other popular movements of the 1840s and after, there is little evidence of working-class participation in, or support for, the public health movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 237 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to acknowledge the help of the following: John Benson, Bill Luckin, John Pickstone and Dorothy Porter for comments on earlier drafts; two anonymous referees and the editor for valuable advice in refining the paper; and the Wellcome Trust for the support of the research on which it is based.

References

1 On attempts to recover the patient's view of health care see: Porter, R., ‘The patient's view: doing medical history from below’, Theory and Society, 14 (1985), 175–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2 On the public health movement see: Brockington, C. F., Public Health in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1965);Google Scholar Lewis, R.A., Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement, 1832–1854 (London, 1952)Google Scholar; Frazer, W.M., The History of English Public Health, 1834–1939 (London, 1950)Google Scholar; Hume, C.H., ‘The public health movement’, in Ward, J.T. (ed.), Popular Movements, c1830–1850 (London, 1970), 183–200;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Kearns, G., ‘Private property and public health reform in England, 1830–70’, Social Science Medicine, 26 (1988), 187–99;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lawrence, C., ‘Sanitary reformers and the medical profession in Victorian England’, International Congress of the History of Medicine (Tokyo, 1981), 145–75.Google Scholar

3 Walton, J.K. and Wilcox, A. (eds), Low Life and Moral Improvement in Mid-Victorian England: Liverpool through the Journalism of Hugh Shimmin (Leicester, 1991).Google Scholar

4 Mort, F., Dangerous Sexualities: Medico-Moral Politics in England since 1830 (London, 1987), 11–62.Google Scholar

5 Hume, , ‘Public health’, passim.Google Scholar

6 Typical of the studies found in ‘city histories’ is: Shaw, C., ‘Aspects of public health’, in Binfield, C. et al. , The History of the City of Sheffield, 1843–1993: Society (Sheffield, 1993), 100–17Google Scholar, and Foster, B. (ed.), Living and Dying: A Picture of Hull in the Nineteenth Century (Hull, 1984).Google Scholar On the role of Medical Officers of Health, see: Hardy, A., The Epidemic Streets: Infectious Disease and the Rise of Preventive Medicine, 1856–1900 (Oxford, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Wohl, A.S., Endangered Lives: Public Health in Victorian Britain (London, 1983), 77–8.Google Scholar This neglect of the ‘public’ in public health reform has been accentuated in recent historical work, where it has been shown that many sanitary improvements were not made specifically to improve health at all but for commercial and amenity reasons. The implications are that programmes were shaped wholly by the interplay of industrial, political and other vested middle-class interests. See: Hamlin, C., ‘Muddling in Bumbledom: on the enormity of large sanitary projects in four British towns, 1855–1885’, Victorian Studies, 32 (1988), 55–83.Google Scholar

8 For a stimulating review of recent work in the history of urban medicine see: Fisseli, M., ‘Health in the city: putting the pieces together’, Urban History, 19 (1992), 251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 This is beginning to change, especially for Britain in the first half of the nineteenth century, see: Hamlin, C., ‘State medicine in Britain’, in Porter, D. (ed.), The History of Public Health and the Modern State (Amsterdam, 1994), 132–64, and the editor's ‘Introduction’, 1–45.Google Scholar

10 Report of the Sanatory Committee of the Bradford Woolsorters (Bradford, 1854).Google Scholar

11 ‘The first address from the Committee’, Wigan Working-classes' Public Health Association (Wigan, 1848).Google Scholar The Association's motto was, ‘We can be useful no longer than we are well’. We would like to thank Joan Mottram for this reference.

12 Pickstone, J.V., ‘Dearth, dirt and fever epidemics: rewriting the history of public health, 1750–1850’, in Ranger, T. and Slack, P. (eds), Epidemics and Ideas (Cambridge, 1992), 126–46.Google Scholar

13 Hamlin, C., ‘Predisposing causes and public health in early nineteenth century medical thought’, Social History of Medicine, 5 (1992), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14 Parliamentary Papers, 1863, Fifth Annual Report of the Medical Officer of Health to the Privy Council, for 1862, ‘The Cotton Famine’, 16–21; also see: Appendix V, ‘Report by Dr Edward Smith F.R.S. on the Nourishment of Distressed Operatives’, 320. Parliamentary Papers. 1864, xxvii, Sixth Annual Report of the Medical Officer of Health to the Privy Council, for 1863, II. Conditions of Nourishment, 11–17; also see: Appendix VI, ‘Report by Dr Edward Smith F.R.S. on the Food of the Poorer Labouring Classes in England’, 216–329. Luckin, B., ‘Death and survival in the City: approaches to the history of disease’, Urban History Yearbook (1980)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Simon, J., Elementary Requisites for Popular Healthiness (London, 1865).Google Scholar

15 Pickstone suggests that the Chadwickian reduction and its acceptance can be explained by reference to how the context in which Chadwick and his medical advisers worked (legislation, national pressure group politics, political economy) allowed them to take disease out of the economy. Pickstone, J. V., ‘Dearth, dirt’, 133–44.Google Scholar

16 Much of our evidence is drawn from Sigsworth, M.F., ‘Cholera in the large towns of the East and West Riding of Yorkshire, 1848–1893’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, CNAA, 1991).Google Scholar On the 1831–32 cholera epidemic see: Morris, R.J., Cholera, 1832 (London, 1976);Google Scholar Durey, M.J., The Return of the Plague: British Society and the Cholera 1831–32 (Dublin, 1979).Google Scholar On the later epidemics see: Kearns, G., Historical Geography and Urban Epidemics: Cholera in London, 1848–49 (Liverpool, 1985);Google Scholar Luckin, B., ‘The last catastrophe: cholera in London, 1866’, Medical History, 21 (1977), 32–42;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Luckin, B., Pollution and Control: A Social History of the Thames (Bristol, 1986).Google Scholar The seminal work in this field was written by Asa Briggs and it is interesting how many of his questions have still to be answered. See: Briggs, A., ‘Cholera and society in the nineteenth century’, Past and Present, 19 (1961), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Hardy, A., ‘Urban famine or urban crisis? Typhus in the Victorian city’, Medical History, 32 (1988), 401–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

18 We have not at this stage made extensive use of working-class biographies, but intend to do so in future work. See: Vincent, D., Bread, Knowledge and Freedom: A Study of Nineteenth Century Working Class Autobiography (London, 1981), esp. 39–86.Google Scholar

19 On working-class resistance to sanitary interventions in the 1831–32 cholera epidemic see: Morris, , Cholera, 1832;Google Scholar Durey, , The Return of the Plague;Google Scholar and especially Richardson, R., Death, Disease and Dissection (London, 1988), 223–9.Google Scholar On the Contagious Diseases Acts see: Walkowitz, J., Prostitution and Victorian Society (London, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and on anti-vaccination see Porter, D. and Porter, R., ‘The politics of prevention: anti-vaccination and public health in nineteenth century England’, Medical History, 32 (1988), 231–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 On river pollution see: Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 233–56;Google Scholar Luckin, , Pollution and Control;Google Scholar Hamlin, C., The Science of Impurity: Water Analysis in Ninetenth Century Britain (Bristol, 1990).Google Scholar

21 Sheffield Free Press, 8 06 1854.Google Scholar

22 See: Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 80–116 and 205–32.Google Scholar

23 Thompson, B., ‘Public provision and private neglect’, in Wright, D.G. and Jowitt, J.A. (eds), Victorian Bradford (Bradford, 1981), 137–50;Google Scholar Hamlin, , ‘Muddling’, passim.Google Scholar

24 Sigsworth, , ‘Cholera in the large towns’, 192–5;Google Scholar Salt, J., ‘Experiments in anarchism, 1850–1870’, Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society, 10 (1971–1977), 37–53.Google Scholar

25 Morris, , Cholera, 1832Google Scholar, and Durey, , The Return of the Plague.Google Scholar

26 This followed the pattern set in the typhus epidemic of 1846–47.

27 Sigsworth, , ‘Cholera in the large towns’, 125–30.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 169–80.

29 Ibid., 98–9.

30 Eadon, S., Cholera, Its Treatment at the Present Crisis; A letter written at the request of the Health Committee of the Borough of Sheffield (Sheffield, 1854).Google Scholar

31 Report of the Committee appointed by the Town Council to enquire into Sanitary Proceedings at Attercliffe (Sheffield, 1849).

32 Hardy, A., ‘Parish pump to private pipes: London's water supply in the nineteenth century’, in Bynum, W.F. and Porter, R. (eds), Living and Dying in London, Medical History Suppl. (1991), 76–93;Google Scholar Brown, P. S., ‘John Snow and the autumn loiterer’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 35 (1961), 526;Google Scholar Pelling, M., Cholera, Fever and English Medicine, 1825–65 (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar

33 The Times, 8 08 1849.Google Scholar

34 Hull Advertiser, 13 07 1849.Google Scholar

35 Kearns, G., ‘Cholera, nuisances and environmental management in Islington, 1830–1855’, in Bynum and Porter, Living and Dying, 76–93.Google Scholar

36 Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 81–4;Google Scholar Smith, F.B., The People's Health, 1850–1910 (London, 1979), 197–8;Google Scholar cf. Evans, R., Death in Hamburg (London, 1987).Google Scholar

37 Rosenberg, C., The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832,1849 and 1866 (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

38 Sigsworth, , ‘Cholera in the large towns’, 190–1 and 328–9.Google Scholar

39 Woodward, J.H. and Richards, N.D. (eds), Health Care and Popular Medicine in Nineteenth Century England: Essays in the Social History of Medicine (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Marland, H., Medicine and Society in Wakefield and Huddersfield, 1780–1870 (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar; Smith, , People's Health, 333–46;Google Scholar Porter, R. and Porter, D., In Sickness and In Health: The British Experience, 1650–1850 (London, 1988).Google Scholar

40 Cooler, R (ed.), Studies in the History of Alternative Medicine (Basingstoke, 1988).Google Scholar

41 Lawrence, C.J., ‘William Buchan: medicine laid open’, Medical History, 19 (1975), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Pickstone, J.V., ‘Medical botany and self-help medicine in Victorian England’, Memoirs of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 119 (1976–1977), 85–95;Google Scholar Miley, U. and Pickstone, J.V., ‘Medical botany around 1850: American medicine in industrial Britain’, in Cooter, Alternative Medicine, 140–54.Google Scholar

43 Pickstone, J.V., ‘Medical botany’, 88–90.Google Scholar

44 Floud, R., Wachter, K. and Gregory, A., Height, Health and History: Nutritional Status in the Unified Kingdom, 1750–1980 (London, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Rodger, R., ‘Employment, wages and poverty in the Scottish cities, 1841–1914’, in Gordon, G. (ed.), Perspectives of the Scottish City (Aberdeen, 1985), 52–3.Google Scholar

46 Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 61–76.Google Scholar

47 Mentioned in: Grant, R.K.J., ‘Merthyr Tydfil in the nineteenth century: the struggle for public health’, Welsh Historical Review, 14 (1989), 579.Google Scholar

48 However, on the use of baths in Liverpool see Low Life, 210–18.Google Scholar

49 Sir Cooper, Henry, The Borough of Hull Considered in Relation to the Health of its Inhabitants (Hull, 1849).Google Scholar

50 Sheffield Free Press, 8 07 1854.Google Scholar

51 Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 294–6;Google Scholar Burnett, J., A Social History of Housing, 1815–1970 (London, 1978).Google Scholar

52 Daunton, M.J., House and Home in the Victorian City: Working Class Housing, 1850–1914 (London, 1983)Google Scholar;Benson, J., The Working Class in Britain, 1850–1939 (London, 1989), 72–91.Google Scholar

53 Englander, D., Landlord and Tenant (London, 1983)Google Scholar; Kearns, , ‘Private property’, 189–93.Google Scholar

54 Wohl, A., The Eternal Slum: Housing and Social Policy in Victorian London (London, 1977).Google Scholar

55 Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 65.Google Scholar

56 Grant, , ‘Merthyr Tydfil’, 579Google Scholar, quotes a local practitioner in Merthyr saying of the local working-class, ‘I think they are naturally the cleanest people I ever saw. They are constantly washing their houses. A Welshwoman does not cease scrubbing from one day to another. I have often been surprised at this internal cleanliness, compared with external filth’.

57 Sheffield Independent, 27 01 1872.Google Scholar

58 Daunton, , House and Home, 11–37.Google Scholar

59 In Leeds in 1854 1,500 residents in the notorious East Ward signed a memorial calling for immediate action on sanitation by the Council. Leeds Mercury, 11 03 1854.Google Scholar

60 Cited in: Foster, B., ‘Public health in Hull in the nineteenth century’ (unpublished M.Phil, thesis, University of Hull, 1979).Google Scholar

61 Weindling, P. (ed.), The Social History of Occupational Health (London, 1985), 2–31.Google Scholar

62 Holland, G.C., The Vital Statistics of Sheffield (Sheffield, 1843).Google Scholar

63 Wohl, , Endangered Lives, 259.Google Scholar

64 Northern Star, 23 10 1849.Google Scholar

65 Sheffield and Rotherham Independent, 4 08 1848.Google Scholar

66 Grant, , ‘Merthyr Tydfil’, 585. Note also the importance placed on meat in the diet.Google Scholar

67 The People: 41 (1) (1848), 320–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Sheffield Free Press, 24 09 1853.Google Scholar

69 Leeds Mercury, 11 03 1854Google Scholar and Northern Star, 18 08 1849.Google Scholar