Article contents
Postscript: charismatic things and social transaction in Renaissance Italy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2010
Extract
In 1860, Jacob Burckhardt published his view, still influential today, of an artful, urban Italian Renaissance that launched Europe on its passage to modernity. A lively revisionary scholarship has challenged Burckhardt on many points, but his famous formulae still resonate: the state as work of art; the development of the individual; the discovery of the world and of man. Although we now know that Italy did not alone invent the new age, it was for many years a trendsetter, especially in the domains of cultural production at the centre of this collection of essays. Republican and princely polities alike framed these developments, but, whoever ruled, Italy's unusually intense urbanization (paired with that in another well-spring of culture in the Low Countries) fostered innovation. In Renaissance cities, people and groups invested heavily in special actions, objects and places – charismatic cultural products empowered by holiness, beauty, fame and ingenuity – that fortified solidarity and resilience in uncertain times. This essay collection addresses a conjunction of urban culture and society distinctive to Renaissance Italy: an array of encounters of artifacts with ways of living in community.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Urban History , Volume 37 , Special Issue 3: Locating communities in the early modern Italian city , December 2010 , pp. 474 - 482
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
1 Burckhardt, J., The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (New York, 1958; original publication in German, 1860)Google Scholar.
2 This work of Christian's is not to our knowledge yet in print. See also Miller, D., The Comfort of Things (London, 2008)Google Scholar.
3 Rapport, N. and Overing, J., Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts (Milton Park, 2007), 72Google Scholar (citing Hillery, G. Jr, ‘Definitions of community: areas of agreement’, Rural Sociology, 20 (1955), 111–22Google Scholar).
4 Silverman, M. and Gulliver, P. H., ‘Historical anthropology and the ethnographic tradition’, in Silverman, M. and Gulliver, P. (eds.), Approaching the Past (New York, 1992), 25 and 64 n. 74Google Scholar.
5 Martin, J. J., Myths of Renaissance Individualism (New York, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Putnam, R.D. with Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R.Y., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, 1994)Google Scholar.
7 Eckstein, N. and Terpstra, N. (eds.), Sociability and its Discontents: Civil Society, Social Capital and their Alternatives in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Leiden, 2009)Google Scholar.
8 Muir, E., ‘The sources of civil society in Italy’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29 (1999), 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T.V. Cohen, ‘Communal thought, communal words, and communal rites in a sixteenth-century village rebellion’, in Eckstein and Terpstra (eds.) Sociability and its Discontents, 23–50.
9 See also Weissman, R., Ritual Brotherhood in Renaissance Florence (New York, 1982)Google Scholar.
10 Ago, R., Economia barocca: mercato e istituzioni nella Roma del Seicento (Rome, 1998)Google Scholar.
11 Douglas, M., Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Smail, D., ‘Hatred as a social institution in late medieval society’, Speculum, 76 (2001), 90–126Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by