Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:49:53.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is speculative building underappreciated in urban history?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2007

WILLIAM C. BAER
WILLIAM C. BAER
Affiliation:
School of Policy, Planning and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The building industry's organization has been relatively invariant down through history due to housing's unique characteristics: durability, fixity in location, complex co-ordination of various trades on site and financing its great costs. That organizational form has allowed speculative development to flourish periodically during large increases in urban population, despite considerable risk. The same building and speculative processes occurred in ancient Rome and cities in England and the US at greatly different periods of time but those histories do not acknowledge the similarities of development processes that each reports. A separate ‘housing literature’ that steps back from particulars possibly explains why these accounts are so alike.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , August 2007 , pp. 296 - 316
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)