Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:07:20.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The introduction of the steam press: a court case on smoke and noise nuisances in a London mansion, 1824

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2014

AYUKA KASUGA
AYUKA KASUGA*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8501, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has recently been revealed that English common law played a certain role in dealing with the pollution problems that accompanied industrialization. This article explores the role of legal actions in solving environmental problems, not within a legal theory but in a larger framework of environmental politics. By focusing on legal actions, it is shown that the Act on Smoke Abatement of 1821 triggered smoke and noise nuisance lawsuits in London, especially against printers. The introduction of the steam press not only contributed to the production of cheap prints but also transformed the printing business into a polluting industry. Legal actions could sometimes remove a polluting business from a plaintiff's neighbourhood, though it also raised the problem of environmental inequality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 405 - 423
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hamlin, C., Public Health and Social Justice in the Age of Chadwick (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar; Goddard, N., ‘“A mine of wealth”? The Victorians and the agricultural value of sewage’, Journal of Historical Geography, 22 (1996), 274–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cooper, T., ‘Challenging the “refuse revolution”: war, waste and the rediscovery of recycling, 1900–50’, Historical Research, 81 (2008), 710–31Google Scholar. As for air pollution history, see Mosley, S., The Chimney of the World: A History of Smoke Pollution in Victorian and Edwardian Manchester (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar; Thorsheim, P., Inventing Pollution: Coal, Smoke, and Culture in Britain since 1800 (Ohio, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Joyce, P., The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City (London 2003), ch. 2Google Scholar; Otter, C., The Victorian Eye: A Political History of Light and Vision in Britain, 1800–1910 (Chicago, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ashby, E. and Anderson, M., The Politics of Clean Air (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar.

3 Brenner, J.F., ‘Nuisance law and the Industrial Revolution’, Journal of Legal Studies, 3 (1974), 421Google Scholar; McLaren, J., ‘Nuisance law and the Industrial Revolution – some lessons from social history’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 3 (1983), 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Tomory, L., ‘The environmental history of the early British gas industry, 1812–1830’, Environmental History, 17 (2012), 29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Pontin, B., ‘Environmental law history (no. 1), Tipping v St Helens Smelting Company (1865): “anti-development” or “sustainable development”?’, Environmental Law and Management, 19 (2007), 7–18Google Scholar; Pontin, B., ‘The secret achievements of nineteenth-century nuisance law: Attorney General v Birmingham Corporation (1858–95) in context’, Environmental Law and Management, 19 (2007), 271–90Google Scholar.

6 Sheppard, F., London 1808–1870: The Infernal Wen (London, 1971), 29Google Scholar.

7 Hansard, T.C., The Parliamentary Debates, New Series Vol. I (London, 1820), 51–2Google Scholar.

8 British Parliamentary Papers (BPP) 1819 (574); BPP 1820 (244).

9 Morning Chronicle (MC), 24 May 1820, col. 3b; Morning Post (MP), 25 May 1820, col. 3d.

10 The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, 1&2 George IV (London 1821), 93.

11 Hills, R.L., James Watt, vol. III: Triumph through Adversity, 1785–1819 (Ashbourne, 2006), 48Google Scholar.

12 Earwaker, J.P., The Court Leet Records of the Manor of Manchester (Manchester, 1889)Google Scholar; Bowler, C. and Brimblecombe, P., ‘Control of air pollution in Manchester prior to the Public Health Act, 1875’, Environment and History, 6 (2000), 71–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Mosley, The Chimney of the World, 137.

14 Leeds Mercury, 2 Feb. 1822, col. 3b, 2 Mar. 1822, col. 3d, 27 Apr. 1822, col. 3b, 21 Sep. 1822, col. 1a.

15 A. Kasuga, ‘Views of smoke in England, 1800–1830’, University of Nottingham Ph.D. thesis, 2013, 125–8.

16 West Yorkshire Archives Leeds, Bean Ing (Rex v. Gott) Leeds Smoke Nuisance, legal papers, WYL160/116, testimonies by manufacturers in Manchester and London.

17 Ashby and Anderson, The Politics of Clean Air, 6; Brimblecombe, P., The Big Smoke: A History of Air Pollution in London since Medieval Times (London, 1987), 101Google Scholar; Tomory, ‘The environmental history of the early British gas industry’, 30.

18 Payer, P., ‘The age of noise: early reactions in Vienna, 1870–1914’, Journal of Urban History, 33 (2007), 773–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Fox, C., Graphic Journalism in England during the 1830s and 1840s (New York, 1988), 143Google Scholar.

20 Cavendish, M., The Life of William Cavendishe, Duke of Newcastle (London, 1667), 85Google Scholar.

21 Merritt, J.F., The Social World of Early Modern Westminster: Abbey, Court and Community, 1525–1640 (Manchester, 2005), 184–5Google Scholar; Brimblecombe, The Big Smoke, 42; Evelyn, J., Fumifugium (London, 1661)Google Scholar.

22 MC, 18 Jul. 1823, col. 4b; MC, 18 Nov. 1823, col. 4b; in the article, Symonds was reported as ‘Symmons’.

23 MC, 29 Apr. 1824, col. 4d; MP, 29 Apr. 1824, 2e; The Morning Chronicle reported the name of the defendants as Chapman and another.

24 Place, F., The Autobiography of Francis Place: (1771–1854) (Cambridge, 1972), 213–14, 228Google Scholar; BPP 1826 (208).

25 Guerci, M., ‘Charles Barry's designs for Northumberland House’, in Salmon, F. (ed.), The Persistence of the Classical: Essays on Architecture Presented to David Watkin (London, 2008), 136–50Google Scholar.

26 de Fonblanque, E.B., Annals of the House of Percy, from the Conquest to the Opening of the Nineteenth Century, vol. II (London, 1887), 569Google Scholar; Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, sub Hugh Percy (1784–1856).

27 The Archives of the Duke of Northumberland at Alnwick Castle (AC), The Duke of Northumberland v. Clowes (DNC) Sy:N.XIV.10, Trial Record (TR), 12 Jun. 1824. Unfortunately, the witnesses for Clowes were not examined at the trial because both sides agreed to arbitration before their examination.

28 AC/DNC, Brief for the Plaintiff (BP), 1824, 24–44.

29 AC/DNC, Brief for the Plaintiff on the Reference (BPR), 1824, 36–41.

30 Criminal case records are often used to reconstruct the lives of social groups whose records are not left in the forms of letters, diaries and biographies. For example, Vickery, A., Behind Closed Doors: At Home in Georgian England (New Haven, 2009)Google Scholar; Shoemaker, R.B., The London Mob: Violence and Disorder in Eighteenth-Century England (London, 2004)Google Scholar.

31 Clowes, W.B., Family Business, 1803–1953 (London, 1953), 6–25Google Scholar.

32 BPP 1822 (607), 223.

33 AC/DNC, Further Observations (FO), 7.

34 Times, 29 Nov. 1814, col. 3b.

35 Moran, J., Printing Presses: History and Development from the Fifteenth Century to Modern Times (London, 1973), 123Google Scholar.

36 AC/DNC, TR, 286, 329.

37 AC/DNC, TR, 98–101, 121–4, 147–8.

38 AC/DNC, BPR, 37.

39 AC/DNC, BPR, 36.

40 In Figure 1, the room is named as small dining room.

41 AC/DNC, TR, 133–44.

42 Cockayne, E., Hubbub: Filth, Noise & Stench in England (New Haven, 2007), ch. 5Google Scholar.

43 AC/DNC, TR, 163–8; AC/DNC, BP, 27.

44 AC/DNC, TR, 101.

45 Ibid., 302.

46 Ibid., 307.

47 Curtis, S., William Curtis, 1746–1799: Fellow of the Linnean Society, Botanist & Entomologist (Winchester, 1941), 84Google Scholar.

48 Abies entry in Miller, P., The Gardeners Dictionary (Dublin, 1764)Google Scholar; Longstaffe-Gowan, T., The London Town Garden 1740–1840 (New Haven, 2001), 17–19Google Scholar.

49 AC/DNC, TR, 155–7.

50 Ibid., 149.

51 AC/DNC, BP, 30; however, longer working hours were not mentioned during the trial, and the possibility that the statement was slightly exaggerated cannot be excluded.

52 AC/DNC, TR, 341–4; AC/DNC, BPR, 36, 40.

53 AC/DNC, TR, 314, 345.

54 Ibid., 189–90.

55 AC/DNC, FO, 18.

56 AC/DNC, BPR, 37, 39.

57 Gugliotta, A., ‘Class, gender, and coal smoke: gender ideology and environmental injustice in Pittsburgh, 1868–1914’, Environmental History, 5 (2000), 165–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 AC/DNC, TR, 107, 125.

59 Ibid., 184–6.

60 Ibid., 117–19, 217–71; AC/DNC, BP, 43; The issue of the establishment of water rights caused a prolonged legal argument because the lawyers had not previously encountered an issue concerning a well and groundwater. In the end, the chief justice expressed his opinion to accept the water rights of a river, which means that water rights would be established after 20 years since the beginning of water use.

61 AC/DNC, FO, 14–15.

62 AC/DNC, BP, 10.

63 AC/DNC, TR, 31–2.

64 Ibid., 58.

65 Ibid., 32.

66 Ibid., 107, 427–30; AC/DNC, BP, 17.

67 AC/DNC, TR, 422.

68 Ibid., 61.

69 Ibid., 63–4.

70 BPP 1828 (267), 36–59; Graham-Leigh, J., London's Water Wars: The Competition for London's Water Supply in the Nineteenth Century (London, 2000), 16, 19Google Scholar.

71 AC/DNC, miscellaneous papers.

72 Examiner, 13 Jun. 1824, 375; Harling, P., ‘Leigh Hunt's Examiner and the language of patriotism’, English Historical Review, 111 (1996), 1159–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 AC/DNC, BP, 16.

74 Ibid., 15.

75 Lee, D., Lord Lyndhurst: The Flexible Tory (Colorado, 1994)Google Scholar.

76 Times, 21 Jan. 1825, col. 3b–c.

77 Ibid.

78 Ibid.

79 MC, 21 Jan. 1825, col. 4b.

80 MC, 15 Apr. 1828, col. 4a.

81 Times, 31 May 1825, col. 4a.

82 MC, 31 May 1825, col. 4d–e.

83 Ibid.

84 For example, see Martin, V.M., Coping with Abundance: Energy and Environment in Industrial America (Philadelphia, 1985)Google Scholar; Strasser, S., Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash (New York, 1999)Google Scholar.

85 Brimblecombe, The Big Smoke, 13–14.

86 Times, 10 Dec. 1824, col. 3a.

87 Standard, 14 Dec. 1827, col. 4a–b; MC, 14 Dec. 1827, col. 4b; The Morning Chronicle reported the plaintiff's name as Cox.

88 MC, 12 Jun. 1828, col. 3d; Times, 12 Jun. 1828, col. 5a; MP, 19 Dec. 1828, col. 2c

89 Cockayne, Hubbub, 119.

90 Clark, J.F.M., ‘“The incineration of refuse is beautiful”: Torquay and the introduction of municipal refuse destructors’, Urban History, 34 (2007), 255–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Massard-Guilbaud, G. and Rodger, R. (eds.), Environmental and Social Justice in the City: Historical Perspectives (Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar.

91 Massard-Guilbaud and Rodger (eds.), Environmental and Social Justice in the City.