Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:24.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

House names, shop signs and social organization in Western European cities, 1500–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

David Garrioch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The houses in early modern European cities almost all had names and signs. These are usually taken to be an early form of advertising, or else a way of finding one's way around the city in times before street names and numbering. This article argues that their primary purpose was to mark the individual, family or ethnic identity of the house owner or tenant. During the eighteenth century the names and signs changed in character, and by the mid-nineteenth century they had almost disappeared from city centres, primarily as a result of changes in individual and family identity among the urban middle classes, and of the transformation of neighbourhood communities under the pressure of urban economic and social integration. The evolution of house names and shop signs therefore illustrates the changing relationship between the city's residents and the urban environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 20 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would particularly like to thank Patricia Naish and the inter-library loan staff of the Monash University Library for invaluable assistance in tracking down the elusive literature on shop signs. Versions of this paper were presented to the History Department, Monash University, to the Eleventh Conference of Australasian Historians of Medieval and Early Modern Europe, and to the Sixth Biennial Conference of the Australian Historical Association. I am very grateful for the comments and suggestions I received on these occasions. I would also like to thank Wallace Kirsop, Bill Kent and Marian Aveling for numerous references and suggestions.

References

1 Heal, A., The Signboards of Old London Shops (London, 1947), 2.Google Scholar Heal reproduces illustrations of many eighteenth-century signs and of some streetscapes. Photographs of surviving signs may be found in L.B. and Ballinger, R.A., Sign, Symbol and Form (New York, 1972).Google Scholar For illustrations of Paris signs see Fournier, E., Histoire des enseignes de Paris (Paris, 1884)Google Scholar; Fegdal, C., Les Vieilles enseignes de Paris (Paris, 1913)Google Scholar; Billy, P., Vieilles enseignes de Paris en fer forgé (Paris, c. 1925).Google Scholar Grand-Carteret, J., L'Enseigne, son histoire, sa philosophie, ses particularités, les boutiques, les maisons, la rue, la réclame commerciale à Lyon (Grenoble, 1902)Google Scholar reproduces many Lyon signs. For Geneva, see Baudin, H., L'Enseigne et l'affiche (Geneva, 1905).Google Scholar There are many books on British inn signs: for a general survey see Delderfield, E., British Inn Signs and their Stories (Newton Abbot, 1972Google Scholar; first published 1965).

2 In London the signs were apparently purely pictorial until at least the late seventeenth century: Phythian-Adams, C., ‘Milk and soot. The changing vocabulary of a popular ritual in Stuart and Hanoverian London’, in Fraser, D. and Sutcliffe, A. (eds), The Pursuit of Urban History (London, 1983), 84.Google Scholar

3 Adolphe Berty found two in Paris from 1206 and 1212. He argued that they were probably more numerous than the records suggest, but he adds that there was no doubt less need for them in the less crowded outer areas than in the city centres: this corresponds to their thirteenth-century distribution: ‘Les enseignes de Paris avant Ia XVIIe siècle’, Revue archéologique, 12 (1855), 1, 2.Google Scholar In a later article studying central Paris in detail, ‘Trois îots de la Cité’, Revue archéologique, n.s., 1 & 2 (1860), 197–215, 366–90, the earliest sign found by Berty dates from the 1340s and the house-lists for this part of Paris in 1280 do not contain any. See also Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 131Google Scholar; Berger, A., ‘Lea enseignes de Paris’, Journal des débats, 24/25 05 and 1 06 1858 (24/25 May)Google Scholar; Fournier, , Histoire des enseignes de Paris, 110.Google Scholar

4 Gay, , Trivia, or The Art of Walking the Streets of London (1716)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, canto 1, quoted in Larwood, J. and Hotten, J.C., The History of Signboards, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London, 1866), 17.Google Scholar L.-S. Mercier also comments on the noise made by the signs, Tableau de Paris, 12 vols (Amsterdam, 1782–88), vol. 1, 215.

5 Berger, , ‘Lea enseignes de Paris’, 24/25 05 1858.Google Scholar

6 Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, vii.Google Scholar

7 Fegdal, , Vieilles enseignes, 12, 177, 174.Google Scholar

8 Heal, , Signboards, 2Google Scholar; Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, vGoogle Scholar; Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 11.Google Scholar Essentially the same explanations are given by Papin, Y.-D., ‘L' enseigne au XVIIIe siècle’, in Caceres, G. Gomez y and de Pierredon, M. Ange (eds), Les Décors des boutiques parisiennes (Paris, 1987).Google Scholar Grand-Carteret offers both explanations, but suggests that signs first emerged as a form of decoration motivated by the desire to make the houses distinctive, first employed by nobles with their coats of arms, later imitated by artisans and merchants: L'Enseigne, 31–2.

9 Delderfield, , British Inn Signs, 17.Google Scholar

10 Trivia, quoted in Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 17.Google Scholar

11 A point also made by Blayney, P., The Bookshops in Paul's Cross Churchyard, Bibliographical Society Occasional Paper No. 5 (London, 1990), 10.Google Scholar

12 Archives Nationales, Paris, S*1642, censive de Sainte Geneviève, c 1766-, rue des Postes nos. 2,3,7. Henceforth all manuscript references are to the Archives Nationales unless otherwise stated. The eight most popular names accounted for eighty-five of Adolphe Berty's sample of 600 Paris house names: ‘Enseignes de Paris’, 5.

13 Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 19.Google Scholar

14 S*5693, f. 63Vo. S5683, f. 153.

15 Mercier, , Tableau de Paris, vol. 5, 122.Google Scholar

16 Heal, , Signboards, 63.Google Scholar

17 S*1953 (1), f. 119.

18 Quoted in Lillywhite, B., London Signs (London, 1972), xvii.Google Scholar See the similar complaint in the Adventurer, no. 9 (1752), quoted in Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 22–3.Google Scholar

19 Quoted in Lillywhite, , London Signs, xvii.Google Scholar

20 My thanks to Professor Sybil Jack for this information. On Berne, Baudin, L'Enseigne, 23.

21 For London see Lillywhite, , London Signs, xvi, 3.Google Scholar

22 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 222.Google Scholar

23 S*1642, censier of Sainte Geneviève, 1766–1789, f. 291.

24 Mercier, , Tableau de Paris, vol. 5, 122.Google Scholar

25 See Table 1. This even applied when the sign was engraved in stone on the facade: Berty, , ‘Enseignes de Paris’, 3.Google Scholar

26 Lillywhite, , London Signs, xvi, 310.Google Scholar

27 C. Percier and P. Fontaine, quoted by Tulard, J., Nouvelle histoire de Paris. Le Consulat et l'Empire (Paris, [1970]), 195.Google Scholar

28 See the list of booksellers' signs in the Short Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland and Ireland, 1475–1640, 2nd ed., vol. 3 (London, 1991), 232–40.Google Scholar

29 Berty, . ‘Enseignes de Paris’, 6, 8.Google Scholar

30 Lillywhite, , London Signs, 73.Google Scholar

31 Lillywhite, , London Signs, 328Google Scholar; Short Title Catalogue, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 232–40.Google Scholar

32 Lillywhite, , London Signs, 307–10, 328.Google Scholar Nevertheless, a ‘King's Head’ and a ‘King's Arms’ are listed among the booksellers' signs in the Short Title Catalogue, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 327.Google Scholar

33 Macaulay, Biographical Essays, ‘Frederick the Great’, quoted in Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 54.Google Scholar On Vernon's earlier popularity for British signs see Wilson, K., ‘Empire, trade and popular politics in mid-Hanoverian Britain: the case of Admiral Vernon’, Past and Present, 121 (11 1988), 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Mercier, , Tableau de Paris, vol. 5, 147.Google Scholar

35 Chartier, R., Les origines culturelles de la Révolution française (Paris, 1990), 108, 138–66.Google Scholar

36 S*1637, f. 480.

37 S*5693, f. 63vo S5683, f. 153. Livre terriers of Fief de l'Oursine, 1717,1754.

38 Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 279.Google Scholar The same feeling may have motivated the mid-seventeenth-century Geneva Consistory to order the removal of ‘A l'ange’ (the Angel). The sentiment lasted longer in this stronghold of Calvinism, for in the eighteenth century the Consistory ordered the replacement of a sign of the three kings with a sculpture of the kings of England, France and Prussia. Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 36.Google Scholar

39 H 3382, accounts of the Abbey of Saint Marcel, 1761, expenses, chapter 11, extraordinary expenditure. Phythian-Adams, ‘Milk and soot’, 84. Roche, D., The People of Paris (Leamington Spa, 1987; first published Paris, 1981), 226–8.Google Scholar

40 Lillywhite, , London Signs, 334, 525Google Scholar and illustration facing p. 1. Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 17.Google Scholar

41 S*1637. f. 484. The best hats were made from beaver fur.

42 Blayney, , Bookshops, 22.Google Scholar

43 Heal, , Signboards, 35. See also 11.Google Scholar

44 Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 471Google Scholar; Lillywhite, , London Signs, xvii.Google Scholar

45 Blayney, , Bookshops, 49.Google Scholar Blayney also suggests that when John Williams chose the‘Crown and Globe’ for his sign, he was making a direct allusion to two earlier shops bearing those names, owned by members of the Waterson family (p. 47). Teynac, F., Nolot, P. and Vivien, L.-D., Wallpaper. A History (London, 1982Google Scholar; first published Paris, 1981), 38, cite a mid-eighteenth-century law case over a sign used by the pupil of a craftsman, despite the fart that the master's widow had taken over the shop: she sued, and lost!

46 S*1637, f. 529. S1914, list of 1673.

47 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 90.Google Scholar Y10994,24 May 1752, witness 9. S*1642, rue du Puits L'hermite, no. 4; rue Censier, no. 14. Dezobry, C., ‘Archéologie future ou Grandeur et Décadence des Enseignes de boutiques en France et surtout à Paris’, Revue archéologique, 14 (10 1857-03 1858), 739.Google Scholar

48 Blayney, , Bookshops, 45Google Scholar; Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 473Google Scholar; Heal, , Signboards, 31Google Scholar; S*1637, f. 490. For similar examples see Teynac, et al. , Wallpaper, 30Google Scholar; Fegdal, , Vieilles enseignes, 138Google Scholar; Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 47.Google Scholar

49 Brongniart, M., La paroisse Saint Médard au faubourg Saint Marceau (Paris, 1951), 115.Google Scholar

50 S*1637, f. 529. S1914, list of 1673. Minutier Central des Notaires, Paris, VII 607, inventory of Robert Dheur, 24 September 1814.

51 S*1637, f. 475. S*1641, rue Triperet, no. 4. S*1637, ff. 561,571. S*1942, f. 52vo. See also Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 52.Google Scholar

52 Brion, M., Dürer (London, 1960), 16.Google Scholar

53 S*1641, rue Censier, no. 26.

54 S*1637, f. 561.S*1668, f. 551.

55 S*1664, f. 92 and S*1641, rue Censier, no. 16.

56 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 152.Google Scholar

57 See Kent, F.W., Household and Lineage in Renaissance Florence (Princeton, 1977), 125–49Google Scholar for examples of a similar attachment to family property among the prominent families of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Florence.

58 Garrioch, D., Neighbourhood and Community in Paris, 1740–1790 (Cambridge, 1986), 28.Google Scholar On seventeenth-century London, see Boulton, J., Neighbourhood and Society. A London Suburb in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1987), esp. 138–9, 143–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Garrioch, , Neighbourhood and Community, 33–7.Google Scholar

60 Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 22.Google Scholar

61 Vanel, G., Caen. Une grande ville aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (Marseille, 1981Google Scholar; first published Caen, 1910), 211–12. I am indebted to John Cashmere for this reference.

62 S*1953 (1), f. 246. S*19542, f. 338vo.

63 Y10994,21 September, 12 October 1752.

64 Heal, , Signboards 2.Google Scholar

65 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 13–14.Google Scholar Dezobry, , ‘Archéologie future’, 739Google Scholar; Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 39.Google Scholar

66 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 13Google Scholar; Mercier, , Tableau, vol. 1, 216.Google Scholar

67 Pronteau, J., Les Numérotages des maisons de Paris du XVe siècle à nos jours (Paris, 1966), 81–8.Google Scholar

68 Heal, , Signboards, 3.Google Scholar

69 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 58Google Scholar; Pronteau, , Numérotages, 109–10.Google Scholar

70 Archives de Paris, VD4, no 4539, quoted in Pronteau, , Numérotages, 111.Google Scholar

71 ibid., 134–9.

72 ibid., 84.

73 Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 34Google Scholar; Berty, , ‘Enseignes de Paris’, 3Google Scholar; Pronteau, , Numérotages, 86–7.Google Scholar

74 For an example where several members of the same family set up in the same trade, yet without any expectation of continuity, see Ménétra, J.-L., A Journal of My Life, ed. Roche, D. (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

75 Bergeron, L., Banquiers, négociants et manufacturiers parisiens du Directoire à l'Empire (Paris, 1975), 446–8.Google Scholar

76 Daumard, A., La Bourgeoisie parisienne de 1815 à 1849 (Paris, 1963), 289.Google Scholar

77 See the advertisement for T. Ryland & Son reproduced in Davidoff, L. and Hall, C., Family Fortunes. Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850 (London, 1987), 381.Google Scholar Schavye fils was a Brussels firm: Bergeron, , Banquiers, 515.Google Scholar

78 Fournel, V., Ce qu'on voit dans les rues de Paris (Paris, 1858), 289.Google Scholar

79 Heal, , Signboards, 32.Google Scholar

80 Davidoff, and Hall, , Family Fortunes, 52–7.Google Scholar The engraving is reproduced on p. 54.

81 Davidoff, and Hall, , Family Fortunes, 157–8.Google Scholar Seabrook, J., ‘Unpublished commonplace book’ (c. 1830)Google Scholar, quoted in ibid., 361–2.

82 Burke, P., Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe (London, 1978).Google Scholar For Paris, Garrioch, , Neighbourhood and Community, 99–101.Google Scholar Boisay, P., The English Urban Renaissance (Oxford, 1989), chs 10,11Google Scholar, describes the new forms of sociability and the widening marriage markets, all part of a quest for status in English provincial towns.

83 For this and what follows see my forthcoming book on family and politics in the Faubourg Saint Marcel; Daumard, , Bourgeoisie parisienne, 382–6.Google Scholar On the role of the parish in seventeenth-century London see Early, P., The Mating of the English Middle Class (London, 1989), 240–8Google Scholar and Boulton, Neighbourhood and Society. On this family pattern more generally, see esp. Goody, J., The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe (Cambridge, 1983), 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Kent, F.W., Household and Lineage, passim.Google Scholar

84 Garrioch, , Neighbourhood, esp. ch. 5.Google Scholar For England, Davidoff, and Hall, , Family Fortunes.Google Scholar

85 Roche, , People of Paris, 13.Google Scholar

86 Heal, , Signboards, 2.Google Scholar Todd, C., ‘French advertising in the eighteenth century’, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 266 (Oxford, 1989), 523–4.Google Scholar On the Europe-wide growth of shops see Braudel, F., The Wheels of CommerceGoogle Scholar, trans. Reynolds, S. (Collins, 1982; first published Paris, 1979), 67–75.Google Scholar See also Earle, , Making of the English Middle Class, 45Google Scholar, and McKendrick, N., ‘The commercialization of fashion’, in McKendrick, N., Brewer, J. and Plumb, J.H., The Birth of a Consumer Society. The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1982), 34–99.Google Scholar Borsay, , English Urban Renaissance, 22–37 and ch. 8.Google Scholar

87 On commuting in Paris see Faure, A., ‘Les déplacements de travail entre Paris et sa banlieue (1880–1914): première approche’, Ville en parallèle, 10 (06 1986), 232–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar This has been more closely studied in American cities than in European ones: see notably Hershberg, T., Cox, H.E., Light, D.B. Jr, and Greenfield, R.R., ‘The “journey to work”: an empirical investigation of work, residence and transportation, Philadelphia, 1850 and 1880’, in Hershberg, T. (ed.), Philadelphia. Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 1981), 128–73Google Scholar, and Pred, A., The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800–1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), 207–13.Google Scholar See also Bater, J.H., St Petersburg. Industrialization and Change (London, 1976), 128–9, 280–95, 392–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

88 Garrioch, , Neighbourhood, esp. ch. 8.Google Scholar See also the 1807 incident recorded by the daughter of a Birmingham manufacturer, who was harassed by two boys while on her way home from school: she took refuge in a ‘reputable-looking shop’, but did not know the shopkeeper. This was not only a reflection of growing middle-class concern about social promiscuity, but also of the absence of a neighbourhood community which might oversee and regulate such behaviour: cited in Davidoff, L. and Hall, C., ‘The architecture of public and private life. English middle-class society in a provincial town, 1780–1850’Google Scholar, in Fraser, and Sutcliffe, (eds), The Pursuit of Urban History, 343.Google Scholar See also Boulton, , Neighbourhood, ch. 9Google Scholar, and Earle, , Making, esp. 240–50.Google Scholar

89 Heal uses these trade cards, along with bills, for the 2,000 entries in The Signboards of Old London Shops. Nearly all date from the second half of the eighteenth century. See McKendrick, , ‘Commercialization of fashion’, 24–99Google Scholar, and on advertising, McKendrick, ‘George Packwood and the commercialization of shaving’, in McKendrick, , Brewer, and Plumb, , Birth of a Consumer Society, 146–94.Google Scholar

90 Todd, , ‘French advertising’, 518–19.Google Scholar

91 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 13.Google Scholar

92 Bruslons, J. Savary des, Dictionnaire universel de commerce, 3 vols (Paris, 1723–30)Google Scholar, article ‘Enseigne’. The entry is substantially the same in the later editions. Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 325–8Google Scholar; Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 30Google Scholar; Todd, ‘French advertising’, esp. 533.

93 Momentos, Historical and Classical, of a Tour through part of France, Switzerland, and Italy in the Years 1821 and 1822 (London, 1824)Google Scholar, quoted in Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 35.Google Scholar

94 Quoted in Todd, ,‘French advertising’, 523.Google Scholar The translation is mine. Visitors to London in the early nineteenth century also commented on the signs: see Larwood, and Hotten, , Signboards, 31.Google Scholar

95 Grand-Carteret, , L'Enseigne, 50Google Scholar; Savary des Bruslons, Dictionnaire universel, ‘Enseigne’.

96 Caillot, A., Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des moeurs et usages des Français, 2 vols (Paris, 1827), vol. 2, 211–12, 213–20Google Scholar on other improvements to shops, and 220–23 on gas lighting.

97 Dunand, D., Souvenirs GenevoisGoogle Scholar, quoted in Baudin, , L'Enseigne, 47–8.Google Scholar For further examples, McKendrick, , ‘Commercialization of fashion’, 78–80Google Scholar, and Davidoff, and Hall, , Family Fortunes, 366–7.Google Scholar

98 Fegdal, , Vieilles enseignes, 231.Google Scholar

99 See Garrioch, , Neighbourhood, 187–9.Google Scholar