Article contents
Cultures of nuclear resistance in 1980s Liverpool
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2015
Abstract:
Focusing on Liverpool in the early 1980s, this article argues that localized approaches to Cold War cities can help us understand the impact of national nuclear policy on cultures of local government and everyday life. After an articulation of cultural politics in the early 1980s, this article suggests that nuclear cultures that existed in Liverpool were shaped by ideas and assumptions discursively reinforced at both a national and local level.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
1 D. Hope, ‘Blinding flash of destruction’, Liverpool Echo (LE), 10 Jan. 1980, 6.
2 Evidence suggests that this process of normalization happened quickly in the years following 1945, due to the emergence of powerful and repetitive nuclear motifs in national discourse. For analysis of this trend, see van Lente, D. (ed.), The Nuclear Age in Popular Media: A Transnational History, 1945–1965 (Basingstoke, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hogg, J, British Nuclear Culture: Official and Unofficial Narratives in the Long Twentieth Century (London, 2015)Google Scholar.
3 The term ‘nuclear’ will be used throughout this article. Although used interchangeably in the broader literature, ‘atomic’ is understood here as referring to the pre-thermonuclear era.
4 Until it was scrapped under the Local Government Act 1985, Merseyside County Council (MCC) was the highest level of regional authority for the county of Merseyside. Among other things, it controlled emergency services and strategic planning. Liverpool was one of five metropolitan districts within MCC, and became a unitary authority after 1985.
5 On infrastructure, see Campbell, D., War Plan UK: The Truth about Civil Defence in Britain (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Cocroft, W.D. and Thomas, R.J.C., Cold War: Building for Nuclear Confrontation 1946–1989 (Swindon, 2003)Google Scholar; Hennessy, P., The Secret State: Preparing for the Worst 1945–2010 (London, 2010)Google Scholar. For UK opinion polls, see Brook, L.et al., British Social Attitudes Cumulative Sourcebook: The First Six Surveys (Aldershot, 1992)Google Scholar.
6 Matthew Connelly has argued that we should move away from using the term ‘Cold War’ as a definitive, descriptive or analytical category. See Connelly, M., ‘The Cold War in the longue dureé: global migration, public health, and population control’, in Leffler, M.P. andWestad, O.A. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Cold War, vol. III: Endings (Cambridge,2010), 466–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Brewer, J., ‘Microhistory and the histories of everyday life’, Cultural and Social History, 7 (2010), 87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Biess, F., ‘“Everybody has a chance’: nuclear angst, civil defence, and the history of emotions in postwar West Germany’, German History, 27 (2009), 215–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moran, J., ‘History, memory and the everyday’, Rethinking History, 8 (2004), 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Isaac, J. and Bell, D. (eds.), Uncertain Empire: American History and the Idea of the Cold War (Oxford, 2012)Google Scholar; Steege, P., Black Market, Cold War: Everyday Life in Berlin, 1946–1949 (Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar.
8 Cordle, D., ‘Protect/protest: British nuclear fiction of the 1980s’, British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 653–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Hughes, J., ‘What is British nuclear culture?: understanding Uranium 235’, British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Hogg, J., ‘“The family that feared tomorrow”: British nuclear culture and individual experience in the late 1950s’, British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Maguire, R., ‘“Never a credible weapon”: nuclear cultures in government during the era of the H-bomb’, British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 519–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Taylor, B.C., ‘Nuclear pictures and metapictures’, American Literary History, 9 (1997), 567–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Ibid., 568.
14 Ibid. A systematic focus on the powerful effects of nuclear discourse is offered in Young, A., Femininity in Dissent (London, 1990)Google Scholar.
15 Ibid., 593.
16 Empathetic approaches to the nuclear century are best encapsulated by Brown, K., Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters (Oxford, 2013)Google Scholar; Masco, J., Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico (Princeton, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Houlbrook, M., ‘Towards a historical geography of sexuality’, Journal of Urban History, 274 (2001), 498Google Scholar.
18 Monteyne, D., Fallout Shelter: Designing for Civil Defense in the Cold War (Minneapolis, 2011), xvGoogle Scholar.
19 Grant, M., After the Bomb: Civil Defence and Nuclear War in Cold War Britain, 1945–68 (Basingstoke, 2010), 78–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Ibid., 198.
21 See Schregel, Susanne, ‘Micropolitics in global perspective: a transnational history of nuclear free zones (USA, Great Britain and New Zealand, 1970–1990)’, in Conze, E., Klimke, M. and Varon, J. (eds.), Accidental Armageddons: The Nuclear Crisis and the Culture of the Cold War in the 1980s (New York, 2016)Google Scholar.
22 Taylor, ‘Nuclear pictures and metapictures’, 571.
23 Ibid.
24 O. Njølstad, ‘The collapse of superpower detente, 1975–1980’, in Leffler and Westad (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Cold War, vol. III, 135–55.
25 For a useful overview of nuclear politics and diplomacy in this period, see Baylis, J., Anglo-American Defence Relations 1939–1984: The Special Relationship, 2nd edn (London, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for useful overviews up to 1975, see Grant, M. (ed.), The British Way in Cold Warfare: Intelligence, Diplomacy and the Bomb 1945–1975 (London, 2008)Google Scholar.
26 Phythian, M., ‘CND's Cold War’, Contemporary British History, 15 (2001), 133–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Cordle, ‘Protect/protest: British nuclear fiction of the 1980s’, 656.
28 Ibid.
29 Thompson, E.P. and Smith, D. (eds.), Protest and Survive (Harmondsworth, 1980)Google Scholar; Thompson, D. (ed.), Over our Dead Bodies: Women against the Bomb (London, 1983)Google Scholar.
30 Greene, O., London after the Bomb: What a Nuclear Attack Really Means (Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar; The Report of the British Medical Association's Board of Science and Education, The Medical Effects of Nuclear War (London, 1983).
31 Prins, G. (ed.), Defended to Death (Harmondsworth, 1983)Google Scholar; Campbell, War Plan UK.
32 Bingham, A., ‘“The Monster”? The British popular press and nuclear culture, 1945 – early 1960s’, British Journal for the History of Science, 45 (2012), 609–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; C. Aubrey et al., Nukespeak: The Media and the Bomb (London, 1982).
33 See ‘Mothers in a war death pact’ Daily Mirror (DM), 5 Mar. 1984, 1. The discursive links between nuclear fear and suicide have been discussed by Hogg, ‘“The family that feared tomorrow”’, 535–49.
34 ‘In Moscow's sights: the doomsday village’, DM, 6 Nov. 1980, 5.
35 Brief examples include W.S. Churchill, ‘This sick charade that is masterminded in Moscow’, Sunday Express, 6 Jun. 1983, 7; Times, 17 Jan. 1980, 6; DM, 8 Aug. 1980, 5; Daily Express, 19 Mar. 1982.
36 Times, 19 Jan. 1980, 3; Observer, 12 Jul. 1981, 31.
37 ‘Flashpoint Manchester’, DM, 6 Nov. 1980, 16.
38 Hales, P.B., ‘The atomic sublime’, American Studies, 32 (1991), 28Google Scholar. See also Rosenthal, P., ‘The nuclear mushroom cloud as cultural image’, American Literary History, 3 (1991), 63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
39 For more detail on 1980s nuclear culture, see Hogg, British Nuclear Culture.
40 Dir. M. Jackson, Q.E.D.: A Guide to Armageddon, BBC, 1982.
41 Wr. J. Pilger, The Truth Game, ITV, 1983.
42 Belchem, J. (ed.), Liverpool 800: Culture, Character and History (Liverpool, 2006)Google Scholar.
43 J. Murden, ‘“City of change and challenge”: Liverpool since 1945’, in Belchem (ed.), Liverpool 800, 393.
44 Ibid., 428.
45 Ibid., 444–5.
46 During the Falklands conflict in 1982, this submarine sank the Argentine ship The Belgrano.
47 For biographies, see Gowing, M., ‘James Chadwick and the atomic bomb’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 47 (1993), 79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, A., Keeper of the Nuclear Conscience: The Life and Work of Joseph Rotblat (Oxford, 2012)Google Scholar; Szasz, F.M., British Scientists and the Manhattan Project: The Los Alamos Years (New York, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 LE, 10 Jan. 1980, 1.
49 Sanity, May 1983, 41.
50 See Frost, D. and North, P., Militant Liverpool: A City on the Edge (Liverpool, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 Sanity, Mar. 1983, 20.
52 LE, Friday 3 Apr. 1981, 8.
53 Merseyside CND, Bombs Away (1983).
54 Liverpool Central Library Archives (LCLA), 328CND.
55 Sanity, Oct. 1983, 9.
56 Sanity, Mar. 1983, 37, 45; LE, 2 Apr. 1983, 3.
57 Sanity, Oct. 1982, 9.
58 Hope, ‘Blinding flash of destruction’, 6.
59 Letter from ‘Pessimist, Aintree’, LE 17 Jan. 1980, 5.
60 Letter from ‘R. Hughes, Trouville Road, Liverpool’, LE, 17 Jan. 1980, 5.
61 LE, Friday 15 Apr. 1983, 6.
62 Ibid.
63 Letter from ‘Frank Smith, Walton’, LE, Saturday 16 Apr. 1983, 6.
64 Papers of C.K. Wilson, county solicitor and secretary, MCC, estate of C.K. Wilson. At the time of publication, these papers were not archived. Please contact the author for information.
65 Ibid.
66 Ibid.
67 Ibid.
68 Ibid.
69 ‘Merseyside County Council, Special Sub-Committee Minutes (Civil Defence Issues)’, LCLA M352 MIN/2/28/9 (1983–84).
70 Ibid.
71 Merseyside CND, Merseyside and the Bomb (1983), LCLA 328CND.
72 Ibid.
73 ‘Merseyside County Council, Special Sub-Committee Minutes (Civil Defence Issues)’, LCLA M352 MIN/2/28/9 (1983–84).
74 Taylor, ‘Nuclear pictures and metapictures’, 571.
- 7
- Cited by