Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2007
The social relationships of housing tenure shape urban life. One of the most peculiar tenure regimes emerged in the towns of East and Central Africa during the colonial period. In accordance with the colonial policy of trusteeship, employers and municipalities were together responsible for housing all permanently employed Africans, who constituted the majority in most urban centres. Contemporaries noted that employers and municipalities commonly failed to do their job, a judgement that historians have endorsed. In fact, their contribution varied greatly from place to place and, though generally insufficient, was still substantial. This paternalistic tenure regime created dependency and open-ended commitments that could not be met.
1 In addition to Kenya, we refer to the territories then known as Tanganyika, Nyasaland, Northern and Southern Rhodesia.
2 Because Africans lived at much higher densities than other groups in cities, they did not occupy as much territory as their numbers might suggest.
3 On urban policy in the region before 1939 see A. Southall, ‘The impact of imperialism upon urban development in Africa’, in Turner, V. (ed.), Colonialism in Africa 1870–1960, vol. III: Profiles of Change (Cambridge, 1971), 245Google Scholar; Ive, G. and Gróak, S., ‘A contribution to a review and agenda for research into the production of the built environment in (former British Colonial Africa)’, Production of the Built Environment, 7 (1985), 335–47Google Scholar. On housing most discussions have focused on Northern Rhodesia. See Collins, J., ‘Urban planning in a British colony, 1931–1964’, in Cherry, G. (ed.), Shaping an Urban World (New York, 1980), 227–41Google Scholar. Home, R.K., ‘From barrack compound to the single family house. Planning worker housing in colonial Natal and Northern Rhodesia’, Planning Perspectives, 15 (2000), 327–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Wilson, G., ‘Mombasa. A modern colonial municipality’, in Southall, A. (ed.), Social Change in Modern Africa (London, 1961), 98–112Google Scholar; Blij, H. de, Mombasa. An African City (Chicago, 1968), 51–71Google Scholar.
5 [Lord] Lugard, F.J.D., The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (Edinburgh, 1922)Google Scholar.
6 Cooper, F., On the African Waterfront. Urban Disorder and the Transformation of Work in Colonial Mombasa (New Haven, CT, 1987), 48Google Scholar. Those who employed casual labour, for less than 24 hours, were relieved of this responsibility, a fact that encouraged the already prevalent use of casual labour on the Mombasa waterfront. See Cooper, African Waterfront, 34–5. To muddy the picture, employers were given the option of providing a housing allowance in lieu of accommodation, which some used as a pretext to limit wage. See also Anderson, D.M., ‘Master and servant in colonial Kenya, 1895–1939’, Journal of African History, 41 (2000), 459–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Arguably, trusteeship embraces any situation where one power acts on behalf of another and is inherent in the colonial relationship. Here the term is used more narrowly to refer to a policy of protecting indigenous lifeways. See Cowen, M.P. and Shenton, R.W., Doctrines of Development (London, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Dickerman, C., ‘Africans in Nairobi during the emergency. Social and economic changes, 1952–1960’, University of Wisconsin MA thesis, 1978Google Scholar; Throup, D., The Economic and Social Origins of Mau Mau (London, 1988), ch. 8Google Scholar; Anderson, D., ‘Corruption at city hall. African housing and urban development in colonial Nairobi’, Azania, 36–7 (2002), 138–54Google Scholar; Anderson, D., Histories of the Hanged. The Dirty War in Kenya and the End of Empire (London, 2005), 181–229Google Scholar.
9 For a notable exception see Lonsdale, J., ‘Town life in colonial Kenya’, in Anderson, D. (ed.), The Urban Experience in Eastern Africa (Nairobi, 2002), 207–22Google Scholar.
10 M. Parker, ‘Political and social aspects of the development of the municipal government in Kenya with special reference to Nairobi’, University of London Ph.D. thesis, 1949; School of Oriental and African Studies Archives, Hake Papers, PPMS 46, box 42, file 4:42, K.G. McVicar, ‘Twilight of an East African slum. Pumwani and the evolution of African settlement in Nairobi’, University of California Los Angeles Ph.D. thesis, 1968; Etherton, D., Mathare Valley. A Case Study of Uncontrolled Settlement in Nairobi (Nairobi, 1971)Google Scholar; R. van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty in Nairobi’, Working Paper, 26, Institute for Development, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 1972; Hake, A., African Metropolis. Nairobi's Self-Help City (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Dickerman, ‘Africans in Nairobi’; Stren, R., Housing the Urban Poor in Africa. Policy, Politics and Bureaucracy in Mombasa (Berkeley, CA, 1978)Google Scholar; Stren, R., ‘A site and service scheme in Mombasa’, in Obudho, R.A. (ed.), Urbanization and Development Planning in Kenya (Nairobi, 1981), 215–43Google Scholar; Anderson, ‘Corruption at city hall’.
11 Cf. M.G. Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe. Urban social policy and peri-urban development in Kisumu, Kenya’, University of Michigan Ph.D. thesis, 2002. On Kisumu see also Anyumba, G., Kisumu Town. History of the Built Form, Planning and Environment, 1890–1999 (Delft, 1995)Google Scholar.
12 Before 1939 see, especially, Kenya, Medical Department, The Housing of African Natives on Farms and Estates (Nairobi, 1926); Kenya, Report of the Local Government Commission, vol. I (London, 1927); United Kingdom, Colonial Office, Report of the Kenya Land Commission, September 1933 (London, 1934), Cmd 4556. The annual reports of several government departments, including those of Labour, African and Native Affairs, are also informative.
13 Valuable archival documents include the following: National Archives, Colonial Office records (CO) 892/7/1, A.E. Basden, ‘Report on the problem of housing government officials in Kenya’, Nairobi, 1926, typescript; National Archives of Kenya, University of Syracuse microfilm collection (NAKS) reel 28, file 2246, Eldoret, town clerk, ‘Memorandum. Native location scheme, Eldoret’, 1 Jul. 1930, typescript; Rhodes House (RH) MSS Afr. t.13, E.R. St A. Davies, ‘Some problems arising from the conditions of housing and employment of natives in Nairobi, 18 August 1939’, typescript; NAKS reel 74, file 2800 correspondence, P.C. Nyanza, F. Hewett, ‘A survey of government African quarters’, typescript, Kisumu, 1940, 12pp, enclosed with F. Hewett, senior health inspector, Kisumu, to medical officer of health, Kisumu. We have also made use of some later official reports, notably: CO 892/7/1, Kenya, ‘A short historical review of the salary scales and terms and conditions of Africans’, 21 Feb. 1953, cyclostyled, 7pp; CO 822/1946, C.W. Seed and W.M. Woodhouse, ‘The report of the housing mission’, 1 Sep. 1961, typescript, 19pp; RH MSS Perham, box 460, file 1, G.M. Wilson, ‘Housing in the Nairobi African locations. Summary’, mimeo typescript; RH, MSS Afr. s.919(1), Mombasa Social Survey Papers 1956–58 (MSSP), N. Burudi, ‘Housing and family census. Government, municipal and employer-built houses on Mombasa island’, mimeo typescript, Mombasa, Jun. 1957, 25pp; RH, MSS Afr. s.919(1), MSSP, G.M. Wilson, ‘Kongawea’, mimeo typescript, Feb. 1957, 15pp; RH, MSS Afr. s.919(1), MSSP, G.M. Wilson, ‘Temporary African housing – a comparison’, mimeo typescript, 1957, 6pp. We drew, especially, on Colonial Office records at the Public Record Office (now National Archives), London, together with private papers at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, and at Rhodes House, Oxford. The records of the colonial administration in Kenya allowed us to document the situation in smaller urban centres. The originals are housed in the Kenyan National Archives. We consulted the microfilm copies that are available at Syracuse University.
14 Lugard, The Dual Mandate.
15 Colonial Office, Indians in Kenya (London, 1923), 10.
16 Colonial Office, Report of the Commission on Closer Union of the Dependencies in Eastern and Central Africa (London, 1929), Cmd 3234, 58; Colonial Office, Memorandum on Native Policy in East Africa (London, 1930), Cmd 3573, 7.
17 Southall, ‘The impact of imperialism’, 245.
18 Welsh, D., ‘The growth of towns’, in Wilson, M. and Thompson, L. (eds.), The Oxford History of South Africa, vol. II: 1870–1966 (Oxford, 1971), 196–7Google Scholar.
19 Cooper, African Waterfront, 48. Those who employed casual labour, for less than 24 hours, were relieved of this responsibility. Employers also had the option of providing a housing allowance in lieu of accommodation, which some used as a pretext to limit wages. See also Anderson, ‘Master and servant in colonial Kenya’.
20 UK, Colonial Office, Report of the Kenya Land Commission, 173; G.V. Maxwell, ‘Memorandum on natives in urban areas’, in Kenya, Report of the Local Government Commission, 156–7.
21 Dilley, M.R., British Policy in Kenya Colony (New York, 1937), 187Google Scholar.
22 Elkins, C., Britain's Gulag (London, 2005), 15–17Google Scholar.
23 Clayton, A. and Savage, D.C., Government and Labour in Kenya, 1895–1963 (London, 1974), 28, 38Google Scholar.
24 Simpson, W.J., Report on Sanitary Matters in the East African Protectorate, Uganda, and Zanzibar (London, 1913)Google Scholar.
25 CO 533/209, H.R. Tate to the Office of the Provincial Administration, Nairobi, 29 Jul. 1914, 206. Attached to Despatch 554.
26 Ibid.; Kenya, Medical Department, Housing of African Natives, 5.
27 Quoted in McVicar, ‘Twilight’, 39.
28 Dilley, British Policy; W.K. Hancock, Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, vol. II, part 2 (London, 1942), 209–27.
29 Betts, R., Uncertain Dimensions. Western Overseas Empires in the Twentieth Century (Oxford, 1985), 117Google Scholar.
30 Porter, B., The Lion's Share. A Short History of British Imperialism 1850–2004, 4th edn (Harlow, 2004), 308Google Scholar; Wirth, L., ‘Urbanism as a way of life’, American Journal of Sociology, 44 (1938), 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 Elkan, W. and Zwanenberg, R. van, ‘How people came to live in towns’, in Duignan, P. and Green, L.H. (eds.), Colonialism in Africa, vol. IV: The Economics of Colonialism (Cambridge, 1975), 655–72Google Scholar.
32 Home, ‘From barrack compound’.
33 Kenya, Annual Report on Native Affairs, 1937 (Nairobi, 1938), 215.
34 Clayton and Savage, Government and Labour in Kenya, 131–4; van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty’, 26–7.
35 Kenya, Medical Department, Housing of African Natives, 9–10.
36 Kenya, Annual Report on the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya for the Year 1951 (Nairobi, 1952), 67; Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1951 (Nairobi, 1952), 22.
37 Kenya, Annual Report on the Social and Economic Progress of the People, 1931 (Nairobi, 1933), 19; Kenya, Labour Department Annual Report, 1941 (Nairobi, 1942), 1.
38 CO 892/5/4, Okeno Sare, Memo to the East Africa Royal Commission, handwritten, 1953.
39 Connolly, P.P.D., ‘Native housing – Mombasa, 29 Sept. 1939’, in Kenya, Report of the Commission Appointed to Examine the Labour Conditions in Mombasa, 1939 (Nairobi, 1939)Google Scholar, Appendix I.
40 Clayton and Savage, Government and Labour in Kenya, 209, 217.
41 St A. Davies, ‘Some problems arising’, Schedule B.
42 See also Hake, African Metropolis, 51.
43 Basden, ‘Report on the problem of housing’.
44 Kenya, ‘Short historical review’. From 1943, Africans in higher grades were required to pay, and by 1945 this was expected of all African employees. Those European and Asian civil servants who were housed received free accommodation until 1935. Seed and Woodhouse, ‘Housing mission’, 2, 4.
45 Parkes, B., ‘Contrasts in the Nairobi locations’, East African Standard, 24 Apr. 1954, 4Google Scholar.
46 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1929 (Nairobi, 1930), 129. There are indications that later PWD housing was much improved. See Parkes, ‘Contrasts in the Nairobi locations’.
47 Hewett, ‘A survey of government African quarters’.
48 Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’, 286.
49 Kenya, Report of Committee of Inquiry into Labour Unrest at Mombasa. Parts I and II (Nairobi, 1945), 87.
50 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1925 (Nairobi, 1925), 63; Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’, 287; Colonial Office, Colony and Protectorate of Kenya. Report for 1922 (London, 1924), 9.
51 Hake, African Metropolis, 256 n. 15. Hake's source was the records of the Railways administration.
52 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1929, 129; Kenya, Annual Report on Native Affairs, 1937, 215.
53 Kenya, Report of the Committee on African Wages (Nairobi, 1954), Appendix D.
54 Senga, W., ‘Growth profiles of small cities. Thika, Kenya’, in Growth Profiles of Small Cities (Tokyo, 1983), 21Google Scholar.
55 Kenya, Labour Department Annual Report, 1944 (Nairobi, 1945), 3; Kenya, Labour Department Annual Report, 1949 (Nairobi, 1950), 5; cf. Home, ‘From barrack compound’.
56 School of Oriental and African Studies Archives, Hake Papers, PPMS 46, box 37, file 4:5A, Hake, ‘Housing and industry in Nairobi’, Nairobi, n.d., roneoed.
57 Hake, African Metropolis, 257 n. 7.
58 Baker, Citizenship on the septic fringe', 239.
59 CO 822/588 ‘What Nairobi is doing to house Africans’, East African Standard, 22 May 1953.
60 Ibid., 15.
61 Colonial Office, Colony and Protectorate of Kenya. Report for 1922, 6.
62 Kenya, Annual Report, 1931.
63 Quoted by Hake, African Metropolis, 42. Similar language was used by Leys, a critical observer of Kenyan affairs, in 1924. Norman Leys, Kenya (London, 1924), 273.
64 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1925, 63; Hake, African Metropolis, 46; Kenya, Annual Report, 1931, 31.
65 Hake, African Metropolis, 46, 50. Obviously, these figures are all rough estimates. The discrepancy in the estimates for 1939 between Hake's approximation (41,000) and St Davies' dubiously precise figure (36,147) may be a measure of the number of Africans who were neither legally employed nor the official dependents of those who were.
66 St A. Davies, ‘Some problems’; see also Stren, Housing the Urban Poor, 195–6.
67 Chevenix-Trench, C., Men Who Ruled Kenya. The Kenya Administration, 1892–1963 (London, 1993), 200Google Scholar.
68 Kenya, Annual Report, 1931.
69 Clayton and Savage, Government and Labour, 218; Kenya, Report of the Commission of Inquiry Appointed to Examine the Labour Conditions in Mombasa, 1939.
70 Stren, Housing the Urban Poor, 137.
71 Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 99.
72 Tamarkin, M., ‘Mau Mau in Nakuru’, Journal of African History, 17 (1976), 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
73 Ibid., 103; cf. Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’.
74 Van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty’, 27–8.
75 The danger was real. See, for example, Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’, 335.
76 Okun, G., ‘African housing’, [letter], East African Standard, 22 Jun. 1954, 2Google Scholar; Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 83–7, 99; Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’, 311–12, 316, 321.
77 Baker, ‘Citizenship on the septic fringe’, 287–8; ‘Town housing problem in reverse’, East African Standard, 6 Jul. 1955, 4.
78 RH, MSS Afr. s.919(1), MSSP, G.M. Wilson, ‘A general summary of African housing, Nairobi’, typescript, 5.
79 Anderson, Histories of the Hanged, 220.
80 Ibid., 186; Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 77, 80–1, 82; van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty’, 27–8, 34; Hake, African Metropolis, 112.
81 Hake, African Metropolis, 147–9.
82 ‘Housing targets plan for all towns’, East African Standard, 11 Dec. 1953, 30.
83 Lonsdale, ‘Town life in colonial Kenya’; [Lord] Hailey, W.M., Native Administration in the British African Territories. Part I (London, 1950), 179–81Google Scholar.
84 Kenya, Report of the Local Government Commission, 153.
85 Ibid., quoted in Baker, ‘Citizenship at the septic fringe’, 46.
86 UK, Colonial Office, Report of the Kenya Land Commission, 470.
87 Ibid., 469.
88 Ibid..
89 Furedi, F., ‘The development of anti-Asian opinion in Nakuru district’, African Affairs, 73 (1974), 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
90 Clayton and Savage, Government and Labour, 253.
91 Kenya, Report of the Commission Appointed to Examine the Labour Conditions in Mombasa, 1939; Kenya, Report of the Committee on Inquiry into Labour Unrest at Mombasa, Parts I and II; Cooper, African Waterfront.
92 Clayton and Savage, Government and Labour, 216, 253. For a discussion of the contrasting structures of propertied power in the two cities see Lonsdale, ‘Town life in colonial Kenya’.
93 Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 103.
94 NAKS reel 57, file 2246, Kisumu, Township Committee, Minutes, typescript, 7 Jun. 1922, 1 and 6 Sep. 1922, 3; cf. Anyumba, Kisumu Town, 139. For details see Alison Hay, ‘Housing policy in colonial Kenya. A study of three provincial towns’, McMaster University MA thesis, 2004, 116–27.
95 NAKS reel 74, file 2800, correspondence, P.C. Nyanza, district commissioner, Kisumu-Londiani, to provincial commissioner, Nyanza, and the commissioner of local government, Nairobi, 30 Oct. 1939.
96 Hay, ‘Housing policy in colonial Kenya’, 102.
97 NAKS reel 92, file 2246, Nakuru. Finance and General Purposes Committee, Minutes of the 49th. Meeting, typescript, 26 Apr. 1933, 1.
98 Ibid.
99 Ibid., Minutes of the 48th. Meeting, 15 Mar. 1933, 1.
100 NAKS reel 92, file 2246, Nakuru. Works and Health Committee, Minutes of the 58th. Meeting, 11 Apr. 1934, 2.
101 NAKS reel 28, file 2246, Eldoret, Municipal Board, ‘The Eldoret (native location) by-laws’, 1930, 1–3.
102 Hay, ‘Housing policy in colonial Kenya’, 108–9.
103 NAKS reel 28, file 2246, Eldoret, town clerk, ‘Memorandum’, 1–4; Eldoret, Municipal Board, Minutes of the 10th. Meeting, 23 Jan. 1931, 3.
104 Ibid., Eldoret, Municipal Board, Annual Report (Eldoret, 1931), 4.
105 Ibid. But the claim was not absurd. Hay has estimated that in 1931 this scheme housed between a quarter and a third of Eldoret's African population. Hay, ‘Housing policy in colonial Kenya’, 109. Since the latter included dependants and unemployed workers, and since some employed workers (including domestics) were housed by employers, the initial scheme must have housed the majority of employed Africans.
106 Kenya, Annual Report, 1931, 17.
107 For historical surveys see Anderson, Histories of the Hanged, ch. 5; Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 75–108; van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty’.
108 Parker, ‘Political and social aspects’, 76, 77, 79, 93, 95; van Zwanenberg, ‘History and theory of urban poverty’, 31–2; Colonial Office, Report for 1922, 6; Hake, African Metropolis, 129–30.
109 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1925, 34; Hake, African Metropolis, 130.
110 UK Colonial Office, Report of the Kenya Land Commission, 169.
111 Hake, African Metropolis, 132.
112 Kenya, African Affairs Department, Annual Report, 1925, 63. By the mid-1950s later extensions had raised Kariokor's nominal capacity to about twice that number.
113 Ibid.; Hake, African Metropolis, 45.
114 Hake, African Metropolis, 51, 53. By 1955 the combined bedspace capacity of Kariokor and Shauri Moyo had reached 5,100. Wilson, ‘Housing in the Nairobi African locations’, 1.
115 Stren, Housing the Urban Poor in Africa, 125–7.
116 RH MSS Afr. S.919(1), MSSP, ‘By-laws nos. 92–98 of the Municipal Board of Mombasa. Single storey village layouts’, typescript, 5pp, in Mombasa Social Survey; Stren, Housing the Urban Poor in Africa, 131–2; Cooper, African Waterfront, 183.
117 Wilson, ‘Kongawea’, 5–6.
118 Ibid., 13.
119 Cooper, African Waterfront, 183–4.
120 Leys, Kenya, 277.
121 RH MSS Afr. S.919(1), MSSPapers, G.M. Wilson, ‘African housing in municipalities, townships and training centres. An appreciation of the Vasey Report of 1950’, mimeo typescript, 1957, 13.
122 O'Connor, A., The African City (London, 1983), 172, 178Google Scholar.