Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:11:05.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The History of Treatment of Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Chelsea L. Glennon
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Scott A. Shemer
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Ricardo Palma-Dias
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Mark P. Umstad*
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Associate Professor Mark P. Umstad, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052 VIC, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Historical suggestions of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) date back to the early 17th century. Placental anastomoses were first reported in 1687; however, it was Schatz who first identified their importance in 1875. He recognized ‘the area of transfusion’ within the ‘villous district’ of the placenta, which he named the ‘third circulation’. This article describes how the management of TTTS has evolved as we have gained a more sophisticated understanding and appreciation of the complex vascular anastomoses that exist in monochorionic twin placentae. Currently, fetosopic laser occlusion is the preferred treatment option for TTTS.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

The History of Treatment of Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome

TTTS is caused by unbalanced vascular anastomoses within the placenta (Acosta-Rojas et al., Reference Acosta-Rojas, Becker, Munoz-Abellana, Ruiz, Carreras and Gratacos2007; Lewi et al., Reference Lewi, Jani, Blickstein, Huber, Gucciardo, Van Mieghem and Deprest2008; Quintero, Reference Quintero2003). Historically, TTTS has conferred an almost universal perinatal mortality, with a high incidence of disability in surviving twins (Quintero, Reference Quintero2003; Weir et al., Reference Weir, Ratten and Beischer1979). With the introduction of targeted therapy, particularly fetoscopic laser ablation, outcomes have significantly improved.

Early Descriptions of Twin Placental Anastomoses

Stalpart van der Wiel first described ‘passing vessels in twin placentas’ in 1687 (Van der Wiel, Reference Van der Wiel1687). Significant progress was then made in the mid-19th century by Spaeth (Reference Spaeth1860) and Heuter (Reference Heuter1845), who described anastomoses in monochorionic placentae. In 1870, the Austrian anatomist Hyrtl produced an atlas of injected twin placentae demonstrating superficial and deep anastomoses.

However, it was Schatz, a German obstetrician, who was the first to recognize the importance of placental anastomoses in 1875 (Schatz, Reference Schatz1875). Following delivery, Schatz immediately warmed the placenta, washed out the blood, and then injected colored solutions, thereby demonstrating inter-twin vascular anastomoses. He observed that this occurred only in ‘identical twin’ pregnancies. He then provided a more comprehensive description of the fetoplacental circulation in 1886, studying 24 twin placentae where he noted three circulatory systems facilitating inter-twin transfusion. In addition to the two individual circulations, he recognized ‘the area of transfusion’ within the ‘villous district’ of the placenta, which he named the ‘third circulation’ (Schatz, Reference Schatz1886). He believed that 5–10% of the blood volume of each twin was within this ‘third circulation’, which consisted of arterioles of one twin uniting with venules of the other (Schatz, Reference Schatz1886). Schatz was the first to suggest an active ‘hydraulic system’ of the inter-fetal circulation, realizing the potential for harmful effects.

Many subsequent investigators have since contributed to the knowledge of inter-fetal circulatory anatomoses (Gedda, Reference Gedda1961). During the 1920s, Mutel and Vermelin identified variable depths of anastomoses. They reported that superficial anastomoses maintain equal pressures between the two circulations, whereas deep anastomoses cause an imbalance between the arterial and venous flow. Furthermore, they suggested that compensation could be achieved via superficial anastomoses, or by vasculogenesis of a second deep branch to neutralize the hemodynamic volumes (Gedda, Reference Gedda1961). Resinelli and Ferroni, in 1940, recognized that anastomoses are usually balanced; however, when the superficial vessels can no longer compensate for the deep vessel disparity, there is an asymmetry within the third circulation, subsequently resulting in functional, anatomical, and pathological conditions within the twins (Gedda, Reference Gedda1961). These findings were affirmed by Werner, who created casts of both superficial and deep anastomoses (Gedda, Reference Gedda1961). In 1948, De Camillis and Tammeo injected radio-opaque dye into the vasculature of twin placentae, identifying the number, volume, position, and nature of anastomoses via X-ray (Gedda, Reference Gedda1961). Through this technique, they demonstrated that arteriovenous anastomoses are always deep, and the number of these should be equal in each direction.

Diagnosis of TTTS

The earliest suggestion of TTTS dates back to the book of Genesis, which describes the birth of Esau and Jacob, the twin boys of Isaac and Rebecca. Esau, the firstborn, emerged ‘red all over’ and Jacob was born pale, representing the recipient and donor twin, respectively.

De Wikkellkinderen (The Swaddled Children), painted in 1617, illustrates twin boys, one pale and the other plethoric. This is now thought to depict TTTS (Berger et al., Reference Berger, de Ward and Molenaar2000).

Schatz was the first author to describe TTTS in 1886. He illustrated grossly discordant twins, one who was larger and ‘oedematous’, and the other who was growth restricted and ‘shrivelled’. The ‘oedematous’ twin died at 12 hours with a distended bladder at autopsy, whereas the ‘stuck twin’ died at 53 hours with an empty bladder. After recognizing this as sequelae of unbalanced anastomoses, he hypothesized that the ‘third circulation’ predominated and resulted in TTTS (Schatz, Reference Schatz1886; Urig et al., Reference Urig, Clewell and Elliot1990). He inferred that the recipient twin was oedematous, had polyhydramnios secondary to excessive intrauterine urination, and developed cardiac failure leading to hepatosplenomegaly and ascites.

In 1965, Naeye, an American pathologist, offered a more sophisticated understanding of TTTS. He identified the effect of chronic nutritional deprivation on the size of organs in the donor twin, while appreciating that transfusion to the recipient increased the hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit, with subsequent cardiomyopathy and hypertension (Naeye, Reference Naeye1965). Traditionally, this discordant neonatal inter-twin hemoglobin concentration was used in the diagnosis of TTTS, as was a difference in skin color and birth weight discrepancy of greater than 20% (Ropacka et al., Reference Ropacka, Markwitz and Blickstein2002; Taylor & Fisk, Reference Taylor, Fisk, Blickstein and Keith2005).

From the early 1980s, advanced ultrasonography was used to confirm the role of arteriovenous anastomoses in TTTS. Bajora used ultrasound to compare vasculature in monochorionic placentae, demonstrating a single deep arteriovenous anastomosis in TTTS, suggesting that a paucity of vascular connections caused unequal blood flow between the two halves of the placenta (Bajora et al., Reference Bajora, Wigglesworth and Fisk1995).

The role of ultrasound in the assessment of TTTS assumed greater importance in the following years. Suzuki, in 1999, studied middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA) doppler waveforms of growth restricted fetuses with TTTS, and identified significantly higher MCA pulsatility index (PI) and UA PI values in the smaller twin (Suzuki et al., Reference Suzuki, Sawa, Yoneyama, Otsubo and Araki1999). These results suggested an absence of blood flow redistribution in growth restricted fetuses affected by TTTS.

In 1999, Quintero used ultrasound criteria to standardize the staging of TTTS (Quintero et al., Reference Quintero, Morales, Allen, Bornick, Johnson and Kruger1999). His classification remains in effect today.

The Chronology of TTTS Treatments

Expectant Management and Natural History

Traditionally, the natural history of TTTS is of almost certain fetal mortality, with other severe complications, including worsening polyhydramnios with subsequent premature birth, and hydrops secondary to cardiac failure (Weir et al., Reference Weir, Ratten and Beischer1979). Quintero's staging system affords the ability to predict prognosis by stage. Untreated, Stage I TTTS confers an 86% overall survival rate, with progression to a higher stage in 10–30% percent of patients; that is, three quarters of patients with stage I TTTS remain stable or regress spontaneously (Bebbington et al., Reference Bebbington, Tbilad, Huesler-Charles, Wilson, Mann and Johnson2010; Rossi & D'Addario, Reference Rossi and D'Addario2013).

In 5% of cases of Stage I or II disease, fetal demise of one or both twins can occur without warning (O'Donoghue et al., Reference O'Donoghue, Cartwright, Galea and Fisk2007; Senat et al., Reference Senat, Deprest, Boulvain, Paupe, Winer and Ville2004).

Although no randomized control trials for expectant management of stages II to IV have been performed (Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Simpson, Reference Simpson2013), available data shows that the natural history of advanced TTTS is extremely poor, with a 70–100% perinatal mortality rate, particularly when it presents earlier than 26 weeks’ gestation (Berghella & Kaufmann, Reference Berghella and Kaufmann2001; Gul et al., Reference Gul, Slan, Polat, Cebeci, Bulut, Sahin and Ceylan2003). As such, expectant management often leads to the demise of at least one twin, with loss of the remaining twin in 12% of cases (Ong et al., Reference Ong, Zamora, Khan and Kilby2006) and mortality and severe disability in approximately 50% of surviving co-twins (Van Heteren et al., Reference van Heteren, Nijhuis, Semmekrot, Mulders and van den Berg1998).

Amnioreduction

Therapeutic amnioreduction may be undertaken from 15 weeks’ gestation, when the deepest vertical pocket (DVP) in the recipient sac is greater than 8 cm, to achieve a DVP of less than 5–6 cm (Crombleholme et al., Reference Crombleholme, Shera, Lee, Johnson, D'Alton, Porter and Young2007; Senat et al., Reference Senat, Deprest, Boulvain, Paupe, Winer and Ville2004). The aim is to reduce the polyhydramnios and, as a consequence, reduce the risk of preterm labor.

In addition, by reducing the liquor volume, the resultant decrease in the intra-amniotic and placental vasculature pressures improves placental blood flow (Garry et al., Reference Garry, Lysikiewicz, Mays, Canterino and Tejani1998). There is also a 74% increase in uterine artery blood flow, which too may play a role in improving fetal condition (Bower et al., Reference Bower, Flack, Sepulveda, Talbert and Fisk1995).

Releasing the pressure on the veno-venous anastomoses may allow them to regain compensatory function, and return the placenta ‘from being flat and stretched to plump’ (Machin & Keith, Reference Machin and Keith1999).

Early series removed small volumes of amniotic fluid, as it was thought that removing larger volumes may precipitate placental abruption or preterm labor (Cabrera-Ramirez & Harris, Reference Cabrera-Ramierz and Harris1976). In 1980, Mills suggested repeated drainage to maintain liquor volumes close to normal (Mills, Reference Mills1980). Feingold et al. (Reference Feingold, Centrulo, Newton, Weiss, Shakr and Shmoys1986) then described two cases whereby 3500 mL and 4750 mL of amniotic fluid were removed, prolonging the pregnancy by 14 and 11 days, respectively; two of the four fetuses survived. They concluded that decompressive amniocentesis ‘can offer some hope to an otherwise hopeless situation’. Several authors have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with aggressive repeated therapeutic amniocentesis before the onset of preterm labor, with relatively few complications (Elliot et al., Reference Elliot, Urig and Clewell1991; Saunders et al., Reference Saunders, Smijders and Nicolaides1992; Urig et al., Reference Urig, Clewell and Elliot1990). Consequently, serial amnioreduction was first-line treatment for severe TTTS in the 1990s.

A literature review, comprising 256 fetuses from 26 studies, including cases dating back to the 1930s, reported an overall survival rate of 49% following serial amnioreduction in the treatment of TTTS (Moise, Reference Moise1993). More recent data shows an average survival rate of 50–65% (Dickinson & Evans, Reference Dickinson and Evans2000; Mari et al., Reference Mari, Roberts, Detti, Kovanci, Stefos, Bahado-Singh and Fisk2001); this figure is as high as 77% if treatment is initiated during Stage I disease (Rossi & D'Addario, Reference Rossi and D'Addario2013). However, subsequent reviews no longer support amnioreduction as the first-line treatment for TTTS, unless other more sophisticated methods are unavailable or while awaiting transfer to another center (Roberts et al., Reference Roberts, Gates, Kilby and Neilson2008).

Fetoscopic Laser Occlusion

Fetoscopic laser coagulation of vascular communications between the fetoplacental circulations aims to dichorionize the placenta. In 1984, obstetrician Dr Julian DeLia and placental pathologist Dr Kurt Benirschke developed a technique to interrupt the inter-twin vascular anastomoses involved in TTTS. The experimental technique was first performed on ewes and monkeys using a neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (DeLia et al., Reference DeLia, Cukierski, Lundergan and Kochenour1989; DeLiad et al., Reference DeLia, Rogers and Dixon1985). On October 3, 1988, after years of using placental and animal models, DeLia performed the first fetoscopic laser ablation on a human patient at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center. In 1990, he described the outcomes of a further two cases at risk of preterm labor from acute polyhydramnios (DeLia et al., Reference DeLia, Cruikshank and Keye1990). Two of the three cases were uncomplicated, with success in coagulating all of the superficial vascular anastomoses on the chorionic surface; the third had placental vessel perforation. The pregnancies were prolonged by between 7 and 12 weeks, and four of the six infants survived. This technique was performed under general or regional anesthesia, with laparotomy and hysterotomy for endoscopy and laser ablation.

In 1992, Ville et al. developed a less invasive technique using local anesthesia and percutaneous endoscopic laser coagulation (Ville et al., Reference Ville, Hecker, Ogg, Warren and Nicolaides1992). Ville et al. (Reference Ville, Hyett, Hecher and Nicolaides1995) then described a method of systematic non-selective coagulation of all surface chorionic vessels crossing or adjacent to the inter-twin membrane in order to interrupt the afferent and efferent branches of the deeper arteriovenous anatomoses. Ville et al. (Reference Ville, Hecher, Gagon, Sebire, Hyett and Nicolaides1998) published a study of 132 patients with severe TTTS, reporting an overall survival rate of 55%, with single-twin survival in 73%. DeLia et al. (Reference DeLia, Kuhlmann and Lopez1999) then recorded a 69% overall survival rate, with 82% of pregnancies having at least one survivor.

A meta-analysis of non-selective ablation for severe TTTS presenting prior to 28 weeks’ gestation demonstrated an overall survival rate of 58%, with at least one survivor in 74% of cases, a rate comparable to serial amnioreduction (Fisk et al., Reference Fisk, Taylor, Harrison, Evans, Adzick and Holzgreve2000). It is hypothesized that limited improvement in survival was attributable to the fact that the inter-twin membrane does not necessarily represent the ‘vascular equator’ between the two fetoplacental circulations. Thus, necessary non-anastomotic vessels are sacrificed, consequently obliterating perfusion to cotyledons (DeLia et al., Reference DeLia, Fisk and Hecher2000; Thilaganathan et al., Reference Thilaganathan, Gloeb, Sairam and Tekay2000). This is supported by postpartum pathological findings of areas of complete placental necrosis (DeLia et al., Reference DeLia, Cruikshank and Keye1990), with this placental insult primarily affecting the donor twin.

This prompted Quintero et al. (Reference Quintero, Morales, Mendoza, Allen, Kalter, Giannina and Angel1998) to develop an alternative technique whereby the anastomoses between the interfetal circulations were identified and coagulated — ‘selective laser coagulation’. Quintero et al. (Reference Quintero, Comas, Bornick, Allen and Kruger2000) reported that this selective method yielded superior results, with survival of at least one infant in 83% of patients. Hecher et al. (Reference Hecher, Plath, Bregenzer, Hansmann and Hackleor1999) achieved similar results, with overall survival of 68% using selective laser techniques, compared with 61% using a non-selective method, and 51% with amnioreduction.

Quintero et al. (Reference Quintero, Ishii, Chmait, Bornick, Allen and Kontopoulos2007) then proposed a sequential approach to selective laser ablation. Here, the anastomotic vasculature is first mapped, and anastomoses are then coagulated in an arteriovenous, venoarterial, and finally arterioarterial sequence. This resulted in decreased fetal demise (7.3% vs. 21.4%) and improved dual perinatal survival (73.7% vs. 57.1%) compared to non-sequential selective laser ablation.

Lopriore et al. (Reference Lopriore, Slaghekke, Middleldorp, Klumper, Oepkes and Vandenbussche2009) and Chalouhi et al. (Reference Chalouhi, Essaoui, Stirnemann, Quibel, Deloison, Salomon and Ville2011) suggested superficial coagulation of microvasculature on the chorionic plate between ablated anastomotic sites following selective laser occlusion. This ‘Solomon technique’ thereby creates a distinct separation of the two fetal vascular territories on the surface of the placenta. It has been shown to improve both double-twin survival and overall neonatal survival, with rates of 84.6% and 86.5%, respectively. It may also play a role in preventing recurrence or twin anemia polycythaemia sequence (TAPS) by reducing the incidence of residual small anastomoses (Ruano et al., Reference Ruano, Rodo, Peiro, Shamshirsaz, Haeri, Nomuras and Belfort2013).

Currently, fetoscopic laser ablation is accepted as the first-line treatment for stage II to IV TTTS in pregnancies under 26 weeks’ gestation (SMFM & Simpson, Reference Simpson2013).

Medical Management

Medical therapies are most commonly used in conjunction with interventional amnioreduction or laser ablation. DeLia et al. (Reference DeLia, Emery, Sheafor and Jenninson1985) first suggested the use of maternal digoxin therapy in the setting of persistent signs of cardiac failure in the recipient twin. He demonstrated resolution of cardiac decompensation, and both twins survived. Subsequent authors have since evaluated digoxin as an adjunct to laser or amnioreduction with successful results (Arabin et al., Reference Arabin, Laurini, van Eyck and Nicolaides1998; Roman & Hare, Reference Roman and Hare1995); however, the evidence is limited, and digoxin is no longer prescribed for management of TTTS.

Several studies have evaluated the role of indomethacin in prolonging pregnancy. Indomethacin reduces fetal renal perfusion and consequently polyhydramnios. The use of indomethacin was first described by Cabrol et al. (Reference Cabrol, Landesman, Muller, Uzan, Sureau and Saxena1987). However, it has subsequently been shown to worsen oligohydramnios in the donor twin and is rarely used (Demandt et al., Reference Demandt, Legius, Devlieger, Lemmens, Proesmans and Eggermont1990).

More recently, a case-control study suggested a role for nifedipine in addition to selective laser ablation. Crombleholme et al. (Reference Crombleholme, Lim, Habli, Polzin, Jaekle, Michelfelder and Kim2010) reported improved outcomes in the recipient twin with maternal administration of nifedipine 24–48 hours prior to laser occlusion in 141 cases of TTTS with evidence of fetal cardiomyopathy.

At present, medical management is not recommended as either a first-line or routine adjunctive therapy in the treatment of TTTS.

Septostomy

Septostomy allows equilibration of amniotic fluid volumes between twins. This corrects polyhydramnios, and possibly improves the hemodynamic status of the donor by allowing for oral rehydration and improved fluid resorption. It was initially described following inadvertent iatrogenic puncture of the amnion in the septum at the time of amnioreduction (Saade et al., Reference Saade, Olson, Belfort and Moise1995). Saade et al. (Reference Saade, Belfort, Berry, Bui, Montgomery, Johnson and Moise1998) then published a series of 12 cases and reported 83% perinatal survival, prompting the commencement of a randomized control trial comparing the results to amnioreduction. Two studies have concluded no significant difference in overall perinatal survival, although septostomy often avoids the need for repeat procedures, in contrast to amnioreduction (Moise et al., Reference Moise, Dorman, Lamvu, Saade, Fisk, Dickinson and Skupski2005; Saade et al., Reference Saade, Moise, Dorman, Fisk, Lmanvu and Dickinson2002). Septostomy, however, is associated with a risk of disrupting the inter-twin membrane, thereby creating a functional monoamniotic gestation. This confers a risk of cord entanglement and double-twin demise (Cook & O'Shaughnessy, Reference Cook and O'Shaughnessy1997; Taylor & Fisk, Reference Taylor, Fisk, Blickstein and Keith2005). It has subsequently been abandoned as a form of treatment for TTTS.

Selective Feticide

Selective reduction involves interrupting the transfusion process by intentional feticide of one twin. It is imperative that all vascular connections are occluded simultaneously to prevent exsanguination from one twin to the other. Although unsuccessful, it was first performed in 1967 with cord ligation (Benirschke & Driscoll, Reference Benirschke and Driscoll1967). Since then, many other techniques have been used, including interstitial laser coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, and bipolar cord coagulation. A systematic review reported an average survival rate of 79% in the remaining twin (Rossi & D'Addario, Reference Rossi and D'Addario2009); however, there is limited data regarding neurological outcomes (Rossi et al., Reference Rossi, Vanderbilt and Chmait2011).

In the 1990s, experimental ultrasound-guided sclerosant injection using alcohol or helical metal coils was also described; however, it was associated with high failure rates, as it only occludes one vessel (Saade et al., Reference Saade, Ludomirsky, Fisk, Fisk and Moise1997).

A further method of selective reduction for TTTS involves bipolar cord coagulation, which was originally developed for acardiac or anomalous twins (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Shalev, Tanawattanacharoen, Jolly, Kumar, Weiner and Fisk2002). This technique uses bipolar diathermy forceps under ultrasound guidance with serial coagulation to occlude blood flow. Potential complications of selective feticide include preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), preterm labor (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Shalev, Tanawattanacharoen, Jolly, Kumar, Weiner and Fisk2002), and embolic and coagulopathic effects in the surviving twin (Szymonowicz et al., Reference Szymonowicz, Preston and Yu1986). This treatment option is therefore only reserved for severe cases of TTTS where the demise of one twin is imminent or extremely likely.

Conclusion

The effective treatment of TTTS relies on a sophisticated understanding and appreciation of the complex vascular anastomoses that exist in monochorionic twin placentae. History abounds with well-intentioned, carefully considered, but ultimately poorly successful treatments for TTTS. Fetoscopic laser ablation is currently the preferred option for management of this potentially devastating condition.

References

Acosta-Rojas, R., Becker, J., Munoz-Abellana, B., Ruiz, C., Carreras, E., & Gratacos, E.; . (2007). Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. International Journal Gynecology and Obstetrics, 96, 98102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arabin, B., Laurini, R. N., van Eyck, J., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1998). Treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome by laser and digoxin. Biophysical and angiographic evaluation. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 13, 141146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajora, R., Wigglesworth, J., & Fisk, N. M. (1995). Angioarchitecture of monochorionic placentas in relation to the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172, 856–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, M. W., Tbilad, E., Huesler-Charles, M., Wilson, R. D., Mann, S. E., & Johnson, M. P. (2010). Outcomes in a cohort of patients with stage I twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 36, 4851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benirschke, K., & Driscoll, S. G. (1967). The pathology of the human placenta. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, H. M., de Ward, F., & Molenaar, Y. (2000). A case of twin-to-twin transfusion in 1617. The Lancet, 356, 847848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berghella, V., & Kaufmann, M. (2001). Natural history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 46, 480484.Google ScholarPubMed
Bower, S. J., Flack, N. J., Sepulveda, W., Talbert, D. G., & Fisk, N. M. (1995). Uterine artery blood flow response to correction of amniotic fluid volume. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 173, 502507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabrera-Ramierz, L., & Harris, R. E. (1976). Controlled removal of amniotic fluid in hydramnios. Southern Medical Journal, 69, 239240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrol, D., Landesman, R., Muller, J., Uzan, M., Sureau, C., & Saxena, B. B. (1987). Treatment of polyhydramnios with prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor (indomethacin). American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 157, 422426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalouhi, G. E., Essaoui, M., Stirnemann, J., Quibel, T., Deloison, B., Salomon, L., & Ville, Y. (2011). Laser therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Prenatal Diagnosis, 31, 637646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, T. L., & O'Shaughnessy, R. (1997). Iatrogenic creation of a monoamniotic twin gestation in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, 16, 853855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombleholme, T. M., Lim, F. Y., Habli, M., Polzin, W., Jaekle, R., Michelfelder, E., . . . Kim, M. O. (2010). Improved recipient survival with maternal nifedipine in twin-twin transfusion syndrome complicated by TTTS cardiomyopathy undergoing selective fetoscopic laser ablation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecolology, 203, 397e19.Google Scholar
Crombleholme, T. M., Shera, D., Lee, H., Johnson, M., D'Alton, M., Porter, F., . . . Young, B. (2007). A prospective, randomized, multicentre trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 197, 396.e19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLia, J. E., Cruikshank, D. P., & Keye, W. R. Jr. (1990). Fetoscopic neodymium: YAG laser occlusion of placental vessels in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 75, 1046–53.Google Scholar
DeLia, J. E., Cukierski, M. A., Lundergan, D. K., & Kochenour, N. K. (1989). Neodymium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser occlusion of rhesus placental vasculature via fetoscopy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 160, 485489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLia, J. E., Emery, M. G., Sheafor, S. A., & Jenninson, T. A. (1985). Twin transfusion syndrome: Successful in utero treatment with digoxin. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 23, 197201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLia, J. E., Fisk, N., & Hecher, K. (2000). Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome — Debates on eitiology, natural history and management. Ultrasound of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 16, 210213.Google Scholar
DeLia, J. E., Kuhlmann, R. S., & Lopez, K. P. (1999). Treating previable twin-twin transfusion syndrome with fetoscopic laser surgery: Outcomes following the learning curve. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 27, 6167.Google Scholar
DeLia, J. E., Rogers, J. G., & Dixon, J. A. (1985). Treatment of placental vasculature with a neodymium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser via fetoscopy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 151, 11261127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demandt, E., Legius, E., Devlieger, H., Lemmens, F., Proesmans, W., & Eggermont, E. (1990). Prenatal indomethacin toxicity in one member of monozygous twins: A case report. European Journal of Obsterics & Gynecology, 35, 267269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, J. E., & Evans, S. F. (2000). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand twin-twin transfusion syndrome registry. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 182, 706712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, J. P., Urig, M. A., & Clewell, W. H. (1991). Aggressive therapeutic amniocentesis for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 77, 537544.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., Centrulo, C. L., Newton, E. R., Weiss, J., Shakr, C., & Shmoys, S. (1986). Serial amniocentesis in the treatment in twin-twin transfusion syndrome complicated by acute polyhydramnios. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 35, 107113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisk, N. M., & Taylor, M. J. O. (2000). The fetus(es) with twin twin transfusion syndrome. In Harrison, M., Evans, M., Adzick, S. & Holzgreve, W. (Eds.), The unborn patient: The art and science of fetal therapy (pp. 341355). Philadelphia: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
Garry, D., Lysikiewicz, A., Mays, J., Canterino, J., & Tejani, N. (1998). Intra-amniotic pressure reduction in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Journal of Perinatology, 18, 284286.Google ScholarPubMed
Gedda, L. (1961). Twins in history and science. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
Gul, A., Slan, H., Polat, I., Cebeci, A., Bulut, H., Sahin, O., & Ceylan, Y. (2003). Natural history of 11 cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome without intervention. Twin Research, 6, 263266.Google ScholarPubMed
Hecher, K., Plath, H., Bregenzer, T., Hansmann, M., & Hackleor, B. J. (1999). Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amniocentesis in the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 180, 717724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuter, C. C. (1845). Der einfache Mutterkuchen der Zwillinge. Marburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Hyrtl, J. (1870). Die Blutgefasse der menschlichen Nachgeburt in normalen und abnormen Verhaltnissen. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Lewi, L., Jani, J., Blickstein, I., Huber, A., Gucciardo, L., Van Mieghem, T., . . . Deprest, J. (2008). The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation in the era of invasive fetal therapy: A prospective cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199, 514.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopriore, E., Slaghekke, F. P., Middleldorp, J. M., Klumper, F. J., Oepkes, D., & Vandenbussche, F. P. (2009). Residual anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with selective fetoscopic laser surgery: Localization, size, and consequences. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 201, e61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machin, G. A., & Keith, L. G. (1999). An atlas of multiple pregnancy biology and pathology. London: The Parthenon Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Mari, G., Roberts, A., Detti, L., Kovanci, E., Stefos, T., Bahado-Singh, R. O., . . . Fisk, N. M. (2001). Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Result of international Amnioreduction registry. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 185, 708715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, W. G. (1980). Letter to the editor. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 87, 255.Google Scholar
Moise, K. J. (1993). Polyhydramnios: Problems and treatment. Seminars in Perinatology, 17, 197209.Google Scholar
Moise, K. J. Jr., Dorman, K., Lamvu, G., Saade, G. R., Fisk, N. M, Dickinson, J. E., . . . Skupski, D. (2005). A randomized trial of amnioreduction versus septostomy in the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 193, 701707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutel, M., & Vermelin, H. (1928). Epitome of Current Medical Literature: Hydramnios with Uniovular Twins. British Medical Journal. Gynecologie et obstetrique. 217, 7980.Google Scholar
Naeye, R. L. (1965). Organ abnormalities in human parabiotic syndrome. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 46, 829842.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Donoghue, K., Cartwright, E., Galea, P., & Fisk, N. M. (2007). Stage-I twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Rates of progression and regression on relation to outcome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30, 958964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, S. S., Zamora, J., Khan, K. S., & Kilby, M. D. (2006). Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: A systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 992998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, R. A. (2003). Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clinical Perinatology, 30, 591600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, R. A., Comas, C., Bornick, P. W., Allen, M. H., & Kruger, M. (2000). Selective versus non-selective laser photocoagulation of placental vessels in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 16, 230236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintero, R. A., Ishii, K., Chmait, R. H., Bornick, P. W., Allen, M. H., & Kontopoulos, E. V. (2007). Sequential selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 20, 763768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, R. A., Morales, W. J., Allen, M. H., Bornick, P. W., Johnson, P. K., & Kruger, M. (1999). Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Journal of Perinatology, 19, 550555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, R. A., Morales, W. J., Allen, M., Bornick, P. W., & LeParc, G. (1999). Treatment of iatrogenic previable premature rupture of membranes with intra-amniotic injection of platelets and cryoprecipitate (amniopatch): Preliminary experience. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 181, 744749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, R. A., Morales, W., Mendoza, G., Allen, M., Kalter, C., Giannina, G., & Angel, J. L. (1998). Selective photocoagulation of placental vessels in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Evolution of a surgical technique. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 53, s97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D., Gates, S., Kilby, M., & Neilson, J. P. (2008). Interventions for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A cochrane review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecolology, 31, 701711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roman, J. D., & Hare, A. A. (1995). Digoxin and decompression amniocentesis for treatment of feto-fetal transfusion. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 102, 421423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ropacka, M., Markwitz, W., & Blickstein, I. (2002). Treatment options for the twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A review. Twin Research, 5, 507514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, A. C., & D'Addario, V. (2009). Umbilical cord occlusion for selective fetocide in complicated monochorionic twins: A systematic review of literature. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 200, 123239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. C., Vanderbilt, D., & Chmait, R. (2011). Neurodevelopmental outcomes after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, C., & D'Addario, V. (2013). Survival outcomes of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in stage I: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Perinatology, 1, 510.Google Scholar
Ruano, R., Rodo, C., Peiro, J. L., Shamshirsaz, A. A., Haeri, S., Nomuras, M. L., . . . Belfort, M. A. (2013). Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome using ‘Solomon technique’. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 434439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saade, G. R., Belfort, M. A., Berry, D. L., Bui, T. H., Montgomery, L. D., Johnson, A., . . . Moise, K. J. (1998). Amniotic septostomy for the treatment of twin oligohydramnios-polyhydramnios sequence. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 13, 8693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saade, G. R., Ludomirsky, A., & Fisk, N. M. (1997). Feto-fetal transfusion. In Fisk, N. M., & Moise, K. J. (Eds.), Transfusion in Fetal Therapy: Invasive and Transplacental. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 227.Google Scholar
Saade, G. R., Moise, K., Dorman, K., Fisk, N. M., Lmanvu, G., . . . Dickinson, J. E. (2002). A randomized trial of septostomy versus amnioreduction in the treatment of oligohydramnios polyhydramnios sequence (TOPS). American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 187, s54.Google Scholar
Saade, G. R., Olson, G., Belfort, M. A., & Moise, K. J. (1995). Amniotomy: A new approach to the ‘stuck twin’ syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 172, 429431.Google Scholar
Saunders, N. J., Smijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1992). Therapeutic amniocentesis in twin-twin transfusion syndrome appearing in the second trimester of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 166, 820824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatz, F. (1875). Ueber die wahrend jeder Geburt eintretende relative Verkurzung oder Verlangerung der Nabelschnur und die dadurch unter bestimmten Umstanden bedingten Storungen und Gafahren der Geburt. Archives of Gynaecology, 8, 147.Google Scholar
Schatz, F. (1886). Die Gef, sseverbindungen der Placentarkreisl, ufe eineiiger Zwillinge, ihre Entwicklung und ihre Folgen. Archives of Gynaecology, 27, 172.Google Scholar
Senat, M. V., Deprest, J., Boulvain, M., Paupe, A., Winer, N., & Ville, Y. (2004). Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 136144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), & Simpson, L. L. (2013). Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 208, 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spaeth, J. (1860). Studien uber Zwillnige. Zschr Gesell Aerzte Wien, 15, 225231; 16, 241–244.Google Scholar
Stalpart Van Der Wiel, C. (1687). Observationum rariorum medic. anatomic. chirurgicarum centuria prior, accredit de unicornu dissertation. Apud Petrum vander Aa: Lugduni Batavorum.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Sawa, R., Yoneyama, Y., Otsubo, Y., & Araki, T. (1999). Fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler waveforms in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 48, 98101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szymonowicz, W., Preston, H., & Yu, V. Y. H. (1986). The surviving monozygotic twin. Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 61, 454458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. J. O., & Fisk, N. M. (2005). Management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. In Blickstein, I. & Keith, L. G. (Eds.), Multiple pregnancy — Epidemiology, gestation & perinatal outcome (2nd ed., pp. 552570). Oxon, UK: Informa UK.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. J., Shalev, E., Tanawattanacharoen, S., Jolly, M., Kumar, S., Weiner, E., . . . Fisk, N. M. (2002). Ultrasound-guided umbilical cord occlusion using bipolar diathermy for stage III/IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Perinatal Diagnosis, 22, 7076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thilaganathan, B., Gloeb, D. J., Sairam, S., & Tekay, A. (2000). Sono-endoscopic delineation of the placental vascular equator prior to selective fetoscopic laser ablation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 16, 269–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urig, M. A., Clewell, W. I., & Elliot, J. P. (1990). Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 163, 15221526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Wiel, S. (1687). Observationum rariorum medic. anatomic chirurgicarum centúria prior, accedit de unicornu dissertativo. Lugduni Batavorum: apud Petrum van der Aa, 1, 329330.Google Scholar
van Heteren, C. F., Nijhuis, J. G., Semmekrot, B. A., Mulders, L. G., & van den Berg, P. P. (1998). Risk of the surviving twin after fetal death of co-twin in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92, 215219.Google ScholarPubMed
Ville, Y., Hecher, K., Gagon, A., Sebire, N., Hyett, J., & Nicolaides, K. (1998). Endoscopic laser coagulation in the management of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 105, 446453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ville, Y., Hecker, K., Ogg, D., Warren, R., & Nicolaides, K. (1992). Successful outcome after Nd:YAG laser separation of chorioangiopagus-twins under sonoendoscopic control. Ultrasound in Obsteterics & Gynecology, 2, 429431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ville, Y., Hyett, J., Hecher, K., & Nicolaides, K. (1995). Preliminary experience with endoscopic laser surgery for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 224232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, P. E., Ratten, G. J., & Beischer, N. A. (1979). Acute polyhydramnios — A complication of monozygous twin pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 86, 849853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed