Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:33:08.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Rating Measures of Health and Environmental Exposures: How Well Do Twins Agree?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Chandra A. Reynolds ,
Adam Turner ,
Margaret Gatz  and
Nancy L. Pedersen
Chandra A. Reynolds*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America. [email protected]
Adam Turner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Margaret Gatz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nancy L. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
*
*Address for correspondence: Chandra Reynolds, Department of Psychology University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twins are sometimes used as proxy informants but little is known about reliability and validity of the information thus obtained. The present study asks: (1) to what extent do twin pairs agree with each other on comparative ratings of health, psychosocial traits, and environmental exposures?; and (2) how well do comparative ratings agree with usual self-reported information about the exposures? Using 55 monozygotic (MZ) and 71 dizygotic (DZ) same-sex pairs reared together, percentage agreement was calculated for 44 comparative ratings. Pairs agreed on average about half of the time. Agreement was higher for more discrete exposures, such as smoking, but lower for more subjective variables, such as the degree to which life is experienced as stressful. Signed rank tests were used to contrast comparative ratings to differences in self- reports. Differences between twin partners in their self-report indices, where available, were in the direction suggested by the comparative rating. Comparative ratings appear most accurate for smoking and alcohol use, and less consistent for mental health symptoms and self-rated health.

Type
Articles
Information
Twin Research and Human Genetics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , 01 April 2005 , pp. 113 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005