Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:18:31.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Assessment of Peer Selection and Peer Environmental Influences on Behavior Using Pairs of Siblings or Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Pamela A. F. Madden ,
Kathleen K. Bucholz ,
Alexandre A. Todorov ,
Julia D. Grant  and
Andrew C. Heath
Pamela A. F. Madden*
Affiliation:
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center,Washington University School, USA. [email protected]
Kathleen K. Bucholz
Affiliation:
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center,Washington University School, USA.
Alexandre A. Todorov
Affiliation:
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center,Washington University School, USA.
Julia D. Grant
Affiliation:
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center,Washington University School, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Richmond, USA.
Andrew C. Heath
Affiliation:
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center,Washington University School, USA.
*
*Address for Correspondence: Pamela A.F. Madden, Ph.D., Missouri Alcoholism Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 40 N. Kingshighway, Suite #2, St. Louis, Mo 63108, USA.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many studies have found strong peer correlations for a variety of problem behaviors that begin in adolescence (e.g. substance use). Such correlations are commonly attributed to peer influences, but could also be explained by selective (‘assortative’) friendship: the tendency for those with similar patterns of behavior to become friends. Here we show how, under certain assumptions, cross-sectional data from pairs of siblings or twins and their peers may be used to resolve the contributions of peer selection and reciprocal peer environmental influences to peer resemblance. We performed power calculations to determine necessary sample sizes for rejecting with 80% power, at the 5% significance level, the hypothesis of only peer selection effects, or only reciprocal peer environmental effects. A false hypothesis of only selective friendship effects was always easier to reject than a false hypothesis of only reciprocal peer environmental influences. Limitations of these simulations, including uncertainty about the most appropriate way to model peer selection, are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Twin Research and Human Genetics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2002 , pp. 38 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002