Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:48:36.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Music, the Realist Conception of Art and the Materialist Conception of History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

STEPHAN HAMMEL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our fraught political moment is a propitious one for renewing the Marxist approach to music. Because that approach has consistently been folded into a more general Marxist discourse on art and aesthetics, any attempt must begin by revisiting what is essential to that discourse. I take its keystone to be the realist conception of art. This conception holds that artworks are a means by which at least some of their appreciators come to know truths about the world outside consciousness. Insofar as they are representational, painting, fiction, music, and drama potentially constitute vehicles for coming to understand the real world. Artistic representation on this view is understood to be analogous to mental representation.

Previous studies of Marxist aesthetics have followed Maurice Merleau-Ponty in making a sharp distinction between ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ branches of the tradition. The Eastern, beleaguered by the exigencies of Communist Party rule is often presented as the corrupt twin of the Western. The latter, developed in relative freedom and informed by a Hegelian legacy suppressed by Stalinism, alone commands theoretical, rather than merely historical, interest. This article departs from this Cold War framework in arguing that the Hegelian strand in Marxist aesthetics grows out of its Bolshevik predecessor and, crucially, shares with it a realist conception of art. After reconstructing the emergence and development of this conception (paying special attention to how music is directly addressed in the literature), I evaluate the compatibility of the realist conception of art with the materialist conception of history as it is found in Marx and Engels. I ultimately argue that moving past the realist conception of art is key to renewing the Marxist approach to music for our time.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 16 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue: Music and Socialism , February 2019 , pp. 33 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory, trans. Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Arvon, Henri. Marxist Esthetics, trans. Lane, Helen. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bogdanov, Alexander. The Philosophy of Living Experience, trans. Rowley, David G.. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Drott, Eric. ‘Music as Technology of Surveillance’. Journal of the Society for American Music 12/3 (2018), 233–67.Google Scholar
Edmunds, Neil. The Soviet Proletarian Music Movement. Bern: Peter Lang, 2000.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. ‘Realism and Didacticism’, in Marxism and Art: Writings in Aesthetics and Criticism, ed. Lang, Barel and Williams, Forrest. New York: David McKay, 1972. 48–54.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. Marx's Concept of Man with a translation from Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts by T. B. Bottomore. London: Continuum, 2003.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Pinkard, Terry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hudis, Peter. Marx's Concept of the Alternative to Capital. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2013.Google Scholar
James, C. Vaughan. Soviet Socialist Realism: Origins and Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl. Foundations of Christianity: A Study in Christian Origins. New York: International Publishers, 1925.Google Scholar
Királyfalvi, Béla. The Aesthetics of György Lukács. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Laing, Dave. The Marxist Theory of Art. Sussex: Harvester Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. Lenin: Collected Works, Vol. 36. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1966.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. ‘Party Organization and Party Literature’, in Socialist Realism in Literature and Art: A Collection of Articles, compiled by Parkhomenko, M. and Miasnikov, A., trans. James, C. V.. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1971. 23–4.Google Scholar
Lindley, Mark. ‘Marx and Engels on Music’, Monthly Review Online, 18 August 2010. https://mronline.org/2010/08/18/marx-and-engels-on-music/ (accessed 18 January 2019).Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. ‘Die Sickingendebatte zwischen Marx, Engels und Lassalle’, in Die Eigenart des Ästhetischen, vol. 2. Munich: Lichterhand, 1963. 461–504.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Probleme der Ästhetik. Darmstadt: Lichterhand, 1969.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. ‘Béla Bartók: On the 25th Anniversary of his Death’. The New Hungarian Quarterly 41 (1971), 42–55.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, trans. Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Essays on Realism, trans. Fernbach, David. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mally, Lynn. The Proletkult Movement in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Maróthy, János. Music and the Bourgeois, Music and the Proletarian, trans. Róna, Eva. Budapest: Akademémiai Kiadó, 1974.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, trans and ed. Bottomore, T. B.. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Fowkes, Ben. New York: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Mathematical Manuscripts of Karl Marx, trans. Aronson, C. and Meo, M.. London: New Park Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Early Writings, trans. Livingstone, Rodney and Benton, Gregor. New York: Penguin, 1992.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft), trans. Nicolaus, Martin. New York: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
Mason, Paul. Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2015.Google Scholar
Memmot, Mark. ‘Occupy Wall Street Drummers Generate Loud Debate’, NPR, 25 October 2011. www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2011/10/25/141688703/occupy-wall-street-drummers-generate-loud-debate (accessed 18 January 2019).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Adventures of the Dialectic, trans. Bien, Joseph. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Moseley, Fred. Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx's Logic in Capital and the End of the ‘Transformation Problem’. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy and the World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Shaikh, Anwar. Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar