Article contents
The Development of Brecht's Theory of the Epic Theatre, 1918-1933
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2022
Extract
The theatre of today has been significantly changed because of Brecht's influential work as a playwright, producer, and theoretician. In fact, anyone working in the theatre of today must come to grips with the phenomenon that is Bertolt Brecht. True, such an undertaking will be difficult. Brecht's achievements—literary, theoretical, and practical—are all parts of a whole which is not understandable if one part of it is examined by itself. Furthermore, as he wrote in his poem “Behauptung,” Brecht by no means “always remained the same“; both the man and his views changed. For this reason an investigation of the development of Brecht's theatrical theories apart from the rest of his work is a questionable undertaking. There are, however, two justifications for it: 1) So far nothing coherent about Brecht's early ideas concerning the theatre has been written.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1961 The Tulane Drama Review
References
Notes
As it originally appeared in Theater der Zeit (Studien, Nos. 9 and 10), 1958 this article had over 200 footnotes. Because of limitations of space and the awareness that most of the sources mentioned in these notes would be unavailable to our readers, the editors have cut or revised all but the most important of them. Anyone interested in checking the original notes is urged to refer to the German text.
1 Film-Kurier (November, 1928).
2 Schumacher, Ernst, Die dramatischen Versuche Bertolt Brechts 1918-1933, Berlin, 1955.Google Scholar
3 Augsburger Neueste Nachrichten, No. 60, 1918.
4 Hauber, Richard, “Theaterdirecktoren,” Das Stadttkeater Augsburg, Augsburg (1927), 29.Google Scholar
5 The following excerpts come from Brecht's reviews in Der Volkswille. “
6 Iwan Goll, Der dramatische Wille, No. 6.
7 Geis, Jacob, “Bertolt Brecht,” Theater-Zeitung der Staatlichen Bühnen Münchens (1923), 19-22.Google Scholar
8 Das Kunstblatt, Potsdam (May, 1923), 156.
9 Jhering, Herbert, Berliner Dramaturgie, Berlin, 1947.Google Scholar
10 Vossische Zeitung, Berlin (April, 1926).
11 Berliner Börsen-Courier (June, 1926).
12 Berliner Börsen-Courier (December, 1925).
13 Berliner Börsen-Courier (July, 1926).
14 Der Sport, Heidelberg (1928), 146.
15 Berliner Börsen-Courier (May, 1925).
16 Müno, Kurt, Die neue Zeit (April, 1927), 5.Google Scholar
17 Jacobs, Monty, “Das Theaterproblem der Gegenwart,” Die Scene, Berlin, No. 1 (January, 1926), 10.Google Scholar
18 Op. Cit. p. 131 ff.
19 “Fragmentarische Aufzeichnung des Kölner Rundfunkgesprächs zwischen Bertolt Brecht, Ernst Hardt, Herbert Jhering und Fritz Sternberg,” Bertolt-Brecht-Archiv.
20 Der Scheinwerfer, Essen, No. 6/7 (December, 1929), 5 f.
21 Die literarische Welt, Berlin, No. 13 (March 23, 1930).
22 “Sollten wir nicht die Aesthetik liquidieren?” Berliner Börsen-Courier, No. 253 (June 2, 1927).
23 , Marx, Das Kapital, Vol. I, Berlin(1953), p. 512 f.Google Scholar
24 Frankfurter Zeitung, Literaturblatt (November 27, 1927).
25 “Der Mann am Regiepult,” Das Theater, Berlin, No. 1 (1928), 8.
26 “Ueber Stoffe und Form,” Berliner Börsen-Courier, No. 151 (March 31, 1929).
27 “Letzte Etappe: Oedipus,” Berliner Börsen-Courier, No. 51 (February 1, 1929).
28 Frankfurter Zeitung, Literaturblatt (November 27, 1927).
29 “Fragmentarische Aufzeichnung des Kölner Rundfunkgesprächs zwischen Bertolt Brecht, Ernst Hardt, Herbert Jhering und Fritz Sternberg,” Bertolt-Brecht-Archiv.
30 , Marx/, Engels, Ausgewählte Briefe, Berlin (1953), p. 560.Google Scholar
31 Uhu, Berlin, No. 3 (December, 1930), 24.
32 Die Scene, No. 6 (June, 1931), 175.
33 “Dreigroschenprozess,” Versuche, No. 3, p. 280.
34 , Brecht, Stücke, Vol. III, p. 275.Google Scholar Quoted from Freud, Das Unbehagen in der Kultur.
35 Kafka, Gustav, Aristoteles, München (1922), p. 174.Google Scholar
36 In:, Brecht, Schriften zum Theater. Ueber eine nicht-aristotelische Dramatik, zusammengestellt von S. Unseld, Frankfurt a.M. (1957), p. 253.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by