Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:08:10.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symposium Foreword: Framing the Law and Policy for Ecosystem Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2013

Thoko Kaime
Thoko Kaime*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Leicester, Leicester (United Kingdom). Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Markets For Ecosystem Services
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 2013 , pp. 211 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gomez-Baggethun, E. et al. ., ‘The History of Ecosystems Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes’ (2010) 6 Ecological Economics, pp. 1209–18.Google Scholar

2 Chopra, K. et al. . (eds), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Policy Responses (Island Press, 2005), Vol. 3, at p. vii, available at: http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.772.aspx.pdf.Google Scholar

3 Gomez-Baggethun et al., n. 1 above.

4 See generally de Groot, R.S., ‘Environmental Functions as a Unifying Concept for Ecology and Economics’ (1987) 7(2) The Environmentalist, pp. 105–9Google Scholar; and Westman, W., ‘How Much are Nature’s Services Worth?’ (1977) 197(4307) Science, pp. 960–4.Google Scholar

5 See Perrings, C., Folke, C. & Miller, K.G., ‘The Ecology and Economics of Biodiversity Loss: The Research Agenda’ (1992) 21(3) Ambio, p. 201–11Google Scholar; Perrings, C.A. et al. . (eds), Biodiversity Loss: Ecological and Economic Issues (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See, e.g., Daily, G.C., Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Costanza, R. & Daly, H., ‘Natural Capital and Sustainable Development’ (1992) 6(1) Conservation Biology, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar

7 Costanza, R. et al. ., ‘The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital’ (1997) 387 Nature, pp. 253–60, at 259.Google Scholar

8 Heywood, V.H. (ed), Global Biodiversity Assessment (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

9 Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), 5 June 1992, in force 29 Dec. 1993, available at: http://www.cbd.int/convention/text.

10 Fisher, B., Turner, R. & Morling, P., ‘Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision-Making’ (2009) 68(3) Ecological Economics, pp. 643–53.Google Scholar

11 Stern, N., The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

12 See project website at: www.teebweb.org.

13 Landell-Mills, N. & Porras, I.T., Silver Bullet or Fool’s Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor (IIED, 2002).Google Scholar

14 See R. Bayon, Making Environmental Markets Work: Lessons from Early Experience with Sulfur, Carbon, Wetlands, and Other Related Markets, Forest Trends, Katoomba Group Meeting, Locarno (Switzerland), 2003 available at: http:www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_629.pdf.

15 See Grant, W., ‘Policy Instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy’ (2010) 33 West European Politics, pp. 22–38Google Scholar; Oskam, A.. ‘Understanding the Common Agricultural Policy’ (2012) 39(4) European Review of Agricultural Economics, pp. 735–8.Google Scholar

16 See Ellerman, A.D. & Buchner, B.K., ‘The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results’ (2007) 1(1) Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, pp. 66–87.Google Scholar

17 See Daily, n. 6 above.

18 Reid, C.T, ‘Between Priceless and Worthless: Challenges in Using Market Mechanisms for Conserving Biodiversity’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 217–33.Google Scholar

19 Salzman, J. & Ruhl, J.B., ‘Currencies and Commodification of Environmental Law’ (2000–01) 53 Stanford Law Review, pp. 607–94.Google Scholar

20 Penca, J., ‘Marketing the Market: The Ideology of Market Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 235–57.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 235.

22 Glicksman, R.L. & Kaime, T., ‘A Comparative Analysis of Accountability Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services Markets in the United States and the European Union’ (2013) 2(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 259–83.Google Scholar