Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2020
In light of the accelerating nature of climate change and its effect, it is unsurprising that various entities increasingly resort to courts and tribunals to seek to address the many harms and wrongs that clearly stem from climate change. This article discusses the opportunities in this context for those who face displacement by the effects of climate change, an issue that is not necessarily at the heart of either climate justice debates or climate displacement debates. Discussions about how to respond to displacement arising in the context of climate change often focus on the ‘protection space’ or ‘assistance space’, in which those affected are conceptualized as actual or potential seekers of protection or assistance, who may or may not be owed refuge elsewhere on account of unmet needs for shelter, support or safety. This article takes a different approach and conceptualizes those affected as potential or actual seekers of justice, who may be owed rectification for inflicted harm. The article thus contributes to emerging scholarship concerning climate change litigation and climate harm reversal, by focusing on the corrective justice potential for those who face the specific issue of displacement stemming from climate change. To this end, the article provides the relevant practical and analytical background, and discusses key recent law and policy developments in both the domestic and cross-border spheres. The article considers not merely the nexus between displacement stemming from climate change and considerations of justice, but also how and where justice in this context is or may be sought.
I wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers of this article for valuable feedback.
1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ‘Policymaker Summary of Working Group II (Potential Impacts of Climate Change)’, in Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments (IPCC, 1992), pp. 87–113, at 103, para 5.0.10, available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_full_report.pdf.
2 E.g., O. Milman, ‘Meet the “Climate Refugees” Who Already Had to Leave Their Homes’, The Guardian, 24 Sept. 2018, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/24/climate-refugees-new-orleans-houston-hurricane-katrina-hurricane-harvey.
3 Farbotko, C., ‘Wishful Sinking: Disappearing Islands, Climate Refugees and Cosmopolitan Experimentation’ (2010) 51(1) Asia Pacific Viewpoint, pp. 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 See, e.g., L. Taylor, ‘“Where Is the Justice?” Ask Climate “Refugees” Sidelined from Global Deal’, Reuters, 6 Dec. 2017, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fiji-climatechange-migration/where-is-the-justice-ask-climate-refugees-sidelined-from-global-deal-idUSKBN1E01XG.
5 Paris (France), 12 Dec. 2015, in force 4 Nov. 2016 available at: http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php.
6 Taylor, n. 4 above.
7 350.org, ‘On International Migrants Day, We Must Remember that Standing for Climate Justice Means Standing for Migrant Justice’, 2018, available at: https://350.org/migration-justice/?akid=61696.3382245.-6d_oA&rd=1&t=6.
8 Mary Robinson Foundation – Climate Justice, ‘Protecting the Rights of Climate Displaced People’, Position Paper, June 2016, available at: https://www.mrfcj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Protecting-the-Rights-of-Climate-Displaced-People-Position-Paper.pdf.
9 Nardin, T., Law, Morality and the Relations of States (Princeton University Press, 1983), p. 257Google Scholar.
10 E.g., ‘UK Parliament Declares Climate Change Emergency’, BBC News, 1 May 2019, available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48126677.
11 United Nations (UN) Secretary-General, ‘Secretary-General's Remarks on Climate Change’, 10 Sept. 2018, available at: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2018-09-10/secretary-generals-remarks-climate-change-delivered.
12 E.g., Robinson, M., Climate Justice (Bloomsbury, 2018)Google Scholar.
13 McAdam, J., Climate Change, Forced Migration and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 See, e.g., IPCC (V. Masson-Delmotte et al., (eds)), Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (IPCC, 2018).
15 IPCC, ‘Summary for Policy Makers’, in IPCC, ibid., s. B.5.1.
16 Ibid.
17 E.g., McAdam, J. (ed.), Climate Change and Displacement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Hart, 2012)Google Scholar.
18 IPCC, ‘Summary for Policymakers’, in IPCC (Stocker, T.F. et al. (eds)), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 3–29, at 5Google Scholar.
19 See, e.g., Mitchell, D. et al. , ‘Extreme Heat-Related Mortality Avoided under Paris Agreement Goals’ (2018) 8(7) Nature Climate Change, pp. 551–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
20 W.N. Adger et al., ‘Human Security’, in IPCC (Field, C.B. et al. (eds)), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 755–91, at 767Google Scholar.
21 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, ‘Total Annual New Displacement’ (2019) available at: https://www.internal-displacement.org/database/displacement-data. Note that large numbers of people can be displaced by relatively small numbers of events.
22 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre and Norwegian Refugee Council, ‘Global Estimates 2015: People Displaced by Disasters’, July 2015, p. 22, available at: https://www.internal-displacement.org/publications/global-estimates-2015-people-displaced-by-disasters.
23 Adger et al., n. 20 above, p. 767.
24 Ibid., pp. 768ff.
25 See, e.g., Foresight, ‘Migration and Global Environmental Change: Final Report’, UK Government Science Office, 20 Oct. 2011; see also Piggott-McKellar, A.E. et al. , ‘Moving People in a Changing Climate: Lessons from Two Case Studies in Fiji’ (2019) 8(5) Social Science, pp. 133–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Foresight, ibid.
27 Ibid., p. 9.
28 Black, R. et al. , ‘Migration, Immobility and Displacement Outcomes Following Extreme Events’ (2013) 27(Suppl 1) Environmental Science & Policy, pp. S32–S43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 Black, R. & Collyer, M., ‘Populations “Trapped” at Times of Crisis’ (2014) 45 Forced Migration Review, pp. 52–6Google Scholar.
30 Though some may move once the immediate impacts of a disaster or climatic event have subsided: see, e.g., Black et al., n. 28 above, p. S35.
31 Black & Collyer, n. 29 above, p. 54.
32 Farborko, C., ‘Voluntary Immobility: Indigenous Voices in the Pacific’ (2018) 57 Forced Migration Review, pp. 81–3Google Scholar.
33 S. Ayeb-Karlsson, C.D. Smith & D. Kniveton, ‘The Conceptual Birth of Trapped Populations and the Danger of Using It as a Policy Tool’, TransRe, 26 Sept. 2018, available at: http://transre.org/index.php/blog/conceptual-birth-trapped-populations-and-danger-using-it-policy-tool.
34 As well as other creatures: see, e.g., Garner, R., A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 See, e.g., Plato, The Republic, trans. B. Jowett (ebook@Adelaide, 2012), p. 331e.
36 Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, trans. D. Ross (Oxford University Press, 1954), p. 111.
37 Ibid.
38 Malin, M.H., ‘The Distributive and Corrective Justice Concerns in the Debate over the Employment at Will: Some Preliminary Concerns’ (1992) 68(1) Chicago-Kent Law Review, pp. 117–46Google Scholar.
39 See, e.g., Klimchuck, D., ‘On the Autonomy of Corrective Justice’ (2003) 23(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 49–64, at 49 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Benson, P., ‘The Basis of Corrective Justice and Its Relation to Distributive Justice’ (1992) 77 Iowa Law Review, pp. 515–615, at 515Google Scholar.
40 Aristotle, n. 39 above, p. 115.
41 Weinrib, E.J., ‘Corrective Justice in a Nutshell’ (2002) 52(4) The University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 349–56, at 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
42 Englard, I., Corrective and Distributive Justice: From Aristotle to Modern Times (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.
43 Ibid, pp. 18ff.
44 Ibid.
45 Weinrib, E.J., ‘Corrective Justice’ (1992) 77 Iowa Law Review, pp. 403–26, at 410Google Scholar.
46 Coleman, J., ‘Tort Law and the Demands of Corrective Justice’ (1992) 67(2) Indiana Law Journal, pp. 349–79, at 352Google Scholar.
47 Piggott-McKellar et al., n. 25 above.
48 See, e.g., Cernea, M.M. & Mathur, H. Mohan (eds), Can Compensation Prevent Impoverishment? Reforming Resettlement through Investment and Benefit-Sharing (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.
49 Hampton, J., ‘Defining Wrong and Defining Rape’, in Burgess-Jackson, K. (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 118–56, at 120Google Scholar.
50 Serdeczny, O., Waters, E. & Chan, S., Non-Economic Loss and Damage in the Context of Climate Change: Understanding the Challenges (German Development Institute, 2016), p. 1Google Scholar; Becker, S.O. & Ferrara, A., ‘Consequences of Forced Migration: A Survey of Recent Findings’ (2019) 59 Labour Economics, pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 Hwang, S.-S. Shong et al. , ‘Anticipation of Migration and Psychological Stress and the Three Gorges Dam Project in China’ (2007) 65(5) Social Science and Medicine, pp. 1012–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 Heslin, A. et al. , ‘Displacement and Resettlement: Understanding the Role of Climate Change in Contemporary Migration’, in Mechler, R. et al. (eds), Loss and Damage from Climate Change (Springer, 2019), pp. 237–58, at 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
53 Ibid.
54 See, e.g., Thornton, F., Climate Change and People on the Move: International Law and Justice (Oxford University Press, 2018), Ch. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neumayer, E., ‘In Defense of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions’ (2000) 33(2) Ecological Economics, pp. 185–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Page, E.A., ‘Distributing the Burdens of Climate Change’ (2008) 17(4) Environmental Politics, pp. 556–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Farber, D.A., ‘The Case for Climate Change Compensation: Justice for Climate Change Victims in a Complex World’ (2008) 2 Utah Law Review, pp. 377–413, at 395 ffGoogle Scholar.
55 Although it may be increasingly less plausible to argue the latter point: see, e.g., D. Hasemayer, ‘U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Block Exxon Climate Fraud Investigation’, Inside Climate News, 7 Jan. 2019, available at: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07012019/exxon-climate-fraud-investigation-supreme-court-ruling-massachusetts-attorney-general-healey.
56 R.A. James et al., ‘Attribution: How Is It Relevant to Loss and Damage Policy and Practice’, in Mechler et al., n. 52 above, pp. 113–54.
57 F. Otto, R. James & M. Allen, ‘The Science of Attributing Extreme Weather Events and Its Potential Contribution to Assessing Loss and Damage Associated with Climate Change’, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, 2014, available at: https://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/workstreams/loss_and_damage/application/pdf/attributingextremeevents.pdf; also National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Attribution of Extreme Events in the Context of Climate Change (National Academies Press, 2016).
58 Marjanac, S. & Patton, L., ‘Extreme Weather Event Attribution Science and Climate Change Litigation: An Essential Step in the Causal Chain’ (2018) 36(3) Journal of Energy and Natural Resource Law, pp. 265–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
59 Lazar, S.M., ‘Corrective Justice and the Possibility of Rectification’ (2008) 11(4) Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, pp. 355–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
60 See, e.g., R. Bronen, ‘Climate-Induced Displacement of Alaska Native Communities’, Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement, 30 Jan. 2013; also K. Mandel, ‘In Alaska, a Town Threatened by Climate Change Gets Federal Funding to Relocate’, ThinkProgress, 23 Mar. 2018, available at: https://thinkprogress.org/newtok-alaska-gets-relocation-funding-35b4434242a6.
61 See, e.g., United States Army Corps of Engineers – Alaska District, ‘Alaska Village Erosion Technical Assistance Program’, Apr. 2006, available at: http://www.housemajority.org/coms/cli/AVETA_Report.pdf.
62 A. York, ‘Alaskan Village Stands on Leading Edge of Climate Change’, 29 Dec. 2009, available at: https://poweringanation.unc.edu/alaskan-village-stands-on-leading-edge-of-climate-change/#:~:text=Alaskan%20village%20stands%20on%20leading%20edge%20of%20climate%20change,-Reporters%20Anna%20York&text=As%20Newtok's%20tribal%20administrator%2C%20he,of%20frozen%20soil%20called%20permafrost.
63 E.g., C. Welch, ‘Climate Change Has Finally Caught up to This Alaska Village’, National Geographic, 22 Oct. 2019, available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/10/climate-change-finally-caught-up-to-this-alaska-village.
64 Ibid.
65 See, e.g., Pevec, D., ‘The Marshall Islands Nuclear Claims Tribunal: The Claims of the Enewetak People’ (2006) 35(1) Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, pp. 221–37Google Scholar.
66 Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands, signed 2 Apr. 1947, in force 18 July 1947, Art. 6, available at: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/b-un-ust000012-0951.pdf.
67 Pevec, n. 65 above, p. 228.
68 See Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Marshall Islands for the Implementation of Section 177 of the Compact of Free Association, 25 June 1983, in force 21 Oct. 1986; further details in US Department of State, ‘Report Evaluating the Request of the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands Presented to the Congress of the United States of America’, Nov. 2004, available at: https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rpt/40422.htm.
69 Pevec, n. 65 above, pp. 231ff.
70 Tamondong, S.D., ‘Can Improved Resettlement Reduce Poverty?’, in Cernea, M.M. & Mathur, H.M. (eds), Can Compensation Prevent Impoverishment? Reforming Resettlement through Investment and Benefit-Sharing (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 394–417Google Scholar.
71 Heming, L., Waley, P. & Rees, P., ‘Reservoir Resettlement in China: Past Experience and the Three Gorges Dam’ (2001) 167(3) The Geographical Journal, pp. 195–212, at 200CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
72 Burger, M. & Gundlach, J., The Status of Climate Change Litigation: A Global Review (United Nations Environment Programme, 2017), p. 20Google Scholar.
73 E.g., Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands [2015] HAZA C/09/00456689; upheld on appeal in late 2018, and again in the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019; more information on the trajectory of the case and English translation of court findings is available at: https://www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case. See also van Zeben, J., ‘Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: Will Urgenda Turn the Tide?’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 339–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mayer, B., ‘The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Ruling of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (9 October 2018)’ (2019) 8(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 167–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The Supreme Court decision in Urgenda, in particular, is heavily grounded in human rights obligations, including those arising under the European Convention on Human Rights (i.e., right to life); more on rights dimensions below. Also Robert, M. et al. , ‘Transboundary Climate Challenge to Coal: One Small Step Against Dirty Energy, One Giant Leap for Climate Justice’, in Gerrard, M.B. & Wannier, G.E. (eds), Threatened Island Nations: Legal Implications of Rising Seas and a Changing World (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 589–626Google Scholar.
74 Though there have been some determinations concerning the consequences of adaptation measures: see, e.g., Burger & Gundlach, n. 72 above.
75 Note also the pursuit of legal avenues that do not revolve around corrective justice: e.g., J. McAdam, ‘No “Climate Refugees” in New Zealand’, Brookings Institution, 13 Aug. 2014, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/planet policy/2014/08/13/no-climate-refugees-in-new-zealand.
76 E.g., Morel, M., Stavropoulou, M. & Durieux, J.-F., ‘The History and Status of the Right Not To Be Displaced’ (2012) 41 Forced Migration Review, pp. 5–7Google Scholar; Morel, M., The Right Not To Be Displaced in International Law (Intersentia, 2014)Google Scholar.
77 Lliuya v. RWE A.G., Az. 2 O 285/15 Essen Regional Court (2015); unofficial English translations of relevant court documents at Germanwatch, ‘Court Documents of the Case of Huarez’, 13 Dec. 2017, available at: https://germanwatch.org/en/14841.
78 W. Frank, C. Bals & J. Grimm, ‘The Case of Huarez: First Climate Lawsuit on Loss and Damage Against an Energy Company Before German Courts’, in Mechler et al., n. 52 above, pp. 475–82.
79 Germanwatch, General Ruling of the Civil High Court in Hamm: Corporate Responsibility for Climate Change Impacts Exists in German Law – Depending on Evidence in Any Specific Case to Show Responsibility, 2017, p. 2, available at: https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/announcement/20810.pdf.
80 Domestic: e.g., Kivalina v. ExxonMobil, 696 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2012,) which stumbled over the ‘political question doctrine’ (by which courts hold that certain issues pose political and not legal questions); international: e.g., Jacobs, R.E., ‘Treading Deep Waters: Substantive Law Issues in Tuvalu's Threat to Sue the United States in the International Court of Justice’ (2005) 14(1) Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, pp. 103–28Google Scholar.
81 Germanwatch, ‘The “Huaraz Case” at a Glance’, updated 5 June 2020, available at: https://germanwatch.org/en/huaraz.
82 On the relevance of certain human rights norms, see also J. McAdam, ‘Climate Change Displacement and International Law: Complementary Protection Standards’, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), May 2011, available at: https://www.unhcr.org/4dff16e99.pdf.
83 E.g., Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship between Climate Change and Human Rights’ (15 Jan. 2009), UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61; also Humphreys, S. (ed.), Human Rights and Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.
84 D. Carrington, ‘“Climate Apartheid”: UN Expert Says Human Rights May Not Survive’, The Guardian, 25 June 2019, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/25/climate-apartheid-united-nations-expert-says-human-rights-may-not-survive-crisis.
85 Bogota (Colombia), 2 May 1948, available at: https://www.oas.org/dil/access_to_information_human_right_American_Declaration_of_the_Rights_and_Duties_of_Man.pdf; Petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States, 7 Dec. 2005, available at: http://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/petition-to-the-interamerican-commission-on-human-rights-onbehalf-of-the-inuit-circumpolar-conference.pdf; for analysis see, e.g., J. Harrington, ‘Climate Change, Human Rights, and the Right to be Cold’ (2007) 18(3) Fordham Environmental Law Review, pp. 513–35.
86 Commission on Human Rights, Republic of the Philippines, Petition Requesting for Investigation of the Responsibility of the Carbon Majors for Human Rights Violations or Threats of Violations Resulting from the Impact of Climate Change, Case No. CHR-NI-2016-0001, available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/philippines/press/1237/the-climate-change-and-human-rights-petition.
87 Ibid., p. 7 (and throughout).
88 Respondent LafargeHolcim's Manifestation Ad Cautelam (Without Any Acceptance or Submission to Jurisdiction), 15 Sept. 2016, p. 2, available at: https://www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/Lafarge%20Holcim%20Response.pdf.
89 Amnesty International, ‘Philippines: Landmark Decision by Human Rights Commission Paves Way for Climate Litigation’, 9 Dec. 2019, available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/12/landmark-decision-by-philippines-human-rights-commission-paves-way-for-climate-litigation/?fbclid=IwAR02dN5HX1EPY1_Q27UtEDbhw1HP1PReWLnfa7BqmnTIwG8e4G_Fl8PYWg4; I. Kaminski, ‘Fossil Fuel Firms “Could Be Sued” for Climate Change’, Independent, 9 Dec. 2019, available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/cop25-madrid-climate-change-greta-thunberg-fossil-fuel-lawsuit-a9239601.html?fbclid=IwAR2NyneKfakGUcWYXHF7_IgIr16L_Bm5kuEN8Rld2Gd-rQCsmp_w9EeKj-0; the relevant Commission report has not yet been published.
90 Kaminski, ibid.
91 Ibid.
92 New York, NY (US), 16 Dec. 1966, in force 23 Mar. 1976, available at: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf.
93 H. Cross, ‘It's a National First. A Global First. Torres Strait Islanders Are Taking Legal Action Over the Federal Government's Failure to Act on Climate Change’, National Indigenous Times, 29 May 2019, available at: https://nit.com.au/its-a-national-first-a-global-first-torres-strait-islanders-are-taking-legal-action-over-the-federal-governments-failure-to-act-on-climate-change.
94 Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment No. 36 on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the Right to Life’ (30 Oct. 2018), UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36, pp. 14–5.
95 New York, NY (US), 9 May 1992, in force 21 Mar. 1994, available at: http://unfccc.int.
96 Decision 2/CP.19, ‘Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage Associated with Climate Change Impacts’ (11–23 Nov. 2013), UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1.
97 N. 5 above.
98 UNFCCC Secretariat, ‘Clearing House on Risk Transfer’, 2019, available at: http://unfccc-clearinghouse.org.
99 Decision 1/CP.21, ‘Adoption of the Paris Agreement’ (13 Dec. 2015), UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1, para. 49.
100 UNFCCC Secretariat, ‘Terms of Reference of the Task Force on Displacement’, 2017, paras 6(a) and (d), available at: http://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/groups_committees/loss_and_damage_executive_committee/application/pdf/tor_task_force.pdf.
101 UNFCCC Secretariat, ‘Task Force on Displacement: Plan of Action for 2019–2021’, in ‘Report of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage Associated with Climate Change Impacts – Addendum’ (15 Nov. 2019), UN Doc. FCCC/SB/2019/5/Add.1.
102 Ibid., p. 10.
103 Decision 1/CP.21, n. 99 above, para. 52.
104 Thornton, n. 54 above, Ch. 6.
105 A. Markandya & M. Gonzales-Eguino, ‘Integrated Assessment for Identifying Climate Finance Needs for Loss and Damage: A Critical Review’, in Mechler et al., n. 52 above, pp. 343–62.
106 Art. 9.
107 See, e.g., Thornton, n. 54 above, Ch. 6; also various contributions in Pickering, J., Betzold, C. & Skovgaard, J., ‘Special Issue: Managing Fragmentation and Complexity in the Emerging System of International Climate Finance’ (2017) 17 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
108 See, e.g., UNFCCC Secretariat, ‘Introduction to Climate Finance’, 2020, available at: https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-finance/the-big-picture/introduction-to-climate-finance.
109 Decision 3/CP.17, ‘Launching the Green Climate Fund’ (11 Dec. 2011), UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, paras 2 and 3.
110 Ibid., Annex, paras 29 and 30.
111 See, e.g., ‘Roadmap to US$100 Billion’ (2016), available at: https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/climate-finance-roadmap-to-us100-billion.pdf.
112 Climate Funds Update, ‘The Green Climate Fund’ (2019), available at: https://climatefundsupdate.org/publications/the-green-climate-fund-2019.
113 Sen, A., The Idea of Justice (Harvard University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
114 E.g., Suliman, S. et al. , ‘Indigenous (Im)mobilities in the Anthropocene’ (2019) 14(3) Mobilities, pp. 298–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar.