Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:17:41.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Climate Policy Work, by Danny Cullenward and David G. Victor Polity, 2020, 256 pp, £55 hb, £15.99 pb, £14.99 ebk ISBN 9781509541799 hb, 9781509541805 pb, 9781509541812 ebk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

Amelia Reiver Schlusser
Amelia Reiver Schlusser*
Affiliation:
Lewis & Clark Law School, Portland, OR (US)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , November 2021 , pp. 571 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Tietenberg, T.H., Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice, 2nd edn (RFF Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Ackerman, B. & Stewart, R.B., ‘Reforming Environmental Law’ (1985) 37(5) Stanford Law Review, pp. 1333–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See Driesen, D.M., ‘Free Lunch or Cheap Fix: The Emissions Trading Idea and the Climate Change Convention’ (1998) 26(1) Boston College Environment Affairs Law Review, pp. 1–88Google Scholar; McAllister, L.K., ‘Beyond Playing Banker: The Role of the Regulatory Agency in Emissions Trading’ (2007) 59(2) Administrative Law Review, pp. 269–313Google Scholar.

3 Boyd, W., ‘The Poverty of Theory: Public Problems, Instrument Choice, and the Climate Emergency’ (2021) 46(2) Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 399–487Google Scholar, at 461–7.

4 See Ranson, M. & Stavins, R.N., ‘Linkage of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems: Learning from Experience’ (2016) 16(3) Climate Policy, pp. 284–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mehling, M.A., Metcalf, G.E. & Stavins, R.N., ‘Linking Climate Polities to Advance Global Mitigation’ (2018) 359(6379) Science, pp. 997–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC [2003] OJ L 275/32.

6 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (State of California).

7 See Western Climate Initiative (WCI), ‘Design Summary: Design for the WCI Regional Program’, 27 July 2010, available at: https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/changements/carbone/documents-WCI/cadre-mise-en-oeuvre-WCI-en.pdf; Arup, C. & Zhang, H., ‘Lessons from Regulating Carbon Offset Markets’ (2015) 4(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 69–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 RGGI, ‘Overview of RGGI CO2 Budget Trading Program’, available at: http://www.rggi.org/docs/program_summary_10_07.pdf.