Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:22:16.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate Change and the Voiceless: Protecting Future Generations, Wildlife, and Natural Resources, by Randall S. Abate Cambridge University Press, 2019, 245 pp, £84.99 hb, £26.99 pb, $28.00 ebk ISBN 9781108480116 hb, 9781108703222 pb, 9781108571876 ebk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Lisa Benjamin
Lisa Benjamin*
Affiliation:
Lewis & Clark Law School, Portland, OR (United States)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 379 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weiss, E. Brown, ‘In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity (Transnational, 1989)Google Scholar.

2 Stone, C.D., Should Trees Have Standing? And Other Essays on Law, Morals and the Environment, 3rd edn (Oceana Publications, 2010)Google Scholar.

3 Singer, P., Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals (Harper Collins, 1975)Google Scholar.

4 IPCC, ‘Summary for Policymakers’, in Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (IPCC, 2018).

5 Paris (France), 13 Dec. 2015, in force 4 Nov. 2016, available at: http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php.

6 Sachs, N., ‘The Paris Agreement in the 2020s: Breakdown or Breakup?’ (2019) 46(3) Ecology Law Quarterly, pp. 865–910Google Scholar; S. Sengupta, ‘U.N. Climate Talks End With Few Commitments and a “Lost” Opportunity’, The New York Times, 15 Dec. 2019, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/15/climate/cop25-un-climate-talks-madrid.html.

7 Diaz, S. et al. , Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policy Makers (IPBES, 2019), pp. 12–5Google Scholar, available at: https://ipbes.net/news/ipbes-global-assessment-summary-policymakers-pdf.

8 Setzer, J. & Vanhala, L.C., ‘Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance’ (2019) 10(3) WIREs Climate ChangeCrossRefGoogle Scholar online articles, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcc.580.

9 Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Environment and Human Rights, 15 Nov. 2017.

10 Stichting Urgenda v. Government of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment), Rechtbank Den Haag, 24 June 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196, para. 4.36, English translation available at: http://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196. See also van Zeben, J., ‘Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: Will Urgenda Turn the Tide?’ (2015) 4(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 339–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mayer, B., ‘The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Ruling of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (9 October 2018)’ (2019) 8(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 167–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Ashgar Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan, Case No. 25501/2015, Lahore High Court, Order of 4 Sept. 2015, available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/litigation/ashgar-leghari-v-federation-of-pakistan-lahore-high-court-green-bench-2015. See also Peel, J. & Osofsky, H.M., ‘A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?’ (2018) 7(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Swiss Senior Women for Climate Protection v. Swiss Federal Council et al., filed 25 Oct. 2016, English translation available at: http://klimaseniorinnen.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/request_KlimaSeniorinnen.pdf.

13 People v. Arctic Oil, Case No. 16-166674TVI-OTIR/06, Oslo Dist. Ct., 4 Jan. 2018.

14 Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines, Petition Requesting an Investigation of the Responsibility of the Carbon Majors for Human Rights Violations or Threats of Violations Resulting from the Impacts of Climate Change, Case No. CHR-NI-2016-0001, Submission in Support of Petitioners, 16 Dec. 2016, available at: https://climate.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Wentz-and-Burger-2016-12-Submission-Case-No.-CHR-NI-2016-0001.pdf.

15 Law of the Rights of Mother Earth, Law No. 071, 7 Dec. 2010, Art. 3 (Bolivia). See also Calzadilla, P. Villavicencio & Kotzé, L.J., ‘Living in Harmony with Nature? A Critical Appraisal of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia’ (2018) 7(3) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 397–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, ‘Ponca Nation of Oklahoma to recognize the Rights of Nature to Ban Fracking’, 29 Jan. 2018, available at: http://therightsofnature.org/ponca-rights-of-nature.

17 Friends of the Earth Australia, ‘Legal Personality for Great Barrier Reef’, available at: https://www.foe.org.au/legal-personality-great-barrier-reef.

18 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370h.