Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:33:15.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANTI-SOCIALISM, LIBERALISM AND INDIVIDUALISM: RETHINKING THE REALIGNMENT OF SCOTTISH POLITICS, 1945–1970

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

Malcolm Petrie
Malcolm Petrie*
Affiliation:
David Berry Prize Winner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative interpretation of Scottish politics between 1945 and 1970, a period that witnessed the decline of a once-powerful Unionist tradition, the revival of Liberalism and the rise of the Scottish National party (SNP). While existing accounts have focused principally upon social and economic factors, this study foregrounds the role of ideology and rhetoric. During the 1940s and early 1950s, Scottish Unionists were, like their Conservative colleagues elsewhere in Britain, able to construct a popular, but essentially negative, anti-socialist coalition that prioritised the defence of individual liberty. This electoral alliance, defined by opposition to Labour's programme of nationalisation and expressed via an individualist idiom, was able to attract broad support; it was, however, always provisional, and proved increasingly difficult to sustain after the Conservative party returned to office in 1951. It was, this paper suggests, the fragmenting of this anti-socialist coalition in the late 1950s and early 1960s that created the opportunity for both the Liberals and the SNP to present alternative renderings of this individualist appeal, and to emerge as credible political alternatives. Crucially, by the 1960s, individual liberty was beginning to be understood in constitutional rather than economic terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 28 , December 2018 , pp. 197 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to acknowledge the generous support offered by the award of an early career fellowship by the Leverhulme Trust (ECF–2015–391), which facilitated the research that informs this article.

References

1 The name was a legacy of the 1912 merger with the Liberal Unionists. See Burness, C., ‘Strange Associations’: The Irish Question and the Making of Scottish Unionism, 1886–1918 (East Linton, 2003)Google Scholar.

2 Miller, W. L., The End of British Politics? Scots and English Political Behaviour in the Seventies (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar; Hutchison, I. G. C., Scottish Politics in the Twentieth Century (Basingstoke, 2001), 98–139Google Scholar; Cameron, E. A., Impaled upon a Thistle: Scotland since 1880 (Edinburgh, 2010), 263–319Google Scholar.

3 Kellas, J. G., ‘The Party in Scotland’, in Conservative Century: The Conservative Party since 1900, ed. Seldon, A. and Ball, S. (Oxford, 1994), 671–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Finlay, R. J., A Partnership for Good? Scottish Politics and the Union since 1880 (Edinburgh, 1997)Google Scholar; Finlay, R. J., ‘Unionism and the Dependency Culture: Politics and State Intervention in Scotland, 1918–1997’, in Unionist Scotland, 1800–1997, ed. MacDonald, C. M. M. (Edinburgh, 1998), 100–16Google Scholar; Finlay, R. J., ‘Patriotism, Paternalism and Pragmatism: Scottish Toryism, Union and Empire, 1912–65’, in Whatever Happened to Tory Scotland?, ed. Torrance, D. (Edinburgh, 2012), 29–42Google Scholar. For contrasting interpretations of the impact of empire, see Devine, T. M., ‘The Break-up of Britain? Scotland and the End of Empire’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 16 (2006), 163–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nielsen, J. O. and Ward, S., ‘“Cramped and Restricted at Home”? Scottish Separatism at Empire's End’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 25 (2015), 159–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Kendrick, S. and McCrone, D., ‘Politics in a Cold Climate: The Conservative Decline in Scotland’, Political Studies, 37 (1989), 589–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Mitchell, J., The Conservatives and the Union (Edinburgh, 1990)Google Scholar; Seawright, D. and Curtice, J., ‘The Decline of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, 1950–1992: Religion, Ideology or Economics?’, Contemporary Record, 9 (1995), 319–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Seawright, D., ‘Scottish Unionist Party: What's in a Name?’, Scottish Affairs, 14 (1996), 90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Seawright, D., An Important Matter of Principle: The Decline of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party (Aldershot, 1999)Google Scholar. See also Finlay, Partnership for Good, 139–40; Harvie, C., No Gods and Precious Few Heroes, 3rd edn (Edinburgh, 1998), 108–9Google Scholar; Cragoe, M., ‘“We Like Local Patriotism”: The Conservative Party and the Discourse of Decentralisation, 1947–51’, English Historical Review, 122 (2007), 965–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Smyth, J. J., ‘Resisting Labour: Unionists, Liberals, and Moderates in Glasgow between the Wars’, Historical Journal, 46 (2003), 375–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cameron, Impaled upon a Thistle, 163–8.

7 Greenleaf, W. H., The British Political Tradition, ii: The Ideological Heritage (1983), 263–346Google Scholar.

8 See Ramsden, J., The Age of Churchill and Eden, 1940–1957 (1995), 166–76Google Scholar; Green, E. H. H., The Ideologies of Conservatism: Conservative Political Ideas in the Twentieth Century (Oxford, 2002), 192–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Finlayson, A. and Martin, J., ‘“It Ain't What You Say…”: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric’, British Politics, 3 (2008), 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Barker, R., ‘Hooks and Hands, Interests and Enemies: Political Thinking as Political Action’, Political Studies, 48 (2000), 223–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Finlayson, A., ‘Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric’, Economy and Society, 33 (2011), 528–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Toye, R., Rhetoric (Oxford, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Toye, R., ‘Winston Churchill's “Crazy Broadcast”: Party, Nation, and the 1945 Gestapo Broadcast’, Journal of British Studies, 49 (2010), 655–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On Hayek's influence on the Conservative campaign, which came via the party chairman, Ralph Assheton, see Cockett, R., Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983 (1994), 91–9Google Scholar; Green, Ideologies of Conservatism, 219–20.

11 For key interventions, see P. Addison, The Road to 1945: British Politics and the Second World War (1975); Ramsden, J., ‘“A Party for Owners or a Party for Earners?” How far did the Conservative Party Really Change after 1945?’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 37 (1987), 49–63Google Scholar; Lowe, R., ‘The Second World War, Consensus and the Foundation of the Welfare State’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990), 152–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kavanagh, D., ‘The Post-War Consensus’, Twentieth Century British History, 3 (1992), 175–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Harrison, B., ‘The Rise, Fall and Rise of Political Consensus in Britain since 1940’, History, 84 (1999), 301–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Zweiniger-Bargielowska, I., ‘Rationing, Austerity and the Conservative Party Recovery after 1945’, Historical Journal, 37 (1994), 173–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, H., ‘A Bloodless Counter-Revolution: The Conservative Party and the Defence of Inequality, 1945–51’, in The Myth of Consensus, ed. Jones, H. and Kandiah, M. (Basingstoke, 1996), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Green, E. H. H., ‘The Conservative Party, the State and the Electorate, 1945–64’, in Party, State and Society: Electoral Behaviour in Britain since 1820, ed. Lawrence, J. and Taylor, M. (Aldershot, 1997), 176–200Google Scholar.

15 Green, Ideologies of Conservatism, 220. For a considered critique of this revisionist stance, see McKibbin, R., Parties and People: England, 1914–1951 (Oxford, 2010), 164–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Harvie, No Gods, 104, 108–9; Hutchison, Scottish Politics, 74; Finlay, ‘Unionism and the Dependency Culture’, 107–8. Although see the suggestive comments in: Cameron, Impaled upon a Thistle, 271–7.

17 National Library of Scotland (NLS) Acc. 10424/27: Scottish Unionist Association (SUA) Western Divisional Council (WDC), Annual Report 1948, 2–3. Capitalisation in original.

18 Perth and Kinross Council Archives MS 152/2/1/3: Kinross and West Perthshire Unionist Association minutes, 30 Nov. 1946 and 29 Nov. 1947. Capitalisation in original. Direction of labour was intended to ensure that those out of work were guided towards vacancies in productive, export-led industries.

19 Grangemouth Advertiser, 24 July 1948.

20 Falkirk Herald, 27 Nov. 1948.

21 Grangemouth Advertiser, 18 Dec. 1948.

22 Cowling, M., The Impact of Labour, 1920–1924 (Cambridge, 1971), 5Google Scholar.

23 See SUA, Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs (Edinburgh, 1949)Google Scholar.

24 National Union of Conservative Associations, The Right Road for Britain (1949), 7.

25 Harvie, No Gods, 108; Finlay, Partnership for Good, 139–40; Mitchell, Conservatives and the Union, 48–50; Mitchell, , The Scottish Question (Oxford, 2014), 55–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar and 79–85.

26 On the Covenant, see Mitchell, J., Strategies for Self-Government: The Campaigns for a Scottish Parliament (Edinburgh, 1996), 144–53Google Scholar; Levitt, I., ‘Britain, the Scottish Covenant Movement and Devolution, 1946–50’, Scottish Affairs, 22 (1998), 33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On MacCormick, see Petrie, M. R., ‘John MacCormick’, in SNP Leaders, ed. Mitchell, J. and Hassan, G. (2016), 43–63Google Scholar.

27 Cragoe, ‘“We Like Local Patriotism”’.

28 SUA, Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs (Edinburgh, 1949), 1–2Google Scholar.

29 Harvie, C., Scotland and Nationalism: Scottish Society and Politics, 1707–1994, 2nd edn (1994), 119Google Scholar.

30 NLS Acc. 10424/34: SUA WDC minutes, 4 Feb. 1948. On the Paisley by-election, see Dyer, M., ‘“A Nationalist in the Churchillian Sense”: John MacCormick, the Paisley By-election of 18 February 1948, Home Rule and the Crisis in Scottish Liberalism’, Parliamentary History, 22 (2003), 285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Ramsden, Age of Churchill and Eden, 197–205.

32 NLS Acc. 11368/4: SUA Central Council (CC) minutes, 2 Sept. 1947.

33 The only full study is D. Dutton, Liberals in Schism: A History of the National Liberal Party (2008).

34 Hutchison, Scottish Politics, 76–9.

35 From 1947 until 1956, the role of National Liberal chairman was performed by John Maclay; Maclay was succeeded by James Duncan, MP for South Angus, James Henderson-Stewart, MP for East Fife, and Colin Thornton-Kemsley, who represented North Angus and Mearns.

36 MacDonald, C. M. M., Whaur Extremes Meet: Scotland's Twentieth Century (Edinburgh, 2009), 205Google Scholar.

37 On interwar Unionism, see I. G. C. Hutchison, ‘Scottish Unionism between the Two World Wars’, in Unionist Scotland, ed. MacDonald, 82–4.

38 Green, ‘The Conservative Party, the State and the Electorate’, 192.

39 University of Dundee Archives (UDA) MS 309/2/2/3/1: South Angus Unionist and National Liberal Association, Forfar Branch, minutes, 11 Nov. 1949.

40 J. Maclay, Liberalism and the Present Situation (1950).

41 McKibbin, Parties and People, 167–9.

42 Conservative Party, General Election 1950: The Campaign Guide (1950), 580.

43 An offer Davies declined: Sloman, P., The Liberal Party and the Economy, 1929–1964 (Oxford, 2015), 185Google Scholar.

44 Dyer, M., ‘The Evolution of the Centre-Right and the State of Scottish Conservatism’, Political Studies, 49 (2001), 30–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; M. Dyer, ‘A Nationalist in the Churchillian Sense’.

45 Bodleian Library (BL) Conservative Party Archive (CPA) Conservative Central Office (CCO) 4/3/43: George Ramsay to Lord Woolton, 27 Nov. 1949. Capitalisation in original.

46 UDA MS 270/1/1/2: Dundee Unionist Association minutes, 10 Feb. 1948.

47 Dundee Courier and Advertiser, 31 Jan., 3 and 7 Feb. 1950. On the emergence of the housewives’ groups, see Hinton, J., ‘Militant Housewives: The British Housewives' League and the Attlee Government’, History Workshop, 28 (1994), 128–56Google Scholar.

48 Aberdeen Press and Journal, 20 Oct. 1951.

49 See the list in BL CPA CCO 4/3/319: A United Front against Socialism, 16 Apr. 1951.

50 Conservative Party, General Election 1955: The Campaign Guide (1955), 1.

51 Mitchell, Scottish Question, 79–85.

52 Green, Ideologies of Conservatism, 220; Ramsden, Age of Churchill and Eden, 294–303.

53 BL CPA CCO 2/3/18: Scottish Intelligence Summaries, Feb. 1953, Oct. 1955 and May 1956.

54 NLS Acc. 10424/27: SUA WDC, Annual Report 1956, 3. Capitalisation in original.

55 NLS Acc. 11368/4: SUA CC minutes, 4 July 1956. Capitalisation in original.

56 Ramsden, Age of Churchill and Eden, 294–303. On Liberal attempts to exploit middle-class discontent, see Sloman, Liberal Party and the Economy, 209–12.

57 Green, E. H. H., ‘The Treasury Resignations of 1958: A Reconsideration’, Twentieth Century British History, 11 (2000), 409–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 NLS Acc. 10424/36: SUA WDC Education and Propaganda Committee minutes, 25 Sept. 1956; Acc. 10424/50: SUA Eastern Divisional Council (EDC) minutes, 12 Dec. 1956; Acc. 11368/22: SUA EDC minutes, 11 Apr. 1958.

59 NLS Acc. 11368/22: SUA EDC minutes, 5 Oct. 1956.

60 NLS Acc. 11368/24: SUA EDC Executive Committee minutes, 17 June 1957.

61 NLS Acc. 11368/22: SUA EDC minutes, 4 Oct. 1957.

62 BL CPA CCO 1/12/552–3: Area Files, Dundee: Gordon Murray to Lord Hailsham, 17 Jan. 1958.

63 Sloman, Liberal Party and the Economy, 204–29.

64 J. Grimond, The New Liberal Democracy (1958), 17. Emphasis and capitalisation in original.

65 BL CPA CCO 2/5/20: Scottish Intelligence Summary, May 1958. Capitalisation in original.

66 BL CPA CCO 1/12/556/1: Area Files, Argyll: report of meeting, Victoria Hall, Campbeltown, 29 May 1958.

67 NLS Acc. 11368/39: SUA WDC minutes, 6 Nov. 1959; Acc. 10424/27: SUA WDC, Annual Report 1959, 2–3.

68 Harvie, No Gods, 110; Finlay, ‘Unionism and the Dependency Culture’, 111; Mitchell, Scottish Question, 132–3.

69 Finlay, Partnership for Good, 138–9.

70 The Unionist vote in Glasgow totalled 34.4 per cent of the electorate in 1955, and 34.5 per cent in 1959: Craig, F. W. S., British Parliamentary Election Results, 1950–1970 (Chichester, 1971)Google Scholar.

71 Glasgow Herald, 9 Oct. 1959.

72 Liberalism Leads: Liberal Policy (1959).

73 Grimond, J., The Liberal Future (1959), 22Google Scholar.

74 Morgan, K. O., The People's Peace: British History, 1945–1990 (Oxford, 1992), 209–15Google Scholar and 223–8; Ramsden, J., The Winds of Change: From Macmillan to Heath (1996), 158–64Google Scholar.

75 Levitt, I., ‘The Origins of the Scottish Development Department, 1943–62’, Scottish Affairs, 14 (1996), 42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Development and Growth in Central Scotland (Cmnd 2188, 1963), 1.

77 NLS Acc. 11368/90: Sir Alec Douglas-Home: The Unionist Candidate (Perth, 1964).

78 Scotland with the Unionists (Edinburgh, 1964).

79 NLS Acc. 11884/21: Lady Tweedsmuir papers, notes for adoption meeting, 24 Sept. 1964.

80 Liberal intervention also contributed to the loss of Glasgow Woodside at a by-election in November 1962.

81 Scots Independent, Dec. 1946, 4.

82 Aims and Policy of the SNP (Glasgow, 1947; 1962 edn), 3.

83 Scots Independent, 13 Oct. 1956.

84 NLS Acc. 10090/26: McIntyre papers, Scottish National Party: Annual National Conference, 18–19 May 1957, 29–30.

85 Stirling Observer, 1 Dec. 1959.

86 Wilson, G., SNP: The Turbulent Years, 1960–1990 (Stirling, 2009), 56Google Scholar.

87 BL CPA CCO 550/50/1: Surveys of Scottish, Welsh and West Country Nationalism: ‘The Motivations behind Scottish Nationalism’, Mar. 1968.

88 Pentland, G., ‘Edward Heath, the Declaration of Perth and the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, 1966–70’, Twentieth Century British History, 26 (2015), 249–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 NLS Acc. 11368/79: Government of Scotland Policy Group: First Report to the Constitutional Committee, August 1968, 3.

90 NLS Acc. 11368/22: SUA EDC minutes, 10 July 1964.

91 NLS Acc. 11368/5: SUA CC minutes, 11 Nov. 1964.