Article contents
VII. Essay on the Philosophy of the Hindus. Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2009
Extract
In the preceding essay, the Sánc'hya, theistical as well as atheistical, was examined. The. subject of the present essay, will be the dialectic philosophy of Gótama, and atomical of Canáde, respectively called Nyáya “ reasoning, ” and Vaiśéshica “particular.” The first, as its- title implies, is chiefly occupied with the metaphysics of logic; the second with physics: that is, with “particulars” or sensible objects: and hence its name. They may be taken generally, as parts of one system: supplying each other's deficiencies: commonly agreeing upon such points as are treated by both: yet on some differing; and therefore giving origin to two schools, the Naiyáyica, and Vaiśéshica.
- Type
- Papers Read Before the Society
- Information
- Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland , Volume 1 , January 1827 , pp. 92 - 118
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1827
References
page 94 note * C 1. 3.
page 94 noter † Tarc. Bhásh. 1.
page 94 note ‡ Pad. Díp. 1.
page 94 note § Tarc. Bhásh. and N, Sang. 2. 4.
page 95 note * G. 1.
page 97 note * G. 1. 1. 3. 2. and 3. 1. 1—5. Tarc. Bhásh 2. 1.
page 97 note † Pad. Díp. 1. 8.
page 97 note ‡ G. 1.
page 97 note § G. 1. 1. 3. 3.
page 98 note * Tarc. Bhásh. and Com.
page 98 note † G. 3. 1. 6. 1—5.
page 98 note ‡ Can. 4. 2. 1. and Com.
page 98 note § Cap. 3. 16—18 and 5. 99.
page 98 note ‖ Bháshya on Gót.
page 99 note * Pad. Díp. and Mádh. on Céś.
page 99 note † Tarc. Bhásh.
page 99 note ‡ Gót. 1. 1. 3.4—5 and 3. 1. 7 and 8.
page 99 note § Gót. 1. 1. 3. 6.
page 100 note * Gau. on Céś.
page 100 note † Gót. 1. 1. 3. 8. and 3. 2. 6.
page 100 note ‡ Pad. Díp.
page 100 note ‖ Gau. on Céś.
page 100 note § Gót. 1. 3. 5.
page 101 note * Can. 1. 1. 4. 1. Céś. and Com. Pad. Díp.
page 101 note † Can. 2. 1. 1. 1.
page 104 note * Can. 2. 2. 2. 1. Céś. &c.
page 105 note * Céś.
page 105 note † Pad. Díp.
page 106 note * Can. 1. 1. 2. 2. and 1. 1. 4. 2.
page 106 note † One commentator (Mádh.) specifies blue in place of orange; another (Gau.) omits both, reducing the colours to six.
page 109 note * Tarc. Bhásh. and Pad. Díp.
page 109 note † Ibid.
page 109 note ‡ Ibid. and Siddh. Sang.
page 109 note § Ibid. and Gau. &c.
page 111 note * Tarc. Bhásh.
page 113 note * Bos gavæus s. frontalis. As. Res. 8. 487. Linn. Trans.
page 115 note * Gót. 1. 1. 4. 1—3.
page 115 note † Gót. 1. 1. 5. 1—6.
page 115 note ‡ Gót. 1. 1. 6. i, &c.
page 116 note * The followers of the Mímánsá Pad. Díp.
- 1
- Cited by