Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:11:18.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V. Dynamics of the Chromosphere and Transition Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

R. Grant Athay

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the more interesting aspects of the chromosphere-corona transition region is its tendency to exhibit large Doppler shifts. Both the non-thermal velocity component of line widths and the velocity displacement of line positions tend to maximize at temperatures near 105 K. The increase in velocity amplitudes with increasing temperatures below 105 K is readily understood in terms of the increasing sound speed and decreasing densities associated with the outwardly increasing temperature. Why the observed velocity amplitudes should decrease at still higher temperatures is not at all clear, however, and it seems very likely that this phenomenon is indicative of fundamental differences in the dynamics of the upper transition region and corona from those in the lower transition region and chromosphere.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , 1985 , pp. 108 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985

References

Athay, R.G. et al. 1982, Ap. J., 261, 684.Google Scholar
Athay, R.G., Gurman, J.B. and Henze, W. 1983, Ap. J., 269, 706.Google Scholar
Athay, R.G. et al. 1983, Ap. J., 265, 519.Google Scholar
Brueckner, G.E. 1981, Solar Active Regions, ed. Orrall, F.Q., Colo. Univ. Press: Boulder.Google Scholar
Dame, L., Gouttebroze, P. and Malherbe, J.-M. 1984, Astron. and Astrophys,, 130, 331.Google Scholar
Dere, K.P. 1982a, NASA Conference Publ. 2280, 33, ed. Neugebauer, M., NASA: Wash.D.C. Google Scholar
Dere, K.P. 1982b, Solar Phys., 77, 77.Google Scholar
Feldman, U., Cohen, L. and Doschek, G.A. 1982, Ap. J., 255, 325.Google Scholar
Gebbie, K.B. et al. 1981, Ap. J., 251, L115.Google Scholar
Gurman, J.B. et al. 1982, Ap.J., 253, 939.Google Scholar
Gurman, J.B. and Athay, R.G. 1983, Ap. J., 273, 374.Google Scholar
Henze, W. et al. 1984, Solar Phys., 91, 33.Google Scholar
Kingston, A.E. et al. 1982, Solar Phys., 81, 47.Google Scholar
Kneer, F. and von Uexkull, M. 1983, Astron. and Astrophys,, 119,Google Scholar
124. Mein, P. et al. 1982, Astron. and Astrophys,, 111, 136.Google Scholar
Nicholas, K.R. and Kjeldseth-Moe, O. 1981, The Physics of Sunspots, ed. Cram, L.E. and Thomas, J.H., Sacramento Peak Obs: Sunspot.Google Scholar
Nicholas, K.R. et al. 1982, Solar Phys., 81, 253.Google Scholar
Rottman, G.J., Orrall, F.Q. and Klimchuk, J.A. 1981, Ap. J., 247, L135.Google Scholar
Roussel-Dupre, D. and Shine, R.A. 1982, Solar Phys. 77, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, G. et al. 1982, Astron. and Astrophys,, 115, 367.Google Scholar
Zhugzhda, Y.D. and Makarov, V.I. 1982, Solar Phys., 81, 245.Google Scholar