Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:29:33.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defending Borders: States and Nation-States in the ASEAN 5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Abstract

Discontent simmers within social science over states and nation-states as units of analysis. Disputes over what even constitutes a state, whether simply an organizational apparatus, albeit with unique legitimacy, or a broader complex of social relations, have never been resolved. But it is not just its murky delineation with which the state is afflicted. It has lately come under attack from above and below, with causality seen to be draining away to transnational and sub-national forces. This paper begins by rehearsing the economic and social vectors along which assaults on the state and the nation-state are conveyed. It then turns to Southeast Asia, a part of the developing world in which the state would seem especially vulnerable, its powers having been usurped by transnational firms and corroded internally by connected rent-seekers and provincial “men of prowess.” However, this paper tries also to show that in Southeast Asia, national states and territorial borders have remained quite intact. Neither globalized markets, regional formations, local identity construction, administrative decentralization or migration have shaken the standing of the state and the nation-state as appropriate units of analysis. This is especially the case when addressing major questions about regime types and change in the region.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agung, Wicaksono. 2007, July 10. Learning from the success of Temasek, Khazanah. Jakarta Post. Available at: http://www.iseas.edu.sg/viewpoint/aw10july07.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2010).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Jocelyn, Armstrong, Warwick and Mulliner, Kent (eds.) 2001. Chinese Populations in Contemporary Southeast Asian Societies: Identities, Interdependence, and International Influence. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, Mitchell and Ravenhill, John. 1995. Beyond product cycles and flying geese: regionalization, hierarchy, and the industrialization of East Asia. World Politics 47(2), 171209.Google Scholar
Boudreau, Vince. 2004. Resisting Dictatorship: Repression and Protest in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Edith. 1998. From village to camp: refugee camp life in transition on the Thailand-Burma border. Forced Migration Review 2, 1114. Available at: http://ocha-gwapps1.unog.ch/rw/RWFiles2005.nsf/fb9a3459e0c5a152c1257205004f1c3e/c1257243004e0cf2c1257344004ec8f2/$FILE/rsc-mmr-31aug.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2010).Google Scholar
Case, William. 2010. Malaysia. In Dizard, Jake, Walker, Christopher and Cook, Sarah (eds.), Countries at the Crossroads 2010: An Analysis of Democratic Governance, pp. 401420. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen. 2000. The myth of the controllability of difference: labour migration, transnational communities and state strategies in East Asia. Paper presented at “International Conference on Transnational Communities in the Asia-Pacific Region: Comparative Perspectives”, Singapore, 7–8 August 2000.Google Scholar
Channelnewsasia. 2009. Malaysia to unveil new economic stimulus plan. Available at: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific_business/view/413858/1/.html (accessed on 9 March 2009).Google Scholar
Chaiwat, Thanee and Pasuk, Phongpaichit. 2008. Rents and rent-seeking in the Thaksin era. In Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris (eds.), Thai Capital: After the 1997 Crisis, pp. 249–66. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Chin, James. 1994. The Sabah State election of 1994: end of Kadazan unity. Asian Survey 34(10), 904915.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 2003. What to do with the Chiang Mai Initiative. Asian Economic Papers 2(1), 149.Google Scholar
Embong, Abdul Rahman. 2002. State-Led Modernization and the New Middle Class in Malaysia. St Martins: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Terence. 2003. Where have all the capitalists gone?. Aliran Monthly 10. Available at http://aliran.com/archives/monthly/2003a/10h.html (accessed on 25 April 2010).Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hedman, Eva-Lotte E. 2008. Refuge, governmentality and citizenship: capturing ‘illegal migrants’ in Malaysia and Thailand. Government and Opposition 43(2), 358–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin, Richard, Robison and Garry, Rodan (eds.). 1993. Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy and Capitalism. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Higley, John and Burton, Michael G. 1989. The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review 54(1), 1732.Google Scholar
Holliday, Ian. 2009, February 9. Rohingya crisis a part of Myanmar's ethnic strive. South China Morning Post.Google Scholar
Huang, Shirlena and Yeoh, Brenda S.A. 1999. Ties that bind: state policy and migrant female domestic helpers in Singapore. Geoforum 27(4), 479–93.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Iredale, Robyn. 2000. Migration policies for the highly skilled in the Asia-Pacific region. International Migration Review 34(3), 882906.Google Scholar
Jayasankaran, S. 1993. Made-in-Malaysia: the proton project. In Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (ed.), Industrialising Malaysia: Policy, Performance, and Prospects, pp. 272285. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Sydney. 2000. Making Money off Migrants: The Indonesian Exodus to Malaysia. Wollongong: Centre for Asian Pacific Social Transformation Studies.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ethan and Rodrik, Dani. 2002. Did the Malaysian capital controls work. In Edwards, Sebastian and Frankel, Jeffrey A. (eds.), Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets, pp. 393440. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew (ed.). 1994. Business and Government in Industrializing Asia.Google Scholar
Montesano, Michael. 2002. Thailand in 2001: learning to live with Thaksin? Asian Survey 42(1), 101112.Google Scholar
Narine, Shaun. 2008. Forty years of ASEAN: a historical review. Pacific Review 21(4), 411–29.Google Scholar
Natenapha Wailerdsak. 2008. Companies in crisis. In Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris (eds.), Thai Capital: After the 1997 Crisis, pp. 1757. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
NTS Alert. 2010. The many faces of statelessness, February (issue 2). Available at: http://www.rsis.edu.sg/nts/HTML-Newletter/alert/NTS-alert-feb-1002.html (accessed on 28 April 2010).Google Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi. 1994. The Borderless World. London: Profile Business.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (ed.). 1999. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2010. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pries, Ludger. 2001. The approach of transnational social spaces: responding to new configurations of the social and the spatial. In Pries, Ludger (ed.), New Transnational Social Spaces: International Migration and Transnational Companies in the Early Twenty-First Century, pp. 336. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Purcell, Victor. 1951. The Chinese in Southeast Asia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony (ed.). 1996. Sojourners and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Robison, Richard and Goodman, David S. (eds.). 1996. The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonald's and Middle-Class Revolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodan, Garry. 1989. The Political Economy of Singapore's Industrialization: National State and International Capital. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Sandhu, Kernial Singh and A., Mani (eds.). 1993. Indian Communities in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sidel, John. 1999. Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siracusa, Christina and Acacio, Kristel. 2004. State migrant-exporting schemes and their implications for the rise of illicit migration: a comparison of Spain and the Philippines. Journal of International Migration and Integration 5(3), 321342.Google Scholar
Studwell, Joe. 2007. Asian Godfathers: Money and Power in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Suryadinata, Leo (ed.). 1997. Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
The Economist. 1994, December 17. Keen on Debate: Singapore.Google Scholar
Tinker, Hugh. 1990. Indians in Southeast Asia: imperial auxiliaries. In Clarke, Colin, Peach, Ceri, and Vertovec, Steven (eds.), South Asians Overseas: Migration and Ethnicity, pp. 3958. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van de Fliert, J. 2001. GSM in the rural and urban jungles of Indonesia: a case study of an emerging localized socio-technical system. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Twente/Institut Teknologi Bandung.Google Scholar