Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:08:44.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Echo of Christian Antiquity in St. Gregory the Great: Death a Struggle with the Devil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Alfred C. Rush
Alfred C. Rush*
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is not without reason that Harnack calls St. Gregory the Great ‘Doctor angelorum et diaboli.’ The misery of Gregory's times, occasioned by the incessant attacks of the Lombards, made him convinced that the end of the world was at hand. Thus it is that his thought has a definitely eschatological stamp. The terrors of death and the fierce onslaughts of the devil were popular themes with St. Gregory the Great.

Type
Miscellany
Information
Traditio , Volume 3 , 1945 , pp. 369 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © 1945 by Cosmopolitan Science & Art Service Co., Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harnack, A., Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte 3 (Freiburg im Breisgau3 1897) 242.Google Scholar

2 Dudden, F, Gregory the Great, his Place in History and Thought 2 (London 1905) 3–42, 430; Batiffol, P, Saint Gregoire le Grand (Paris 1928) 73. Cf. Vasiliev, A., ‘Medieval Ideas on the End of the World: West and East,’ Byzantion 16 (1942–1943) 462–502.Google Scholar

3 Homilia in Evangelia II, 39, 4 (PL 76, 1296): ‘Qui unquam sunt humanae animae maiores inimici, quam maligni spiritus, qui hanc a corpore exeuntem obsident?’ For a discussion of the relation between death and the devil in patristic thought, cf. Rivière, J. ‘Mort et démon chez les Pères,’ Revue des sciences religieuses 10 (1930) 577–621.Google Scholar

4 Hom. in Evan. II, 39, 8 (PL 76, 1299).Google Scholar

5 Ibid.: ‘Unde curandum nobis est, et cum magnis quotidie fletibus cogitandum, quam rabidus, quam terribilis sua in nobis opera requirens in die exitus nostri princeps huius mundi veniat, si etiam ad Deum carne morientem venit, et in illo aliquid quaesivit in quo invenire nihil potuit.'Google Scholar

6 Ibid. (PL 76, 1298): ‘Nam cogitandum valde est quantum nobis erit terribilis hora nostrae resolutionis, qui pavor mentis, quanta tunc omnium malorum memoria, quae oblivio transactae felicitatis, quae formido et consideratio judicis. Tunc maligni spiritus in egrediente anima sua opera requirunt; tunc mala quae suaserunt replicant, ut sociam ad tormenta trahant. Sed cur hoc de perversa solummodo anima dicimus, cum ad electos quoque egredientes veniant, et suum in illis, si praevaleant, aliquid requirant?'Google Scholar

7 Ibid. 9 (PL 76, 1299–1300): ‘Quid requirenti adversario et multa sua in nobis invenienti dicemus, nisi solum quod nobis est certum refugium, et solida spes, quia unum cum illo facti sumus in quo princeps huius mundi et suum aliquid requisivit, et invenire minime potuit? Constat enim, nec negare possumus, sed veraciter fatemur quia princeps huius mundi habet in nobis multa; sed tamen mortis nostrae tempore iam nos rapere non valet, quia eius membra effecti sumus, in quo non habet quidquam.'Google Scholar

8 Dudden, op. cit. 1, 253–254; Batiffol, P., op. cit. 73–74.Google Scholar

9 Hom. in Evan. II, 39, 10 (PL 76, 1300); Regula Pastoralis III, 6 (PL 77, 56–57). Cf. Wirtz, D., The Influence of the Regula Pastoralis to the Year 900 (Ithaca, N Y 1936).Google Scholar

10 Hom. in Evan. I, 19, 7 (PL 76, 1158–9); Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1292–3); Dialogi IV, 40 (Fonti per la Storia d'Italia 57, 292–293 Moricca) = Dialogi IV, 38 (PL 76, 389, 392).Google Scholar

11 Hom. in Evan. I, 19, 7 (PL 76, 1158).Google Scholar

12 Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1292).Google Scholar

13 Dudden, op. cit. 1, 211–218.Google Scholar

14 Hom. in Evan. I, 19, 7 (PL 76, 1158): ‘At ille subito ad devorandum se draconem venire onspiciens, magnis vocibus coepit clamare, dicens: Ecce draconi ad devorandum datus um, qui propter vestram praesentiam devorare me non potest. Quid mihi moras facitis? ate locum ut ei devorare me liceat.’ Theodore evidently felt certain that he was in-vitably to be devoured by the dragon. To his mind the prayers of the brethren were nly prolonging his agony. Cf. the more drastic description, Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 PL 76, 1293): ‘Caput meum iam in suo ore absorbuit; date locum ut me amplius non cru-iet, sed faciat quod facturus est. Si ad devorandum datus sum, quare propter vos moras atior?'Google Scholar

15 Hom. in Evan. I, 19, 7 (PL 76, 1158): ‘Volo me signare, sed non possum, quia a dracone remor. Spumae oris eius faciem meam liniunt, guttur meum eius ore suffocatur. Ecce b eo brachia mea comprimuntur, qui iam et caput meum in suo ore absorbuit.'Google Scholar

16 Ibid. (PL 76, 1159): ‘Deo gratias; ecce discessit, ecce exiit, ante orationes vestras git draco qui me acceperat.'Google Scholar

17 Ibid.; Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1293); Dialogi IV, 40 (293 Moricca).Google Scholar

18 Dialogi IV, 40 (295 Moricca).Google Scholar

19 Ibid.: ‘Quando me vobiscum credebatis ieiunare, occulte comedebam, et nunc ecce d devorandum draconi sum traditus, qui cauda sua mea genua pedesque conlegavit, aput viro suum intra meum os mittens, spiritum meum ebibens abstrahit.'Google Scholar

20 Hom. in Evan. I, 12, 7 (PL 76, 1122): Dialogi IV, 40 (293–4 Moricca).Google Scholar

21 The ancient pagans and also the Christians usually portrayed the devil as a black demon. Cf. Dölger, F, Die Sonne der Gerechtigkeit und der Schwarze (Liturgiegeschichtliche Forschungen 2, Münster 1919); Rush, A. C., Death and Burial in Christian Antiquity (Studies in Christian Antiquity ed. Quasten, Johannes, 1, Washington 1941) 210–211; Zimmermann, F, ‘Kleine Beiträge zur Religionsgeschichte, 1: Die schwarze Farbe des Teufels,’ Theologie und Glaube 4 (1912) 631–634. Gregory the Great speaks of the devil coming to a child in the form of a Moor: cf. Dialogi IV, 19 (257 Moricca): ‘Mauri homines venerunt, qui me tollere volunt.’ Very often the devil was pictured as an Egyptian or an Ethiopian. Cf. Quasten, J., ‘Die Grabinschrift des Beratius Nikatoras,’ Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 53 (1938) 64 n. 1.Google Scholar

22 Hom. in Evan. I, 12, 7 (PL 76, 1122): ‘Qui ad extremum veniens, eadem hora qua iam de corpore erat exiturus, apertis oculis vidit tetros et nigerrimos spiritus coram se assistere, et vehementer imminere, ut ad inferni claustra se raperent.'Google Scholar

23 Ibid.: ‘Pavore autem tetrae eorum imaginis huc illucque vertebatur in lectulo, iacebat in sinistro latere, aspectum eorum ferre non poterat; vertebatur ad parietem, ibi aderant. Cumque constrictus nimis relaxari se iam posse desperaret, coepit magnis vocibus clamare, dicens: Inducias vel usque mane, inducias vel usque mane.'Google Scholar

24 Dawson, C., Mediaeval Religion (London 1935) 31–32.Google Scholar

25 Achelis, H., Das Christentum in den ersten drei Jahrhunderten 1 (Leipzig 1912) 132; Quasten, ‘Die Grabinschrift des Beratius Nikatoras’ 61–62; Rush, Death and Burial 29–39; Prat, F Stoddard, J., The Theology of St. Paul 2 (London 1927) 408–410; Gruenthaner, M., ‘The Demonology of the Old Testament,’ Catholic Biblical Quarterly 6 (1944) 6–27 Google Scholar

26 Quasten, loc. cit.; ‘A Coptic Counterpart of a Vision in the Acts of Perpetua and Felicitas,’ Byzantion 15 (1940–1941) 5; Dölger, F, ‘Der Kampf mit dem Ägypter in der Perpetua Vision. Das Martyrium als Kampf mit dem Teufel,’ Antike und Christentum 3 (1932) 177–188; Campenhausen, H., Die Idee des Martyriums in der alten Kirche (Göttingen 1936) 156; Rush, op. cit., 30–32.Google Scholar

27 Ignatius, Ad Romanos 5, 3 (Funk-Bihlmeyer, Die Apostolischen Väter [Tübingen 1924] 99): Google Scholar

28 Martyrium Polycarpi 2, 4 (122 Funk-Bihlmeyer).Google Scholar

29 Ibid. 17, 1 (129 Funk-Bihlmeyer): Google Scholar

30 Epistola Ecclesiarum Viennensis et Lugdunensis 1, 5 (Knopf-Krüger, Ausgewählte Märtyrerakten [Tübingen 31929] 18): Google Scholar

31 Epistola 1, 27 (21–22 Knopf-Krüger).Google Scholar

32 Epistola 1, 38 (23 Knopf-Krüger).Google Scholar

33 Epistola 2, 6 (28 Knopf-Krüger): Google Scholar

34 Passio SS. Perpetuae et Felicitatis 10 (Florilegium Patristicum 42, 32–38 van Beek); Owen, E., Some Authentic Acts of the Early Martyrs (Oxford 1927), 84–85. Cf. Dölger, loc. cit. (n. 26).Google Scholar

35 Passio S. Symphorosae 1 (Ruinart, Acta Martyrum [Regensburg 1859] 71).Google Scholar

36 Acta S. Apollonii 47 (35 Knopf-Krüger): Google Scholar

37 Martyrium Fructuosi 7, 2 (85 Knopf-Krüger).Google Scholar

38 Passio SS. Mariani et Jacobi 2, 2 (67–68 Knopf-Krüger): ‘et auidis faucibus ad tentandam fidem rabies diaboli infestantis inhiabat.'Google Scholar

39 Ibid. 2, 5 (68 Knopf-Krüger): ‘sed in illos quoque manum diabolus insatiabilem porrigebat.'Google Scholar

40 Ibid. 5, 1 (69 Knopf-Krüger).Google Scholar

41 Passio SS. Perpetuae et Felicitatis 4, 3–9 (16–20 van Beek).Google Scholar

42 Passio SS. Mariani et Jacobi 6, 7–10 (70 Knopf-Krüger): ‘illic erat catasta, non humili pulpito nec uno tantum ascensibilis gradu, sed multis ordinata gradibus et longe sublimis ascensu. et admouebantur confessorum singulae classes, quas ille iudex ad gladium duci iubebat. uentum est et ad me. tunc exauditur mihi uox clara et immensa dicentis: Marianum applica.’ Cf. Owen, op. cit. 111. For a discussion of the catasta and its relation to the vision of Perpetua's ladder, cf. Quasten, Byzantion 15, 2.Google Scholar

43 Passio S. Bonifatii 13 (330 Ruinart). The rǒle of the angel was to assist the dying, ward off the attacks of the devil, and. then bear the soul to heaven. Cf. Rush, op. cit. 36–43; Nock, A., ‘Postscript,’ Harvard Theological Review 34 (1941) 103–109. For other accounts stressing martyrdom as a struggle with the devil, and the executioners as instruments of the devil, cf. Passio SS. Carpi, Pamfili et Agathonicae 4, 36 (9–10 (Knopf-Krüger): ‘et descendentes festinaverunt ad amphitheatrum venire, ut celerius adimplerent certamen suum turba vero astante ministri diaboli expoliantes primo Pamfilium ligno crucifixerunt.’ Acta S. Maximi 2, 4 (61 Knopf-Krüger): ‘et sic raptus est athleta Christi a ministris diaboli, gratias agens deo et patri per Iesum Christum filium eius, qui eum dignum iudicauit certando diabolum superare.’ Acta S. Julii 4, 5 106 (Knopf-Krüger): ‘minister itaque diaboli percutiens gladio finem imposuit beatissimo martyri.’ Passio SS. Victoris, Alexandri, Feliciani atque Longini 5 (334 Ruinart): ‘Tunc impiissimus Caesar omni fera crudelior, omni dracone malignior, diabolica face succensus in rabiem vertitur.'Google Scholar

44 Tertullian, Scorpiace 6 (CSEL 20, 156 Reifferscheid-Wissowa).Google Scholar

45 Tertullian, Ad Martyres 3 (PL 1, 624).Google Scholar

46 Cyprian, Ad Fortunatum, Praefatio 1 (CSEL 3, 1, 317 Hartel): ‘Desiderasti, Fortunate carissime, ut hortamenta componerem quibus milites Christi ad spiritale et caeleste certamen animarem.’ Cf. Epistula 10, 2 (CSEL 3, 2, 491 Hartel): ‘uidit admirans praesentium multitudo caeleste certamen Dei et spiritale, praelium Christi.’ This letter, addressed to the martyrs and confessors, is centered about the idea of martyrdom as a struggle which Cyprian calls: agon, certamen, praelium, pugna. Google Scholar

47 Ad Fortunatum 13 (1, 346 Hartel): ‘si militibus saecularibus gloriosum est ut hoste deuicto redeant in patriam triumphantes, quanto potior et maior est gloria uicto diabolo ad paradisum triumphantem redire..?'Google Scholar

48 Epistula 39, 2 (2, 582 Hartel). Cf. Epistula 38, 1 (2, 580 Hartel): ‘quotiens aduer-sarius prouocare seruos Dei uoluit, totiens promptissimus ac fortissimus miles et pugnauit et uicit.'Google Scholar

49 Epistula 39, 2 (2, 582 Hartel): ‘ serpens et obtritus et uictus est.’ Speaking of Laurentius and Egnatius, Cyprian says: Epistula 39, 3 (2, 583 Hartel): ‘ sed ueri et spiritales Dei milites dum diabolum Christi confessione prosternunt, palmas Domini et coronas inlustri passione meruerunt.'Google Scholar

50 Epistula 73, 22 (2, 795 Hartel): ‘sciant igitur eiusmodi homines catecuminos illos ad debellandum diabolum de diuinis castris procedere.'Google Scholar

51 Viller, M., ‘Le martyre et l'ascèse,’ Revue d'ascétique et de mystique, 6 (1925) 105–142; Ryan, J., Irish Monasticism (Dublin 1931) 197–198; Quasten, Byzantion 15, 6.Google Scholar

52 Jerome, Epistula 108, 31 (CSEL 55, 349 Hilberg): ‘non solum effusio sanguinis in confessione reputatur, sed deuotae quoque mentis seruitus cotidianum martyrium est.’ Although this concept received greater emphasis after the peace of the Church, it was already developed in the time of persecution. Cf. Cyprian, De opere et eleemosynis 26 (CSEL 3, 1, 394 Hartel); De zelo et livore 16 (CSEL 3, 1, 430–431 Hartel); Epistula 10, 5 (CSEL 3, 2, 495 Hartel).Google Scholar

53 Quasten, Byzantion 15, 6.Google Scholar

54 Athanasius, Vita S. Antonii 65 (PL 26, 933): Google Scholar

55 Quasten, J., ‘Die Grabinschrift’ (n. 21) 63.Google Scholar

56 Ibid. 62–69; Rush, Death and Burial 31–38.Google Scholar

57 Acts of John 114 (James, M. R., The Apocryphal New Testament [Oxford, 1926] 228). Cf. Acts of Thomas 148 (429–430 James); Apocalypse of Paul 14 (531 James); Sahidic Fragments of the Life of the Virgin 105 (Texts and Studies 4, 2, 39 Robinson); Sahidic Fragments of the Death of Joseph 3, 22 (158 Robinson).Google Scholar

58 Origen, Homilia 28 in Lucam (GCS 9, 154–155 Rauer): ‘Cum exierimus e saeculo et haec vita nostra fuerit commutata, erunt quidam in finibus mundi sedentes, velut publicanorum officio diligentissime perscrutantes ne quid sui in nobis reperiant. Videtur mihi princeps saeculi huius quasi publicanus esse, unde scriptum est de eo: venit princeps mundi istius et in me non habet quidquam.'Google Scholar

59 Macarius of Egypt, Homilia 22 (PG 13, 660).Google Scholar

60 Cyril of Alexandria, Homilia 14 de exitu animae (PG 77, 1073): Google Scholar

61 Augustine, Confessiones 9, 13, 36 (Teubner: 208 Skutella).Google Scholar

62 Batiffol, Saint Grégoire le Grand 72; 105–106, 112.Google Scholar

63 Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1293): ‘Gratias Deo, ecce draco qui me ad devorandum acceperat fugit, orationibus vestris expulsus stare non potuit.'Google Scholar

64 Batiffol, op. cit. 72; Bardenhewer, O., Geschichte der altkirchlichen Literatur 5 (Freiburg im Breisgau 1932) 284–285.Google Scholar

65 Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1293); Dialogi IV, 40 (293 Moricca).Google Scholar

66 Rom. in Evan. I, 12, 7 (PL 76, 1122–1123): ‘Nam illi tetros spiritus ante mortem vidisse, et inducias petiisse, quid profuit, qui easdem inducias quas petiit, non accepit?'Google Scholar

67 Dialogi IV, 40 (294 Moricca): ‘De quo nimirum constat, quia pro nobis ista, non pro se viderat, ut eius visio nobis proficiat, quos adhuc divina patientia longanimiter expectat.'Google Scholar

68 Hom. in Evan. I, 12, 7 (PL 76, 1123): ‘Nos ergo, fratres charissimi, nunc sollicite ista cogitemus, ne nobis in vacuum tempora pereant, et tunc quaeramus ad bene agendum vivere, cum iam compellimur de corpore exire.’ Gregory inculcates a similar moral lesson from the story of the monk from Iconium. Cf. Dialogi IV, 40 (295 Moricca): ‘Quod nimirum constat quia ad solam utilitatem audientium viderit, qui eum hostem, cui traditus fuerat, et innotuit et non evasit.'Google Scholar

69 Hom. in Evan. I, 19, 7 (PL 76, 1159).Google Scholar

70 Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 16 (PL 76, 1293).Google Scholar

71 Dialogi IV, 12–18 (243–256 Moricca).Google Scholar

72 Batiffol, op. cit. 150–151.Google Scholar

73 Dudden, Gregory the Great 1, 9–10; Bréhier, L., ‘Saint Grégoire le Grand,’ in Fliche, A. Martin, V, Histoire de l'église 5 (Paris 1938) 18–19.Google Scholar

74 Dialogi IV, 17 (255 Moricca); Hom. in Evan. II, 38, 15 (PL 76, 1291).Google Scholar

75 Dudden, op. cit. 2, 285; Bihlmeyer, K., Kirchengeschichte 1 (Paderborn 10 1936) 299.Google Scholar

76 Dawson, C., Mediaeval Religion 34. Cf. also 1–7.Google Scholar

77 Harnack, A., Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte 3, 241–242; 248–249; Seeberg, R., Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte 3 (Leipzig 3 1923) 34–43; Dudden, op. cit. 2, 285–295.Google Scholar

78 Tixeront, J., History of Dogmas 3 (St. Louis 1916) 305–306.Google Scholar

79 Bardenhewer, Geschichte der altkirchlichen Literatur 5, 284; Manitius, M., Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters 1 (Munich 1911) 97–106; Bréhier, L., in Fliche-Martin, , Histoire de l'église 5, 26–32; Grabmann, M., Die Geschichte der katholischen Theologie seit dem Ausgang der Väterzeit (Freiburg im Breisgau 1933) 22–23, 26; 123. Cf. de Ghellinck, J., Le mouvement théologique du XII siècle (Paris 1914); Wilmart, A., Auteurs spirituels et textes dévots du moyen ǎge (Paris 1932); Grabmann, M., Mittelalterliches Geistesleben, 2 vols. (Munich 1926).Google Scholar

80 Tixeront, History of Dogmas 3, 305; Dudden, Gregory the Great 2, 442–443.Google Scholar