Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2016
Ephraem the Syrian is undoubtedly the best-known holy man of the Syriac-speaking world in the patristic period. Within fifty years of Ephraem's death, Palladius included a notice of him among the ascetic saints whose memory he celebrated in the Lausiac History. Sozomen the historian celebrated Ephraem's memory as a popular ecclesiastical writer, some of whose works had been translated into Greek even during his lifetime. Jerome claimed to recognize Ephraem's theological genius in a Greek translation he read of a book by Ephraem on the Holy Spirit. And toward the end of the fifth century, Gennadius of Marseilles called attention to Ephraem as a composer of metrical psalms. Well within the patristic era itself, therefore, Ephraem's reputation as holy man, theologian, and poet was secure.
1 See Butler, C., The Lausiac History of Palladius (Texts and Studies 6; Cambridge 1898 and 1904) 2.126–27.Google Scholar
2 See Bidez, J. and Hansen, G. H. (edd.), Sozomenus, Kirchengeschichte (GCS 50; Berlin 1960) 127–30.Google Scholar
3 See Richardson, E. C. (ed.), Hieronymus, Liber de Viris Inlustribus (TU 14; Leipzig 1896) 51.Google Scholar
4 Gennadius was actually speaking of one Peter of Edessa, of whom he said that ‘he composed metrical Psalms in the manner of Ephraem the deacon.’ Richardson, E. C. (ed.), Gennadius, Liber de Viris Inlustribus (TU 14; Leipzig 1896) 87.Google Scholar
5 See now Joseph Amar, P., ‘The Syriac Vita Tradition of Ephrem the Syrian’ (Dissertation, The Catholic University of America 1988). A convenient summary in Latin of the traditional lives of St. Ephraem is readily available in ‘De S. Ephrem Syro Edessae in Mesopotamia,’ AS February 1 (Paris 1863) 49–78.Google Scholar
6 In Syriac sources, as will appear below, Ephraem is consistently remembered as ‘the great teacher’ (malpōnǒ rabbǒ).Google Scholar
7 Knowles, David, The Monastic Order in England (2nd ed.; Cambridge 1966) 693.Google Scholar
8 PG 46.824A–B. As Joseph Amar has argued in ‘The Syriac Vita Tradition of Ephrem the Syrian’ (above, n. 5) 21 n. 73, a seventh-century date for the Encomium is suggested by a reference at the end of the work to hostile action in Syria on the part of the ‘Barbarian progeny of Ishmael’ (849A).Google Scholar
9 Classic studies of the pertinent hagiographical literary genre are Delehaye, H., Les Légendes hagiographiques (2nd ed.; Brussels 1906) and Peeters, P., Orient et Byzance: Le tréfonds oriental de l'hagiographie byzantine (Subsidia Hagiographica 26; Brussels 1950). See also Cox, P., Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man (Berkeley 1983).Google Scholar
10 See De Halleux, André, ‘Une clé pour les hymnes d'Éphrem dans le MS Sinai Syr. 10,’ Le Muséon 85 (1972) 171–99; id., ‘La transmission des hymnes d'Éphrem d'après le MS. Sinai Syr. 10. f. 165v–178a,’ Symposium Syriacum 1972 (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 197; Rome 1974), 21–63; Outtier, B., ‘Contribution à l'étude de la préhistoire des collections d'hymnes d'Éphrem,’ Parole de l'Orient 6–7 (1975–76) 49–61.Google Scholar
11 On the Vita Ephraemi and its origins, see now Amar, J. P., ‘The Syriac Vita Tradition of Ephrem the Syrian’ (above n. 5). On the Testament of Ephraem, its inauthenticity, and its debt to the tradition that produced the Vita, see Amar, , and Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV (CSCO 335; Louvain 1973) XI–XIV.Google Scholar
12 See Brock, Sebastian, ‘From Antagonism to Assimilation: Syriac Attitudes to Greek Learning,’ in Garsoïan, N. G. et al. (edd.), East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period (Washington 1982) 17–34.Google Scholar
13 See Draguet, R., Les formes syriaques de la matière de l'Histoire Lausiaque (CSCO 389, 398; Louvain 1978). For Syriac translations of the works of the Cappadocians, beginning already in the fifth century, see Baumstark, Anton, Geschichte der syrischen Literatur (Bonn 1922) 75–82.Google Scholar
14 See Aland, Barbara, ‘Die philoxenianisch–harklenische Übersetzungstradition,’ Le Muséon 94 (1981) 321–83.Google Scholar
15 See Vööbus, Arthur, History of the School of Nisibis (CSCO 266; Louvain 1965) 234–317.Google Scholar
16 For the spread of the ascetical culture in the West, see Rousseau, Philip, Ascetics, Authority, and the Church in the Age of Jerome and Cassian (Oxford 1978). For the East, see Canivet, P., Le Monachisme syrien selon Théodoret de Cyr (Théologie historique 42; Paris 1977).Google Scholar
17 See Draguet, R., ‘L'Histoire Lausiaque — une œuvre écrite dans l'esprit d'Évagre,’ Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 41 (1946) 321–64; 42 (1947) 4–49; id., Les Formes syriaques de la matière de l'Histoire Lausiaque (CSCO 389–390; Louvain 1978); Guillaumont, A., ‘Les versions syriaques de l'œuvre d'Évagre le Pontique et leur rǒle dans la formation du vocabulaire ascétique syriaque,’ in R. Lavenant (ed.), IIIe Symposium Syriacum 1980 (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 221; Rome 1983), 35–41. The works of Evagrius enjoyed a special prestige in the Syriac-speaking world: see Guillaumont, A., Les ‘Kephalaia Gnostica’ d'Évagre le Pontique (Paris 1962) 196–99.Google Scholar
18 See Fiey, J.-M., ‘Aones, Awūn et Awgīn (Eugène), aux origines du monachisme mésopotamien,’ Analecta Bollandiana 80 (1962) 52–81.Google Scholar
19 On this incident in the Vita, see Polotsky, H. J., ‘Ephraems Reise nach Aegypten,’ Orientalia 2 (1933) 269–74. The late fourth-century Egyptian St. Bishoi came to play a special role in the spiritual life of the Syriac-speaking church, through his Vita and the liturgical celebration of the anchorite's accomplishments. In the present connection one should note that in all accounts, Egyptian and Syrian, Ephraem's visit is a dominant feature of the story. See the Vita in P. Bedjan (ed.), Acta Martyrum et Sanctorum Syriace 3 (Paris 1892) 572–620. See also Hambye, E. R., ‘Pishay, anachorète — une commémoraison peu connue du calendrier de l'église syrienne d'Antioche,’ L'Orient syrien 7 (1962) 255–58.Google Scholar
20 See Rousseau, O., ‘La rencontre de saint Ephrem et de saint Basile,’ L'Orient syrien 2 (1957) 261–84; 3 (1958) 73–90.Google Scholar
21 Ephraem's Testament was first published and translated into French by Rubens Duval, ‘Le Testament de saint Éphrem,’ Journal asiatique 9th series, 18 (1901) 234–319. The critical edition, with German translation, is by Beck, Edmund, Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV (CSCO 334–335; Louvain 1973) 334.43–69 (Syriac); 335.53–80 (German). Sabas’ ‘testament’ is a reproach of himself for his sinfulness. The so far unpublished Arabic text is in Vatican Arabic MS 71, fols. 210–14.Google Scholar
22 See Segal, J. B., Edessa, ‘the Blessed City’ (Oxford 1970); Drijvers, H. J. W., ‘Edessa,’ in Theologische Realenzyklopädie 9 (1982) 272–88, esp. 284–88.Google Scholar
23 The Vita presents the ‘story of Mar Ephrem, hermit and master of the Syrians, who was in Edessa in Mesopotamia’: Amar, ‘The Syriac Vita Tradition of Ephrem the Syrian’ (above, n. 5) 1. The writer notes Ephraem's birth in Nisibis, and his association with the saintly bishop Jacob. But the Vita says nothing about Ephraem's ministry in his native city. In fact the Vita reports that Ephraem was baptized only after the surrender of Nisibis to the Persians, and just before his move to Edessa, where his career unfolds. See Amar, 34ff. The Testament celebrates Edessa, Ephraem's home, as ‘the mother of wise men.’ See Beck, , Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV (CSCO 334) 50.234.Google Scholar
24 Beck, Edmund, Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Paradiso und Contra Julianum (CSCO 174–175; Louvain 1957). See also Samuel Lieu, N. C., The Emperor Julian, Panegyric and Polemic (Liverpool 1986) 90–134; Sidney Griffith, H., ‘Ephraem the Syrian's Hymns “Against Julian,” Meditations on History and Imperial Power,’ Vigiliae Christianae 41 (1987) 238–66.Google Scholar
25 On this subject see Sidney Griffith, H., ‘History and the Doctrina Addai,’ forthcoming.Google Scholar
26 See now William Petersen, L., The Diatessaron and Ephrem Syrus as Sources of Romanos the Melodist (CSCO 475; Louvain 1985). See also Brock, S. P., ‘Syriac and Greek Hymnography: Problems of Origins,’ Journal of the Iraqī Academy Syriac Corporation 6 (1981–1982) 1–11; reprinted in Studia Patristica 16 (TU 129; Berlin 1985) 77–81.Google Scholar
27 See n. 2 above.Google Scholar
28 See Geerard, M., Clavis Patrum Graecorum 2 (Turnhout 1974) 366–468. See also Schamp, J., ‘Éphrem de Nisibe et Photios: Pour une chasse aux textes à travers la bibliothèque,’ Le Muséon 98 (1985) 293–314.Google Scholar
29 See the Greek text and Latin translation in Assemani, J. S. (ed.), Ephraem Syri Opera Omnia 1 (Rome 1732) 40–70. Concordances to this text and Syriac texts attributed to Ephraem, with further bibliography, are listed in Geerard, Clavis Patrum Graecorum 2. See also Schamp, , ‘Éphrem de Nisibe et Photios,’ n. 28 above.Google Scholar
30 See Bardy, G., ‘Le souvenir de saint Éphrem dans le haut moyen ǎge latin,’ Revue du moyen ǎge latin 2 (1946) 297–300; Kirchmeyer, J. and Hemmerdinger-Iliadou, D., ‘Saint Ephrem et le “Liber Scintillarum”,’ Recherches de science religieuse 46 (1958) 545–50; Pattie, T. S., ‘Ephraem the Syrian and the Latin Manuscripts of “De Paenitentia”,’ The British Library Journal 13 (1987) 1–24.Google Scholar
31 In Sermon 42, Theodore proposed the ascetical example of St. John Chrysostom and of ‘Ephraem, famous in song’: S. Theodori Studitae Parva Catechesis, in Mai, A., Nova Patrum Bibliotheca 9 (Rome 1888) 102. In his Testament, Theodore confessed his acceptance of the example of the oriental monks, especially Barsanuphius, Anthony, Ephraem and others. See PG 99.1815. Another Studite monk, now anonymous, remarked that the portraits of these same ‘oriental monks’ were to be found in the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople: see ‘De S. Barsanuphio,’ AS April 2 (Paris and Rome 1866) 22.Google Scholar
32 See Sauget, J. M., ‘Le dossier Éphrémien du manuscrit arabe Strasbourg 4226 et de ses membra disiecta,’ Orientalia Christiana Periodica 42 (1976) 426–58; Khalil, Samir, ‘L'Éphrem arabe, état des travaux,’ Symposium Syriacum 1976 (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 205; Rome 1978) 229–40.Google Scholar
33 See Fedotov, G. P., The Russian Religious Mind: Kievan Christianity, the 10th to the 13th Centuries (New York 1960) 158–75; Podskalsky, G., Christentum und theologische Literatur in der kiever Rus’ (988–1237) (Munich 1982) 50, 101–104, 140.Google Scholar
34 Benedict XV, ‘Principi apostolorum Petro,’ Acta Apostolicae Sedis 12 (1920) 457–73.Google Scholar
35 See John Martin, R., ‘The Death of Ephraim in Byzantine and Early Italian Painting,’ The Art Bulletin 33 (1951) 217–25.Google Scholar
36 Guidi, I., Chronica Minora (CSCO 1; Paris 1903) 5.Google Scholar
37 Text in Bedjan, P., Acta Martyrum et Sanctorum Syriace 3 (Paris–Leipzig 1892) 665–79. A new edition of this important text is in preparation by Joseph Amar, P., of the Diocese of St. Maron and the University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
38 Bedjan, , Acta Martyrum 3.667.Google Scholar
39 Ibid. 672.Google Scholar
40 Ibid. 676.Google Scholar
41 Scher, Addai, ‘Mar Barhadbšabba ‘Arbaya: Cause de la fondation des écoles,’ Patrologia Orientalis 4 (1908) 377. On the sense of mpaššqōnǒ as Barḥadbshabbā would have understood it, see Vööbus, A., The Statutes of the School of Nisibis (Stockholm 1961) 73.Google Scholar
42 Scher, , ‘Mar Barhadbšabba,’ 382.Google Scholar
43 Ephraem was probably never an official mpaššqōnǒ at Nisibis or Edessa, although he was an important teacher in the pre-history of these famous schools. See Vööbus, A., History of the School of Nisibis (CSCO 266; Louvain 1965) 7–9.Google Scholar
44 See Beck, E., ‘Philoxenos und Ephräm,’ Oriens Christianus 46 (1962) 61–76.Google Scholar
45 See Brade, Lutz, Untersuchungen zum Scholienbuch des Theodoros bar Konai (Göttinger Orientforschungen 8; Wiesbaden 1975) 78–80, 121; Reinink, G. J., Studien zur Quellen- und Traditionsgeschichte des Evangelienkommentars der Gannat Bussame (CSCO 414; Louvain 1979) 21, 26 et passim. Google Scholar
46 See Leloir, L., S. Ephrem, commentaire de l'évangile concordant, version arménienne (CSCO 137 and 145; Louvain 1953–1954); id., S. Ephrem, commentaire de l'évangile concordant, texte syriaque (Manuscrit Chester Beatty 709) (Dublin 1962); id., L'évangile concordant ou le Diatessaron (Sources chrétiennes 121; Paris 1966). See also the studies cited in n. 26 above.Google Scholar
47 Assemani, J. S., Bibliotheca Orientalis Clementino-Vaticana 3.1 (Rome 1725) 61ff. See the English translation in Badger, G. P., The Nestorians and their Rituals II (London 1852) 328.Google Scholar
48 For the Syriac works attributed to Ephraem that are of questionable authenticity, and for a list of misattributed works, see Melki, J., ‘Saint Éphrem le Syrien, un bilan de l'édition critique,’ Parole de l'Orient 11 (1983) 44–88.Google Scholar
49 Ibid. 42–44.Google Scholar
50 Eventually the documents that present Ephraem in the icon of the holy monk were translated into Armenian. The Syriac Vita appeared in the early 12th century; Ephraem's Testament was translated from Greek in the 11th or 12th century, as was the encomium of Ephraem attributed to Gregory of Nyssa. See Ter-Pétrossian, L. and Outtier, B., Textes arméniens relatifs à s. Ephrem (CSCO 473–474; Louvain 1985).Google Scholar
51 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Paschahymnen (CSCO 248; Louvain 1964) 82–83. See also p. 84, stanzas 8 & 9.Google Scholar
52 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen contra Haereses (CSCO 169; Louvain 1957) 211–12.Google Scholar
53 See n. 10 above.Google Scholar
54 See Gribomont, J., ‘La tradition liturgique des hymnes pascales de S. Éphrem,’ Parole de l'Orient 4 (1973) 191–246.Google Scholar
55 Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Epistle 145 (PG 83.1345D).Google Scholar
56 Bedjan, , Acta Martyrum 3 (above n. 37) 667.Google Scholar
57 Lamy, T. J., Sancti Ephraem Syri Hymni et Sermones (Malines 1882–1902). See Melki, , ‘S. Éphrem, un bilan’ (above, n. 48) 18.Google Scholar
58 See, e.g., Bouvy, E., ‘Les sources historiques de la vie de saint Éphrem,’ Revue Augustinienne 2 (1903) 155–64; Schiwietz, S., Das morgenländische Mönchtum III (Mödling bei Wien 1938) 93–165.Google Scholar
59 For a summary account of Beck's editions between the years 1955 and 1975 see Melki, , ‘S. Éphrem, un bilan’ (above n. 48) 23–41.Google Scholar
60 So Schiwietz, S. could speak of St. Ephraem, the Syrian doctor of the church, ‘as an ascetic in Nisibis and later a monk outside Edessa’: Das morgenländische Mönchtum III 93.Google Scholar
61 See Aphrahat's exposition on the bnay qyōmǒ in Parisot, I., Aphraatis Sapientis Persae Demonstrations (Patrologia Syriaca 1; Paris 1894) 239–312.Google Scholar
62 See Vööbus, A., Literary, Critical and Historical Studies in Ephrem the Syrian (Stockholm 1958).Google Scholar
63 Vööbus, A., History of Asceticism in the Syrian Orient (CSCO 197; Louvain 1960) 89.Google Scholar
64 The titles of the five texts bespeak their themes: the ‘Letter to the Mountaineers,’ the homilies ‘On the Solitude of the Anchorites,’ ‘On Anchorites, Hermits and Mourners,’ ‘On Anchorites, Mourners and Hermits,’ and ‘On the Solitaries, Mourners.’ All of these texts, save the last one, have been edited, together with the Testament, in Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV (CSCO 334; Louvain 1973). For Vööbus’ discussion of them, see Vööbus, A., ‘Beiträge zur kritischen Sichtung der asketischen Schriften, die unter dem Namen Ephraem des Syrers überliefert sind,’ Oriens Christianus 39 (1955) 48–55; id., Literary, Critical and Historical Studies 59–86; id., History of Asceticism (above n. 63) 2–10. See now the studies of G. Edward Mathews, Jr., ‘Isaac of Antioch, “On Solitaries, Mourners and Hermits”: A Translation and Commentary’ (MA Thesis, The Catholic University of America 1987).Google Scholar
65 Vööbus, History of Asceticism (above, n. 63) 93–94.Google Scholar
66 Ibid. 97.Google Scholar
67 See Beck, E., ‘Ein Beitrag zur Terminologie des ältesten syrischen “Monchtums,”’ Studia Anselmiana 38 (1956) 254–67; id., ‘Asketentum und Mönchtum bei Ephraem,’ in Il Monachesimo Orientale (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 153; Rome 1958) 341–62 (French translation in L'Orient syrien 3 [1958] 273–98). In these important articles, Beck was reacting principally not to Vööbus’ studies, but to the provocative article of Alfred Adam, ‘Grundbegriffe des Mönchtums in sprachlicher Sicht,’ Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 65 (1953/54) 209–39. Nevertheless, in these studies Beck developed the views that enabled him definitively to perceive the inauthenticity of the ascetical texts Vööbus took to be genuine works of St. Ephraem. See Beck, E., Sermones IV (above n. 11) v–xi. See also Melki, , ‘S. Éphrem, un bilan’ 72–76, 80–82, 87–88.Google Scholar
68 See nn. 10, 22, 23 above.Google Scholar
69 See Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen auf Abraham Kidunaya und Julianus Saba (CSCO 322–323; Louvain 1972); Melki, , ‘S. Éphrem, un bilan’ 38, 57–60.Google Scholar
70 See Beck, E., ‘Éphrem le Syrien (saint),’ Dictionnaire de spiritualité, 4.788–800; id., ‘Ephraem Syrus,’ Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 5.520–31; Murray, R. P., ‘Ephrem Syrus, St.,’ A Catholic Dictionary of Theology 2.220–23; id., ‘Ephraem Syrus,’ Theologische Realenzyklopädie 9.755–62; De Halleux, A., ‘Saint Éphrem le Syrien,’ Revue théologique de Louvain 14 (1983) 328–55.Google Scholar
71 This observation and the following points in the biography of Ephraem follow the scheme set forth in De Halleux, A., ‘Saint Éphrem le Syrien,’ 330–33.Google Scholar
72 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Virginitate 37.10 (CSCO 223 [Louvain 1962] 135).Google Scholar
73 See Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen contra Haereses 3.3 (CSCO 169 [Louvain 1957] 11).Google Scholar
74 See Ephraem's reflections in his Julian hymns in Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Paradiso und Contra Julianum (CSCO 174; Louvain 1957) 66–91. See also Griffith, Sidney H., ‘Ephraem the Syrian's Hymns “Against Julian”: Meditations on History and Imperial Power,’ Vigiliae Christianae 41 (1987) 238–66.Google Scholar
75 See Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Carmina Nisibena, erster Teil 33.7 (CSCO 218 [Louvain 1961] 79).Google Scholar
76 Guidi, , Chronica Minora (above, n. 36) 5.Google Scholar
77 Butler, , The Lausiac History (above, n. 1) 2.127.Google Scholar
78 See nn. 10 and 22 above. See also Joseph Amar, P., ‘Monastic Influence and (Greek) Cultural Bias in the Vita Tradition of Ephraem the Syrian,’ to appear.Google Scholar
79 On Ephraem's ecclesiology, see Molitor, J., ‘Die kirchlichen Ämter und Stände in der Paulusexegese des hl. Ephräm,’ in Die Kirche und ihre Ämter und Stände: Festgabe Kardinal Frings (Cologne 1960) 379ff.; Ortiz, I. de Urbina, ‘L'évěque et son rǒle d'après saint Ephrém,’ Parole de l'Orient 4 (1973) 137–46; Murray, R., Symbols of Church and Kingdom: A Study in Early Syriac Tradition (Cambridge 1975); Sidney Griffith, H., ‘Ephraem, the Deacon of Edessa, and the Church of the Empire,’ in Halton, T. and Williman, J. P. (edd.), Diakonia: Studies in Honor of Robert T. Meyer (Washington, D.C. 1986) 22–52.Google Scholar
80 Beck, , Carmina Nisibena 21.23 (CSCO 218.59).Google Scholar
81 Ibid. 17.3 (46).Google Scholar
82 Ibid. The use of the word dayrǒ here is instructive. Later it will become the standard Syriac word for ‘monastery.’ Here it applies to a ‘fold’ of ministers, or ‘herdsmen,’ within the shepherd's flock, who assist him in his pastoral ministry.Google Scholar
83 Ibid. 17.4 (46).Google Scholar
84 Beck, , Hymnen contra Haereses 56.10 (CSCO 169.211f.).Google Scholar
85 Ibid. 66.11 (212).Google Scholar
86 See Beck, , Carmina Nisibena 14.1 (CSCO 218.37).Google Scholar
87 Ibid. 21.5 (55f.).Google Scholar
88 Butler, , The Lausiac History (above, n. 1) 2.126.Google Scholar
89 On this subject see Beck, E., Ephräms Trinitätslehre in Bild von Sonne/Feuer, Licht und Wärme (CSCO 425; Louvain 1981), where there are references to Beck's and others’ earlier studies on the Trinity in the works of Ephraem. See also Sidney Griffith, H., ‘The Cappadocian Trinitarian Formula in Syriac,’ forthcoming.Google Scholar
90 See Murray, , Symbols of Church and Kingdom (n. 79, above), and ‘The Theory of Symbolism in St. Ephrem's Theology,’ Parole de l'Orient 6/7 (1975/76) 1–20.Google Scholar
91 See Brown, Peter, Society and the Holy in Late Antiquity (Berkeley 1982), esp. 103–65, and ‘The Saint as Exemplar in Late Antiquity,’ in J. Hawley (ed.), Saint and Virtue (Berkeley 1988) 3–14.Google Scholar
92 Beck, , Carmina Nisibena 15.9 (CSCO 219.41).Google Scholar
93 Ibid. 21.12 (57).Google Scholar
94 Ibid. 17.3 (46).Google Scholar
95 See Parisot, I., Aphraatis Sapientis Persae Demonstrationes (Patrologia Syriaca I; Paris 1894) 239–312. For bibliography see Blum, G. G., ‘Afrahaṭ,’ Theologische Realenzyklopädie 1 (1977) 625–35.Google Scholar
96 Parisot, , Demonstrationes 276. Here and on subsequent pages, e.g., cols. 292–97, Aphrahat exploits the multiple associations of words built on the root q-w-m, one of which, qyōmǒ, is usually translated ‘covenant’ in the present context. On this issue see Connolly, R. H., ‘Aphraates and Monasticism,’ Journal of Theological Studies 6 (1905) 522–39; Murray, R., ‘The Exhortation to Candidates for Ascetical Vows at Baptism in the Ancient Syriac Church,’ New Testament Studies 21 (1974–1975) 59–80; id., ‘The Features of the Earliest Christian Asceticism,’ in P. Brooks (ed.), Christian Spirituality: Essays in Honor of Gordon Rupp (London 1975), 65–77; Nedungatt, G., ‘The Covenanters of the Early Syriac-Speaking Churches,’ Orientalia Christiana Periodica 39 (1973) 191–215, 419–44.Google Scholar
97 See Parisot, , Demonstrationes (above, n. 95) 272–76.Google Scholar
98 Ibid. 276.Google Scholar
99 Ibid. 309; see also 268f.Google Scholar
100 Ibid. 312.Google Scholar
101 Ibid. 269. In the Peshitta, Syriac, īḥǐdōyǒ is the term used in place of the μηνογενοῦς of John 1.14.Google Scholar
102 Ibid. 260.Google Scholar
103 One recalls in this connection the problem of the virgines subintroductae, evident already in the Pseudo-Clementine epistles, ‘Ad virgines,’ which are preserved entire only in Syriac. See the bibliography in Quasten, J., Patrology (Westminster, Md. 1950) 58–59.Google Scholar
104 See Parisot, , Demonstrationes (above, n. 95) 341, 356, 357. For the controversy regarding ‘singleness’ as a requirement even for baptism see the studies cited in n. 96 above, esp. Murray, R., ‘The Exhortation to Candidates for Ascetical Vows’ (n. 96, above).Google Scholar
105 The most important studies of St. Ephraem's ascetic style of life, which a number of authors call ‘premonastic’ or ‘protomonastic,’ are the following: Beck, E., ‘Ein Beitrag zur Terminologie des ältestens syrischen Mönchtums,’ in B. Steidle (ed.), Antonius Magnus Eremita (356–1956) (Studia Anselmiana 38; Rome 1956) 254–67; id., ‘Asketentum und Mönchtum bei Ephraem,’ in Il Monachesimo Orientale (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 153; Rome 1958) 341–62. In these studies, Beck is reacting against ideas suggested by Adam, A., ‘Grundbegriffe des Mönchtums in sprachlicher Sicht,’ Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 65 (1953) 209–39. For Ephraem see also Leloir, L., ‘Saint Éphrem, moine et pasteur,’ in Théologie de la vie monastique (Théologie 49; Paris 1961) 85–97; id., ‘La pensée monastique d'Éphrem et Martyrius,’ in Symposium Syriacum 1972 (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 197; Rome 1974) 105–34. for the larger issues involved in these discussions see Kretschmar, G., ‘Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach dem Ursprung frühchristlicher Askese,’ Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 61 (1964) 27–67; Guillaumont, A., Aux origines du monachisme chrétien (Spiritualité orientale 30; Bégrolles en Mauges 1979).Google Scholar
106 The best book in English on this subject is now Brock, Sebastian, The Luminous Eye: The Spiritual World Vision of St. Ephrem (Rome 1985).Google Scholar
107 Halleux, De, ‘Saint Ephrem le Syrien’ 353.Google Scholar
108 See, e.g., the significance of virginity in Paradise in Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Paradiso und Contra Julianum 7.6,15 (CSCO 174 [Louvain 1957] 26f., 28f.).Google Scholar
109 Beck, , Hymnen de Paradiso 7.18 (CSCO 174.29). This verse has been the subject of some controversy, because some scholars see in it a background for the vision of paradise one finds in the Qur'ān, an idea Dom Edmund Beck summarily rejected. See the comment and bibliography in Lavenant, R., Éphrem de Nisibe, Hymnes sur le Paradis (Sources chrétiennes 137; Paris 1968) 103f. The present writer thinks that such ideas as Ephraem expressed were in fact among those that were ‘in the air’ in the Christian milieu with which Muhammad was familiar.Google Scholar
110 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Ecclesia 28.9 (CSCO 198 [Louvain 1960] 68).Google Scholar
111 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones I 1.356–59 (CSCO 305 [Louvain 1970] 7).Google Scholar
112 Ibid. 9.Google Scholar
113 S. Brock, P., ‘Ephrem's Letter to Publius,’ Le Muséon 89 (1976) 286f. There is an allusion here to Jesus’ parable of the wise and foolish virgins, Mt. 25.1–13.Google Scholar
114 Beck, , Sermones I 2.295–98, 348–52 (CSCO 305.18f.).Google Scholar
115 See Griffith, , ‘Ephraem, the Deacon of Edessa’ (above, n. 79).Google Scholar
116 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de Fide (CSCO 154 [Louvain 1955] 7).Google Scholar
117 Beck, , Hymnen de Virginitate 21.2 (CSCO 223.71).Google Scholar
118 On the significance of the term abǐlǒ for Ephraem and later writers, see the articles by Beck, E. cited in n. 105 above.Google Scholar
119 See n. 64 above.Google Scholar
120 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen auf Abraham Kidunaya und Julianus Saba 2.13 (CSCO 322 [Louvain 1972] 41).Google Scholar
121 On the double significance of the title ‘single one’ to mean both ‘celibate’ and ‘only-begotten’ see above, and n. 101. The present writer will have more to say on this issue in the forthcoming paper, ‘ “Singles” in God's Service: Celibacy in Early Syrian Asceticism,’ Society for Biblical Literature Annual Meeting; Chicago 1988. Google Scholar
122 Beck, E., Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV 2.509–32 (CSCO 334 [Louvain 1973] 27f.).Google Scholar