Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:35:44.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whatever: making sense of John Carey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

D.J. Sheppard
Get access

Abstract

D.J. Sheppard reflects on Carey's controversial What Good are the Arts?

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 6 , Issue 17-18 , Spring 2008 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Carey, John, What Good are the Arts? (London: Faber and Faber, 2005). All pages references are to the paperback edition (London: Faber and Faber, 2005).Google Scholar

2 Carey attributes this phrase to Sam Leith in the Daily Telegraph (p. 269), but it is a point also made by Jonathan Keates in the Times Literary Supplement.Google Scholar

3 For details on the ‘antinomy of taste’, the reader is referred to Kant's Critique of Judgement (1790).Google Scholar

4 Donne, John, Satire III, 80–1.Google Scholar