Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T18:29:09.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REPLY TO PETER LYTH ON WHETHER AN INFINITE TEMPORAL REGRESS OF EVENTS IS POSSIBLE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Andrew Ter Ern Loke
Get access

Abstract

Peter Lyth claimed that my argument against an infinite temporal regress of events conflates number as an abstract entity with number as a number of events or things. I show that my argument does not depend on such a conflation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 16 , Issue 45 , Spring 2017 , pp. 77 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Loke, Andrew, ‘Is an Infinite Temporal Regress of Events Possible?’, Think 11 (2012), 105–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Lyth, Peter, ‘A Response to Loke's “Is an Infinite Temporal Regress of Events Possible?”’, Think 13 (2014), 85–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.