Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:09:40.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should philosophers be consistent? (Part One)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Berel Dov Lerner
Get access

Abstract

Berel Dov Lerner argues for inconsistency.

‘Consistency is a virtue for trains: what we want from a philosopher is insights, whether he comes by them consistently or not.’

Stephen Vizinczey.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 6 , Issue 17-18 , Spring 2008 , pp. 201 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)