Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T00:36:49.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Tracy C. Davis  and
Brace McConnachie
Tracy C. Davis
Affiliation:
Teaches in the Departments of Theatre, English, and Performance Studies at Northwestern University, where she is also Director of the Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Theatre and Drama.
Brace McConnachie
Affiliation:
Director of Graduate Studies in Theatre Arts at the University of Pittsburgh. He has written widely on theatre historiography and audiences.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite the etymological origins of “spectator” in looking and “audience” in hearing, the multiple activities involved in attending an event (whether formally in the theatre or in other reminiscent circumstances) involve the senses more than one at a time, and indeed they involve more than the senses. Some of the most compelling spectacles of the modern era, such as homelessness, seem to repel looking and hearing for too many who encounter them on the streets, and only hold the attention of a few when dramatized by Gorky in The Lower Depths.

Type
Introduction
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , November 1998 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1. Bartsch, Shadi, Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Pedicord, Harry, The Theatrical Public in The Time of Garrick (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1954)Google Scholar; Cook, Ann Jennalie, The Privileged Playgoers of Shakespeare's London, 1576–1642 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; and Henneke, Ben, “The Playgoer in American (1752–1952),” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, 1956.Google Scholar

3. Gurr, Andrew, Playgoing in Shakespeare's London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar Cambridge published Gurr's book in paperback in 1988, after which it enjoyed three reprintings until 1994, when the second edition appeared. Gurr included new evidence in the second edition, but his empirical point of view and methodologies remain unchanged.

4. Bennett, Susan, Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception (London: Rout-ledge, 1990).Google Scholar A second revised edition followed in 1997.

5. Kift, Dagmar, The Victorian Music Hall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

6. Wiles, David, Tragedy in Athens: Space and Theatrical Meaning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnson, James H., Listening in Paris: A Cultural History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Hartman, Saidiya, Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery and Self-making in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Fearnow, Mark, The American Stage and the Great Depression: A Cultural History of the Grotesque (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Balme, Chris, “Between Separation and Integration: Intercultural Studies in Contemporary Maori Theatre,” in The Intercultural Performance Reader, ed. Pavis, Patrice (London: Routledge, 1996), 179–187.Google Scholar

7. Crary, Jonathan, “Modernizing Vision,” in Williams, Linda, ed., Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994) 23–35Google Scholar; McQuail, Denis, Audience Analysis (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1997).Google Scholar