Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:31:45.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theatre and the Publics of Democracy: Between Melodrama and Rational Realism1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2016

PARTHA CHATTERJEE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theatre that developed in late nineteenth-century India, especially in the Bengal and Maharashtra regions, catered to an audience that was much wider than the new educated middle-class males who introduced the European stage form in Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune. Driven by private capital, the new Indian theatre adopted the melodrama as its main dramatic form. When performance capital shifted to the more lucrative field of cinema in the middle of the twentieth century, the melodramatic form again became the chief narrative mode. Such is its power that it has become the principal rhetorical form of popular democracy in India. In the decades after independence, theatre was rescued from imminent death by the support provided by state agencies which sponsored the production of a national theatre canon and style, as opposed to the prevailing regional ones. However, with bureaucratization and political interference, theatre in India today must revert to its one inherent superiority over the cinema – the immediacy of its encounter with small audiences.

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Research International , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , October 2016 , pp. 202 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Keynote address at the conference of the International Federation for Theatre Research held in Hyderabad in July 2015. I am grateful to Trina Banerjee, Rustom Bharucha, Rimli Bhattacharya, Sudipto Chatterjee, Shayoni Mitra, Debashree Mukherjee, Suman Mukhopahyay, Janelle Reinelt and other conference participants for their comments.

References

NOTES

2 Mitra, Amal, Kalkatay bidesi rangalay (Kolkata: Prakash Bhaban, 1967), pp. 196–212 Google Scholar.

3 Kosambi, Meera, Gender, Culture, and Performance: Marathi Theatre and Cinema before Independence (New Delhi: Routledge, 2014), pp. 265–90Google Scholar.

4 I argue this point at greater length in my forthcoming book Critique of the Nation Form.

5 Kosambi, Gender, Culture, and Performance, pp. 170, 15.

6 The famous patriotic song ‘Vande mataram’ which first appeared in the novel in 1882 refers to seven crore (seventy million) children of the mother nation. That was the population of Bengal in the 1881 census.

7 Ramaswamy, Sumathi, The Goddess and the Nation: Mapping Mother India (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

8 Ramaswamy, Sumathi, Passions of the Tongue: Language Devotion in Tamil India 1891–1970 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Malhotra, Anshu, Gender, Caste and Religious Identities: Restructuring Class in Colonial Punjab (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

10 Mir, Farina, The Social Space of Language: Vernacular Culture in British Colonial Punjab (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

11 Singh, Ksh. Imokanta, ‘Jester and Gender in Manipuri Theatre Tradition during the Colonial Era (1891–1947) Manipur’, in Singh, Lata, ed., Theatre in Colonial India: Play-House of Power (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 215–40.Google Scholar

12 Most explicitly in Vasudevan, Ravi, The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema (Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2010)Google Scholar.

13 Dutt, Utpal, Girish Chandra Ghosh (New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 1992)Google Scholar; Dalmia, Vasudha, The Nationalization of Hindu Traditions: Bharatendu Harischandra and Nineteenth Century Banaras (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

14 Mukhopadhyay, Apareschandra, Rangalaye tris batsar, ed. Majumdar, Swapan (Kolkata: Granthan, 1972;Google Scholar first published 1933), p. 95.

15 Kosambi, Gender, Culture, and Performance, p. 88.

16 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983)Google Scholar.

17 Dalmia, Vasudha, Poetics, Plays, and Performances: The Politics of Modern Indian Theatre (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 173 Google Scholar.

18 Mee, Erin B., Theatre of Roots: Redirecting the Modern Indian Stage (Kolkata: Seagull, 2007); Suresh Awasthi, ‘“Theatre of Roots” Encounter with Tradition’, The Drama Review, 33, 4 (1989), pp. 48–69.Google Scholar

19 For a critical survey see Dalmia, Poetics, Plays, and Performances, pp. 153–277.

20 Interview with Nissim Ezekiel, 17 January 1971, cited in Dalmia, Poetics, Plays, and Performances, p. 221 n. 41.

21 Cited in Dalmia, Poetics, Plays, and Performances, p. 255.

22 Ibid., p. 191.

23 Cited in ibid., p. 177.

24 For an analysis see Laclau, Ernesto, On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005)Google Scholar.

25 Fo, Dario, The Tricks of the Trade, tr. Joe Farrell (London: Methuen, 1991), p. 115.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., p. 120.