Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:49:49.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segmentation of Drama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

W. M. H. Hummelen
W. M. H. Hummelen
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The semiotics of drama has proved incapable of formulating a theory of segmentation that can be used in practice. Tadeusz Kowzan admits that his suggestion, ‘l'unité sémiologique du spectacle est une tranche contenant tous les signes émis simultanément, tranche dont la durée est égale au signe qui dure le moins’ (1975, 215), leads to a multitude of small, totally unrelated segments. As Erika Fischer-Lichte pointed out (1983, 186–7), it is impossible to tell in advance whether any distinguishable sign system (or combination of sign systems) will manifest itself at all times in the performance. Her conclusion was therefore that semiotics should stop searching for homogeneous units. However, she added, anyone who for practical reasons seeks a division should proceed from the two categories of character and space without which no theatrical process is possible and which can never be consumed into one another. This will not create homogeneous units either, but together these two categories comprise everything to which the various types of theatrical signs may refer.

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Research International , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989 , pp. 41 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckerman, Bernard, Dynamics of Drama. Theory and Method of Analysis, New York 1970.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard, ‘Theatrical Perception’. In: Theatre Research International 4 (1979), p. 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Semiotik des theaters. Band I. Das System der theatralischen Zeichen. Tübingen 1983.Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Das literarische Kunstwerk. Dritte Auflage. Tübingen 1965.Google Scholar
Jansen, Steen, ‘Esquisse d'une théorie de la forme dramatique’. In: Langages 12 (1986), p. 71–93.Google Scholar
Jansen, Steen, ‘Qu'est ce qu'une situation dramatique. Etude sur les notions élémentaires d'une description de textes dramatiques’. In: Orbis Litterarum 28 (1973), p. 235–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowzan, Tadeusz, Littérature el spectacle. La Haye-Paris 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souriau, Emile, Les deux cent mille situations dramatiques. Paris 1950.Google Scholar
Übersfeld, Anne, Lire le Théâtre. 4th edition. Paris 1984.Google Scholar