Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T06:20:04.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Directions in the Paleoecology of Paleozoic Brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Lindsey R. Leighton
Lindsey R. Leighton*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Get access

Extract

Because of their great abundance, widespread distribution, excellent preservation potential (Foote and Sepkoski, 1999), and a tendency not to disarticulate after death, brachiopods are ideal subjects for paleoecological research involving morphometrics, population analysis, and phylogenetics. Paleoecology is a subdiscipline that demands large data sets and statistical tests, and brachiopods provide the opportunity to create such databases. I fully expect to see brachiopods play a major role in the coming years in studies on the cutting edge of paleoecology. My approach in this chapter is to provide some background and tools that hopefully will inspire many new ideas for using brachiopods in the study of paleoecology. My intent is not to convince anyone of the correctness of my ideas, but rather to encourage future research in these directions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 7: Brachiopods Ancient and Modern: A Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper , November 2001 , pp. 185 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. R. 1976. Intraspecific variability in rhynchonellid brachiopods: test of a competition hypothesis. Lethaia, 9:235–244.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1981. Predation scars preserved in Chesterian brachiopods: Probable culprits and evolutionary consequences for the articulates. Journal of Paleontology, 55:192–203.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1986a. Frequency of sublethal shell breakage in articulate brachiopod assemblages through geologic time, p. 159–166. In Racheboeuf, P. R. and Emig, C. C. (eds.), Les Brachiopods Fossils et Actuels, First International Brachiopod Congress. Biostratigraphie du Paleozoique 4.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1986b. Resistance to and repair of shell breakage induced by durophages in Late Ordovician brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology, 60:273–285.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1989. Influence of valve geometry, ornamentation, and microstructure on fractures in Late Ordovician brachiopods. Lethaia, 22:133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1990a. Disarticulated shells of Late Ordovician brachiopods: Inferences in strength of hinge and valve architecture. Journal of Paleontology, 64:524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1990b. Mechanical strength of selected extant articulate brachiopods: Implications for Paleozoic morphologic trends. Historical Biology, 3:169–188.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1999. Functional morphology of external characteristics of articulate brachiopods, p. 371–398. In Savazzi, E. (ed.), Functional Morphology of the Invertebrate Skeleton. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 2001. Functional morphology and biomechanics of articulate brachiopod shells, p. 147–171. In Carlson, S. J. and Sandy, M. R. (eds.), Brachiopods Ancient and Modern: A Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Paleontological Society Paper 7.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. C. 1992. Naticid gastropod predation on corbulid bivalves: effects of physical factors, morphological features, and statistical artifacts. Palaois, 7:602–620.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1980. A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54:273–288.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Gurrola, R. A. 1979. Two boring organisms in a Lower Mississippian community of southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 53:335–344.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W., and Baumiller, T. K. 1994. Demise of the middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna: a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover? Paleobiology, 20(3):345–361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W., and Lane, N. G. 1979 Fossil communities of the Borden (Mississippian) delta in Indiana and northern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1182–1196.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology, 19:372–397.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1990. Non-predatory drilling of Mississippian crinoids by platyceratid gastropods. Palaeontology, 33:743–748.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993. Boreholes in Devonian blastoids and their implications for boring by platyceratids. Lethaia, 26:41–47.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Leighton, L. R., and Thompson, D. L. 1999. Boreholes in Mississippian brachiopods and their implications for Paleozoic gastropod drilling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 147:283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1987 Class Stenolaemata, p. 509–530. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell, Boston, Oxford, London.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Boucot, A. J., and Jones, B. 1993. Absolute depths of Silurian benthic assemblages. Lethaia, 26:25–40.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1981. Concepts in ichnotaxonomy illustrated by small round holes in shells. Acta Geologica Hispanica, 16:55–64.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1966. Predation and shell damage in a Visean brachiopod fauna. Palaeontology, 9:355–359.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. 1974. Density-dependent selection and character displacement. American Naturalist, 108:45–48.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. J. 1989. The articulate brachiopod hinge mechanism: morphological and functional variation. Paleobiology, 15:364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. J. 1992. Evolutionary trends in the articulate brachiopod hinge mechanism. Paleobiology, 18:344–366.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1968 Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. USGS Professional Paper 593-B.Google Scholar
Chesson, P., and Huntley, N. 1997. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. American Naturalist, 150:519–533.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. 1996. Lower Paleozoic brachiopod communities, p. 69–71. In Copper, P. and Jin, J. (eds.), Brachiopods, Proceedings of the Third International Brachiopod Congress. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos, 35:131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, H., Powell, E. N., Newton, H. J., Stanton, R. J., and Staff, G. 1986. Assessing transportation by the covariance of species with comments on contagious and random distributions. Lethaia, 19:1–22.Google Scholar
Denny, M. W. 1991. Biology, natural selection and the prediction of maximal wave-induced forces. South African Journal of Marine Sciences, 10:353–363.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities, p. 342–444. In Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dolmer, P. 1998. The interactions between bed structure of Mytilus edulis L. and the predator Asterias rubens L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 228:137–150.Google Scholar
Durrett, R., and Levin, S. A. 1994. Stochastic spatial models: A user's guide to ecological applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 343:329–350.Google Scholar
Elliot, D. K., and Bounds, S. D. 1987. Causes of damage to brachiopods from the Middle Pennsylvanian Naco Formation, central Arizona. Lethaia, 20:327–355.Google Scholar
Elner, R. W., and Hughes, R. N. 1978. Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenus Hermann. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47:103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel, T. 1975. Character displacement and coexistence in mud snails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia, 20:19–32.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature, 398:415–417.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L., and Bennington, J. B. 1994. Estimating numbers of whole individuals from collections of body parts: a taphonomic limitation of the paleontological record. Paleobiology, 20:245–258.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 2000. Beyond competition. Paleobiology, 26:1–6.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1972. The lophophore and feeding mechanism of the Productidina, Brachiopoda. Journal of Paleontology, 46:213–248.Google Scholar
Hermoyian, C. S., Leighton, L. R., and Kaplan, P. 2001. Limiting similarity and Hutchinsonian ratios in the fossil record. Geology, in press.Google Scholar
Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 12:197–229.Google Scholar
Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological Diversity, The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1971. Evolution of the brachopod hnge, p. 33–46. In Dutro, J. T. (ed.), Paleozoic Perspectives: A Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 3.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. G. 1972. Conceptual models of benthic marine communities, p. 148–159. In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kaplan, P., and Baumiller, T. K. 2000. Taphonomic inferences on boring habit in the Richmondian Onniella meeki epibole. Palaios, 15:499–510.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Bosence, D. W. J. 1991. Taphonomy and time-averaging of marine shelly faunas, p. 115–209. In Allison, P. A. and Briggs, D. E. G. (eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., Boggs, C. H., Kitchell, J. F., and Rice, J. A. 1981. Prey selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record. Paleobiology, 7:533–552.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Dulai, A., and Fürsich, F. T. 1998. A fossil record full of holes: The Phanerozoic history of drilling predation. Geology, 26:1091–1094.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Simões, M. G., Torello, F. F., Mello, L. H. C., and Ghilardi, R. P. 2000. Drill holes in shells of Permian benthic invertebrates. Journal of Paleontology, 74:532–543.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1981. Water flow patterns in and around three species of articulate brachiopods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 55:185–206.Google Scholar
Lavering, I. H. 1993. Gradational benthic marine communities in the Early Carboniferous Rhipidomella fortimuscula Zone (late Visean), New South Wales. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 14:361–370.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 1998. Constraining functional hypotheses: controls on the morphology of the concavo-convex brachiopod Rafinesquina . Lethaia, 31:293–307.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 1999. Antipredatory function of brachiopod ornament. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 31:A–43.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 2000. Environmental distribution of spinose brachiopods from the Devonian of New York: Test of the soft-substrate hypothesis. Palaios, 15:184–193.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 2001. New example of Devonian predatory boreholes and the influence of brachiopod spines on predator success. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 165:53–69.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R., and Savarese, M. 1996. Functional and taphonomic implications of strophomenid brachiopod valve morphology, p. 161–168. In Copper, P. and Jin, J. (eds.), Brachiopods, Proceedings of the 3rd International Brachiopod Congress. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R., and Schneider, C. L. 2001. Neighbor proximity analysis, anew technique for analyzing biotic interactions in the fossil record. Geological Society of America, North-Central Section, Abstracts with Programs, 33(4):A-8.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H., and Levins, R. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist, 101:377–385.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M., and Heckel, P. H. 1998. Paleoecology and taphonomy of faunal assemblages in gray “core” (offshore) shales midcontinent Pennsylvanian cyclothems. Palaios, 13:311–334.Google Scholar
May, R. M., and MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 69:1109–1113.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R. 2000. The optimum biconvex brachiopod in the theoretical spectrum of shell form, p. 415–420. In Savazzi, E. (ed.), Functional Morphology of the Invertebrate Skeleton. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R., and Sutton, R. G. 1981. Late Devonian marine ecology and zoogeography of the central Appalachians and New York. Lethaia, 14:27–43.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. L., and Wolf, L. L. 1970. Dominance and the niche in ecological systems. Science, 167:131–139.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. Counting fossils in a Cincinnatian storm bed: spatial resolution in the fossil record, p. 57–72. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., and Miles, R. S. 1971. Palaeozoic Fishes. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Mudge, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1962. Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Uppermost Pennsylvanian and Lowermost Permian Rocks in Kansas. USGS Professional Paper 323, US Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 81:1–447.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. 1999. Taking advantage of time-averaging. Paleobiology, 25:226–238.Google Scholar
Pacala, S., and Tilman, D. 1994. Limiting similarity in mechanistic and spatial models of plant competition in heterogeneous environments. American Naturalist, 143:222–257.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1974. Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia, 15:93–120.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1999. Biofacies replacement in a sequence stratigraphic framework: Middle and Upper Ordovician of the Nashville Dome, Tennessee, USA. Palaios, 14:301–323.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Bork, K. B. 1998. Secondary tiering on crinoids from the Waldron Shale (Silurian: Wenlockian) of Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 72:887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianka, E. R. 1980. Guild structure in desert lizards. Oikos, 35:194–201.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. C., and Thompson, R. J. 1993. Comparative physiology of suspension feeding in living articulate brachiopods and bivalves: evolutionary implications. Paleobiology, 19:322–334.Google Scholar
Richards, R. P., and Shabica, C. W. 1969. Cylindrical living burrows in Ordovician dalmanellid brachiopod beds. Journal of Paleontology, 43:838–841.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, S. M., and Alexander, R. R. 1996. Hydrodynamic stability of empty shells of extant terebratulids and rhynchonellids: Implications for life habit of extinct biconvex taxa, p. 221–226. In Copper, P. and Jin, J. (eds.), Brachiopods, Proceedings of the 3rd International Brachiopod Congress. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R. 1974. Spatial dispersion of an estuarine benthic faunal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 15:69–80.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1962. Filter-feeding mechanisms in some brachiopods from New Zealand. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 44:592–615.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and Fossil Brachiopods. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1984. Size differences among sympatric, bird-eating hawks: a world-wide survey, p. 254–281. In Strong, D. R., Simberloff, D. S., Abele, L. G., and Thistle, A. B. (eds.), Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1981. Late Paleozoic crustacean communities. Journal of Paleontology, 55:126–137.Google Scholar
Seed, R., and Hughes, R. N. 1995. Criteria for prey size-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 193:177–195.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M., and Lesperance, P. J. 1978. Effect of predation on population dynamics of a Devonian brachiopod. Journal of Paleontology, 52:812–817.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Brett, C. E. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology, 10:229–245.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A., Thayer, C. W., and Brett, C. E. 1985. Predation in the Paleozoic: gastropod-like drillholes in Devonian brachiopods. Science, 230:1033–1037.Google Scholar
Springer, D. A., and Bambach, R. K. 1985. Gradient versus cluster analysis of fossil assemblages: a comparison from the Ordovician of southwestern Virginia. Lethaia, 18:181–198.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. 1971. Distribution and diversity of Pennsylvanian marine faunas relative to water depth and distance from shore. Lethaia, 4:403–412.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of marine benthos, p. 479–625. In Tevesz, M. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Topics in Geobiology 3. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Van Alstine, J. E., Howard, B., Knapczyk, F., and Leighton, L. R. 2000. Reexamining the Richmondian Invasion through a point counting and biovolume approach. Geological Society of America, North Central Section, Abstracts with Programs, 32(4):A-65.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1984. A resetting of Phanerozoic community evolution. Nature, 307:50–52.Google Scholar
Velbel, M. A., and Brandt, D. S. 1989. Differential preservation of brachiopod valves: Taphonomic bias in Platystrophia ponderosa . Palaios, 4:193–195.Google Scholar
Walker, K. R., and Bambach, R. K. 1971. The significance of fossil assemblages from fine-grained sediments: time-averaged communities. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 3:783–784.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 1996. Skeletal composition of Silurian benthic marine faunas. Palaios, 11:550–558.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 2000. Silurian reef-dwelling brachiopods and their ecological implications. Palaios, 15:112–119.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D., Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., Waters, J. A., and Horowitz, A. 1998. Frasnian-Famennian extinction was a non-event for crinoids, blastoids, and bryozoans. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 30:A–30.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., and Hall, D. J. 1974. Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology, 55:1042–1052.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M., and Bambach, R. K. 1968. The composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities. Lethaia, 1:1–27.Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., Stachowitsch, M., Pervesler, P., and Kollmann, H. 1999. Structural features and taphonomic pathways of a high-biomass epifauna in the northern Gulf of Trieste, Adriatic Sea. Lethaia, 32:299–320.Google Scholar