Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T23:19:09.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a general method for estimating the unbalanced magnetic pull in mixed eccentricities motion including sufficiently large eccentricities in a hydropower generator and their validation against EM simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

Yogeshwarsing Calleecharan ,
Ricardo Jauregui  and
Jan-Olov Aidanpää
Yogeshwarsing Calleecharan*
Affiliation:
Division of Mechanics of Solid Materials, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå Tekniska Universitet, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Ricardo Jauregui
Affiliation:
Grup de Compatibilitat Electromagnètica (GCEM), DEE Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Jan-Olov Aidanpää
Affiliation:
Division of Mechanics of Solid Materials, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå Tekniska Universitet, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
*
a e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electromagnetic (EM) analysis of hydropower generators is common practice but rotor whirling is little studied. This paper suggests a novel semi-analytical method for estimating the steady state unbalanced magnetic pull (UMP) when the rotor centre is undergoing mixed eccentricities motion. The ability to estimate the UMP for mixed eccentricities motion in finite element method (FEM)-based modelling software packages is rare. The proposed methodology in its formulation takes advantage of the fact that a purely dynamic eccentricity motion including non-synchronous whirling and a purely static eccentricity motion can be more amenable to implement in existing FEM-based EM modelling software products for UMP estimation. After these initial separate UMP results are obtained, the proposed method can be applied for virtually any mixed eccentricities motion cases up to sufficiently large eccentricities for quick analysis instead of running the mixed eccentricities simulations directly in a FEM-based software package. Good agreement between the UMP from the actual EM mixed eccentricities motion simulations in a commercial FEM-based software package and the UMP estimations by the novel method is made for a wide range of eccentricities that may commonly occur in practice. A modified feature selective validation (FSV) method, the FSV-UPC, is applied to assess the similarities and the differences in the UMP computations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The European Physical Journal - Applied Physics , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , August 2013 , 20901
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Walker, M., in Specification and Design of Dynamo-Electric Machinery (Longmans’ Electrical Engineering Series, 1915)Google Scholar
Rosenberg, E., Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 37, 1425 (1918)CrossRef
Ozelgin, I., International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering & Development 4, 162 (2008)
de Canha, D., Cronje, W.A., Meyer, A.S., Hoffe, S.J., Methods for diagnosing static eccentricity in a synchronous 2 pole generator, in Power Tech, IEEE, Lausanne, 2007, pp. 2162–2167Google Scholar
Tabatabaei, I., Faiz, J., Lesani, H., Nabavi-Razavi, M.T., Transactions on Magnetics 40, 1550 (2004)CrossRef
Joksimovic, G., Bruzzese, C., Santini, E., Static eccentricity detection in synchronous generators by field current and stator Voltage Signature Analysis – Part I: Theory in Electrical Machines (ICEM), XIX International Conference, Rome, Italy, 2010 , pp. 1–6Google Scholar
Iamamura, B.A.T., Le Menach, Y., Tounzi, A., Sadowski, N., Guillot, E., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 46, 3516 (2010)CrossRef
Faiz, J., Babaei, M., Nazarzadeh, J., Ebrahimi, B.M., Amini, S., Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 20, 263 (2010)CrossRef
Faiz, J., Ebrahimi, B.M., Valavi, M., Toliyat, H.A., Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 11, 155 (2009)CrossRef
Negrea, M., Jover, P., Arkkio, A., Electromagnetic flux-based condition monitoring for electrical machines in Fifth International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives, SDEMPED, IEEE, 2005, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
Shakibaei, B.H., World Applied Sciences Journal 17, 1675 (2012)
Wu, L., Lu, B., Huang, X., Habetler, T.G., Harley, R.G., Improved online condition monitoring using static eccentricity-induced negative sequence current information in induction machines, in Industrial Electronics Society, IECON, 31st Annual Conference of IEEE, 2005, pp. 6–10Google Scholar
Holopainen, T.P., Tenhunen, A., Lantto, E., Arkkio, A., Electrical Engineering 88, 25 (2005)CrossRef
Holopainen, T.P., Tenhunen, A., Lantto, E., Arkkio, A., Electrical Engineering 88, 13 (2005)CrossRef
Lundström, N.L.P., Aidanpää, J.-O., International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 43, 933 (2008)CrossRef
Binns, K.J., Dye, M., Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 120, 349 (1973)CrossRef
Bradford, M., Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 115, 1619 (1968)CrossRef
Ohishi, H., Sakabe, S., Tsumagari, K., Yamashita, K., IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion EC-2 439 (1987)
MagNet, Infolytica Corporation, Version 7.1.3, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2011
Archambeault, B., Connor, S., Duffy, A.P., Comparing FSV and human responses to data comparisons, in International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC, Chicago, USA, 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 284–289Google Scholar
Drozd, A.L., Selected methods for validating computational electromagnetic modeling techniques, in International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC, 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 301–306Google Scholar
Jauregui, R., Silva, F., in Numerical Analysis – Theory and Application, edited by Awrejcewicz, J., (InTech, 2011)Google Scholar
Rajamani, V., Bunting, C.F., Orlandi, A., Duffy, A., in Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, (IEEE, Albuquerque, USA, 2006), pp. 601–604Google Scholar
IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Society, IEEE standard for validation of computational electromagnetics computer modeling and simulations (IEEE std 1597.1™, 2008)
Gawron, V.J., Human Performance Measures Handbook (CRC Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Calleecharan, Y., Aidanpää, J.-O., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 225, 2076 (2011)
Calleecharan, Y., Aidanpää, J.-O., IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 5, 231 (2011)CrossRef
Division for Electricity, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala Universitet, SwedenPubMed
Dorrell, D.G., Thomson, W.T., Roach, S., IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 33, 24 (1997)CrossRef
DATAPLOT, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Version 5/02/06
GCEM Validation Tool (GVT), Grup de Compatibilitat Electromagnètica (GCEM), DEE Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, Version 3.0.3, November 2012, http://www.upc.edu/web/gcem/
Jauregui, R., Rojas-Mora, J., Silva, F., Study of transient phenomena with feature selective validation method, in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, Marrakesh, Morocco, 2011, Vol. 7 , pp. 286–290Google Scholar
Coleby, D., Duffy, A., The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 21, 540 (2002)CrossRef
Duffy, A., Sasse, H., in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, Marrakesh, Morocco, 2011, Vol. 7, pp. 191–195Google Scholar
Jauregui, R., Silva, F., Orlandi, A., Sasse, H., Duffy, A., Factors influencing the successful validation of transient phenomenon modelling, in Asia-Pacific Electromagnetic Compatibility Symposium and Technical Exhibition Beijing, China, 2010, pp. 2–5Google Scholar
Knockaert, J., Peuteman, J., Catrysse, J., Belmans, R., IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2, 244 (2008)CrossRef