Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T02:24:09.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unions and the organising turn: Reflections after 20 years of Organising Works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Edmund Heery
Edmund Heery*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, UK
*
Edmund Heery, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The launch of Organising Works 20 years ago was a key event, not just in the history of Australian trade unions but on a global scale. It marked the beginning of what might be termed the ‘organising turn’, a shift across the international trade union movement towards the greater prioritisation of union organising. This article reviews the 20-year experience of the turn, reflecting upon three of its core attributes. The first is the origin of much activity at the apex of the official trade union movement and the consequences that flow from this point of origin. The second is the emphasis on diversity, with a particular priority in recent times in trying to organise low-wage migrant workers in precarious employment. The final attribute can be labelled ‘neo-syndicalism’. This term refers to a switch towards the ‘internal’ renewal of trade unions and in this regard can be counterposed to attempts at revitalisation that focus on rebuilding relations with government and employers. The article concludes by arguing that organising can and must remain central to union strategy for renewal in Australia and beyond.

Keywords

J51J53J58Collective bargainingcommunity organisinglow-paid workerspartnership unionismsocial movement unionismsyndicalismtrade unionsunion renewalunion revitalisation
Type
Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4: Special Collection: Union Organising and Revitalisation , December 2015 , pp. 545 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackers, P (2015) Trade unions as professional associations. In: Johnstone, S, Ackers, P (eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar
Adler, LH, Tapia, M, Turner, L (eds) (2014) Mobilizing against Inequality: Unions, Immigrant Workers and the Crisis of Capitalism. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aleks, R (2015) Estimating the effects of ‘change to win’ on union organising. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 68(3): 584–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnholtz, J, Ibsen, CL, Ibsen, F (2014) Importing low-density ideas to high-density revitalization: the ‘organizing model’ in Denmark. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 1 October 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X14549034.Google Scholar
Badigannavar, V, Kelly, J (2011) Partnership and organising: an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy 32(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Bramble, T (2008) Trade Unionism in Australia: A History from Flood to Ebb Tide. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, K, Juravich, T (1998) It takes more than house-calls: organising to win with a comprehensive union-building strategy. In: Bronfenbrenner, K, Friedman, S, Hurd, RW, et al . (eds) Organising to Win: New Research on Union Strategies. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Carter, B (2000) Adoption of the organising model in British trade unions: some evidence from Manufacturing, Science and Finance (MSF). Work, Employment & Society 14(1): 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S (2009) Opening Pandora’s Box: the paradox of institutionalised. In: Gall, G (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R (2001) Getting organised? A white collar union responds to membership crisis’. Journal of Industrial Relations 43(4) 422–437.Google Scholar
Cooper, R (2003) Peak council organising at work: ACTU strategy 1994–2000. Labour & Industry 14(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, M (2009) Cleanstart – fighting for a fair deal for cleaners. In: Gall, G (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, G (2009) In the field: a decade of organising. In: Daniels, G, Mcllroy, J (eds) Trade Unions in a Neoliberal World. London: Routledge, pp. 254–282.Google Scholar
Delp, L, Quan, K (2002) Homecare worker organising in California: an analysis of a successful strategy. Labor Studies Journal 27(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early, S (2013) Going global at T-mobile. In: Early, S (ed.) Save Our Unions: Dispatches from a Movement in Distress. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 122–139.Google Scholar
Fine, J (2006) Worker Centers: Organising Communities on the Edge of the Dream. Ithaca, NY and London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, I (2009) ‘Polish migrant workers in the North - new communities, new opportunities?’ In: McBride, J, Greenwood, I (eds) Community Unionism: A Comparative Analysis of Concepts and Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 93–118.Google Scholar
Heery, E, Simms, M (2008) Constraints on union organising in the United Kingdom. Industrial Relations Journal 39(1): 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heery, E, Simms, M, Delbridge, R, et al . (2000a) The TUC’s Organising Academy: an assessment. Industrial Relations Journal 31(5): 400–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heery, E, Simms, M, Simpson, D, et al . (2000b) Organising unionism comes to the UK. Employee Relations 22(1): 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heery, E, Simms, M, Delbridge, R, et al . (2003) Trade union recruitment policy in Britain. In: Gall, G (ed.) Union Organizing: Campaigning for Trade Union Recognition. London: Routledge, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
Hickey, R, Kuruvilla, S, Lakhani, T (2010) No panacea for success: member activism, organising, and union renewal. British Journal of Industrial Relations 48(1): 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holgate, J (2015) Community organising in the UK: a ‘new’ approach for trade unions? Economic and Industrial Democracy 36(3): 431–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, S (2015) The case for workplace partnership. In: Johnstone, S, Ackers, P (eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–174.Google Scholar
Katz, HC (2001) Afterword: whither the American labor movement? In: Turner, L, Katz, HC, Hurd, RW (eds) Rekindling the Movement: Labor’s Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 339–349.Google Scholar
Kelly, J (2004) Social partnership agreements in Britain: labor cooperation and compliance. Industrial Relations 43(1): 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, TA, Eaton, AE, McKersie, RB, et al . (2009) Healing Together: The Labor-Management Partnership at Kaiser Permanente. Ithaca, NY and London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Mareschal, PM (2007) How the West was won: an inside view of the SEIU’s strategy and tactics for organising home care workers in Oregon. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 10(3): 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, R (2006) L.A. Story: Immigrant Workers and the Future of the U.S. Labor Movement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Milkman, R (2014) Introduction: towards a new labor movement? Organising New York City’s precariat. In: Milkman, R, Ott, D (eds) New Labor in New York: Precarious Work and the Future of the Labor Movement. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, R, Ott, D (2014) New Labor in New York: Precarious Work and the Future of the Labor Movement. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, R, Voss, K (2004) Introduction. In: Milkman, R, Voss, K (eds) Rebuilding Labor: Organising and Organisers in the New Union Movement. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Moody, K (2009) Union organising in the US: new tactics, old barriers. In: Gall, G (ed.) The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxenbridge, S (1997) Organising strategies and organising reform in New Zealand service sector unions. Labor Studies Journal 22(3): 3–27.Google Scholar
Peetz, D, Pocock, B, Houghton, C (2007) Organisers’ roles transformed? Australian union organisers and changing union strategy. Journal of Industrial Relations 49(2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, M (2015) Union organising as an alternative to partnership; or what to do when employers can’t keep their side of the bargain. In: Johnstone, S, Ackers, P (eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, M, Holgate, J (2010) Organising for what? Where is the debate on the politics of organising? Work, Employment and Society 24(1): 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, M, Holgate, J, Heery, E (2013) Union Voices: Tactics and Tensions in UK Organising. Ithaca, NY and London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Tattersall, A (2010) Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, K, Sherman, R (2000) Breaking the iron law of oligarchy: union revitalization in the American labor movement. American Journal of Sociology 106: 303–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, J, Kerr, A (2009) Transforming a trade union? An assessment of the introduction of an organising initiative. British Journal of Industrial Relations 47(1): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar