Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T11:19:41.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jocelyn PixleyGC Harcourt (eds), Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 2013; xvii + 329 pp.: 9781137302946, RRP GBP74.

Review products

Jocelyn Pixley GC Harcourt (eds), Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money: Mutual Developments from the Work of Geoffrey Ingham. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 2013; xvii + 329 pp.: 9781137302946, RRP GBP74.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Peter Docherty
Peter Docherty*
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book reviews
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 349 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dillard, D (1987) Money as an institution of capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues 21(4): 1623–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, G (1996) Some recent changes in the relationship between economics and sociology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20(1): 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, JM (1936) The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. London: Macmillan (1973 edition, Royal Economic Society).Google Scholar
Putnam, H (2003) For ethics and economics without the dichotomies. Review of Political Economy 15(3): 395–412.Google Scholar