Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T04:13:48.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of economics: The case for an evolutionary approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Robert Neild
Robert Neild*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
*
Robert Neild, Trinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much theoretical and empirical work by economists and psychologists has shown that the neo-classical approach is defective, and economists are now looking for an alternative. Evolutionary economics is the answer. It starts from the realistic premise that society and the economy are shaped by competition, but unlike neo-classical economics, it proceeds empirically by observing and analysing what has been happening to the economy and society. It does so on the premise that a process of social selection is taking place, analogous but not identical to that of biological selection. This dynamic approach requires a revival of economic history. By reporting on, and inviting debate over, what is happening and its implications, the adoption of an evolutionary approach should help restore the moral content of economics and the surrounding social sciences. Such a change in approach would be a paradigm shift, and will take time. That it will happen is likely: in the end facts kick.

Keywords

E14Accelerating innovationdistributiondynamic economic analysisempirically based economicsevolutionary economicsneo-classical economicsparadigm shiftsocial selection
Type
Non-symposium article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 164 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boulding, KE (1981) Evolutionary Economics. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Bowles, B, Gintis, H (2011) A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, G, Harpending, H (2010) The 10,000 Explosion: How Civilisation Accelerated Human Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cunningham, W (1892) The relativity of economic doctrine. The Economic Journal 2(5): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M, Wilson, M (1988) Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C (1887 [1958]) The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882: With Original Omissions Restored (ed. Barlow, N ). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P (2007) Economics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F (2016) Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, C (2008) Systems of Innovation: Selected Essays in Evolutionary Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F (1991) The next hundred years. The Economic Journal 101(404): 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayek, FA (1974) The pretence of knowledge. Nobel Prize Lecture, 11 December. Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1974/hayek-lecture.html (accessed 18 October 2016).Google Scholar
Hayek, FA (1984) The origins and effects of our morals: a problem for social science. In: Nishiyama, C, Leube, KR (eds) The Essence of Hayek. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 318–330.Google Scholar
Heinrich, J (2016) The Secret of our Success: How Culture is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating our Species, and Making us Smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kuhn, TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neild, R (2002) Public Corruption: The Dark Side of Social Evolution. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, RR, Winter, SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, WG (1989) A Treatise on Social Theory, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, WG (1998) The Social Animal. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Runciman, WG (2009) The Theory of Social and Cultural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, JA (1947) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simon, H (2008) Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, JM (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, RM (1997) How did economics get that way and what way did it get? Daedalus 126(1): 39–58.Google Scholar
Veblen, T (1898 [2007]) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, T (1914 [1918]) The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Neild supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 153.1 KB