Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T13:20:47.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate change response: Linking research, policy and action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Patrick Troy
Patrick Troy*
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Australia
*
Patrick Troy, Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU College of Medicine, Biology & Environment, The Australian National University, Linnaeus Way, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We are now close to reaching what climate scientists advise is a ‘tipping point’ when the injuries we have visited on the planet will become self-reinforcing and produce an ecosystem that is alien to human life. The mal-distribution of consumption within and between nations is a major reason why there is little agreement on appropriate remedial action. Ensuring planetary survival while reducing inequity is made the more difficult, because the richest one-seventh of the world’s population has already reached consumption levels beyond the capacity of the planetary ecosystem to accommodate it.

Keywords

A13C82D70D90E20F02Climate change policyconsumptionenergy targetsglobal warminggrowthinter-regional equitysocial inequityurban planning
Type
Policy Reflection
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 25 , Issue 4: Symposium: A new global economics? Environment, development, equity , December 2014 , pp. 619 - 628
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrast, M, Botero, J, Martinez, J, Underkuffler, KL (2012–2013) WJP Rule of Law Index 2012–2013. Washington, DC: The World Justice Project.Google Scholar
Ahlquist, JS, Levi, M (2013) In the Interest of Others: Organisations and Social Activism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, GS, Peñalver, EM, Singer, JW (2009) A statement of progressive property. Cornell Law Review 94(4): 743–744.Google Scholar
Babie, P (2010) Private property: the solution or the source of the problem? Amsterdam Law Forum 2(2): 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonyhady, T (2000) The Colonial Earth. Carlton, VIC, Australia: Miegunyah Press.Google Scholar
Charlton, A (2011) Man Made World: Choosing Between Progress and Planet (Quarterly Essay 44, November). Collingwood, VIC, Australia: Black, Inc.Google Scholar
Cole, HSD, Freeman, C, Jahoda, M, et al . (eds) (1973) Models of Doom: A Critique of the Limits to Growth. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Deitz, S, Stern, N (2014) Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk: how Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working paper no. 180/ Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working paper no. 159. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Working-Paper-159-Dietz-and-Stern-20141.pdf (accessed 16 October 2014).Google Scholar
Future Earth (2013) Future Earth Initial Design: Report of the Transition Team. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar
Garnaut, R (2010) What if mainstream science is right?: the rout of knowledge and analysis in Australian climate change policy (and a chance of recovery?). In: Proceedings of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, Cunningham Lecture. Available at: http://www.assa.edu.au/publications/proceedings/2010_CunninghamLecture.pdf (accessed 15 October 2014).Google Scholar
Griffiths, T (2013) Weather and mind games: why can’t we talk about climate change? Griffith Review 41: 246–265.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C (2010) Requiem for a Species: Why We Need the Truth about Climate Change. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F (1978) Limits to Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker, TF, Qin, D, Plattner, G-K, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Mouginot, J, Rignot, E, Scheuchl, B (2014) Sustained increase in ice discharge from the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica, from 1973 to 2013. Geophysical Research Letters 41(5): 1576–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyal, A (1984) Clear Across Australia: A History of Telecommunications. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Naughten, B (2011) Policy on ‘catastrophic’ climate change. Journal of Australian Political Economy 67: 121–153.Google Scholar
Smith, R (2013) Capitalism and the destruction of life on earth: six theses on saving the humans. Real-World Economics Review 64: 125–161. Available at: http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue64/Smith64.pdf (accessed 16 October 2014).Google Scholar
Snow, CP (1959) The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tawney, RH (1964) Equality. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar