Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:23:17.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Procedurally Authored Performances of Mindful Practice

Theatre-for-One, Audience Labor, and Self-Optimization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

Abstract

Relaxation, when produced by participating in a theatre-for-one piece, requires work. From March to May 2020, with much of the world under a stay-at-home advisory to mitigate the spread of Covid-19, three performances carved out restorative spaces. These theatre-for-one pieces give participants rules to follow to ostensibly resist the neoliberal drive to productivity; yet those same rules structure acts of rest as productive under neoliberalism.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Astell-Burt, Caroline. 2017. “More than Touching with the Eyes: Proximity and Puppet-theatre-for-one.” Performance Research 22, 3:3841. doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2017.1346978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beller, Jonathan. 2006. The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle. Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar
Bueno, Claudio Celis. 2017. The Attention Economy: Labour, Time, and Power in Cognitive Capitalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. 2001. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crunk Feminist Collective (CFC). 2019. “Self-Care Is Crunk.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019, ed. Matthew, K. Gold and Lauren, F. Klein, 442–44. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Doran, Peter. 2017. A Political Economy of Attention, Mindfulness and Consumerism: Reclaiming the Mindful Commons. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entropy Theatre. 2020. “Welcome to Domestic Exploration #9.” Facebook, 5 May, 9:22 p.m. Accessed 6 May 2020. www.facebook.com/groups/260260204981395/permalink/281506949523387.Google Scholar
Gambuto, Julio Vincent. 2020. “Prepare for the Ultimate Gaslighting*.” Forge, 10 April. https://forge.medium.com/prepare-for-the-ultimate-gaslighting-6a8ce3f0a0e0.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goldhaber, Michael H. 1997. “The Attention Economy and the Net.” First Monday 2, 4. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/519/440.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Ed. 2016. “How to Be Mindful With a Cup of Tea.” Mindful.org, 16 November. www.mindful.org/mindful-cup-tea/.Google Scholar
Hagan, Cara. 2021. Practicing Yoga as Resistance: Voices of Color in Search of Freedom. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, Tricia. 2020. “Resources from ‘A Space to Rest’ Virtual Experience with Wa Na Wari, Central District Forum Ideas and Langston.” The Nap Ministry, 3 August. Accessed 28 October 2020. https://thenapministry.wordpress.com/2020/08/03/resources-from-a-space-to-restexperience-with-wa-na-wari-central-district-forum-ideas-and-langston/.Google Scholar
Jackson, Anthony. 1997. “Positioning the Audience: Inter-Active Strategies and the Aesthetic in Educational Theatre.” Theatre Research International 22, 1:4860.Google Scholar
Kydd, Anna. 2018. “The art of mindful tea drinking.” The Tea Curator, 13 September. Accessed 3 March 2021. https://theteacurator.co.nz/blogs/news/the-art-of-mindful-tea-drinking.Google Scholar
Lloro-Bidart, Teresa, and Semenko, Keri. 2017. “Toward a Feminist Ethic of Self-care for Environmental Educators.” The Journal of Environmental Education 48, 1:1825. doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1249324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Aryn, Myers, Natasha, and Viseu, Ana. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 45, 5:625–41. doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaeli, Inna. 2017. “Self-Care: An Act of Political Warfare or a Neoliberal Trap?” Development 60, 1–2:50–56. doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0131-8.Google Scholar
Murray, Janet H. (1997) 2017. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Michelle Sprout. 2020. “The Gift of Time During the Great Pause.” Globe Gazette, 19 April. https://globegazette.com/opinion/columnists/murray-the-gift-of-time-during-the-great-pause/article_cf44f94f-1b74-591b-9527-26f2b202405b.html.Google Scholar
Pagis, Michael. 2009. “Embodied Self-Reflexivity.” Social Psychology Quarterly 72, 3:265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sack, Daniel, ed. 2017. Imagined Theatres: Writing for a Theoretical Stage. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1973. “Drama, Script, Theatre, and Performance.” TDR 17, 3 (T59):536. doi.org/10.2307/1144841.Google Scholar
Sedgman, Kirsty. 2018. The Reasonable Audience: Theatre Etiquette, Behaviour Policing, and the Live Performance Experience. London: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder-Young, Dani. 2022. “We’re All in This Together: Digital Performances and Socially Distanced Spectatorship.” Theatre Journal 74, 1:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soloski, Alexis. 2020. “There’s No Place Like Home (Theatre).” New York Times, 16 April. www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/theatre/immersive-home-virus.html.Google Scholar
Warner, Judith. 2005. Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
White, Gareth. 2013. Audience Participation in Theatre: Aesthetics of the Invitation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerihan, Rachel. 2020. “Strange Duets: On the Genealogy and Efficacy of One-to-One Performance.” Contemporary Theatre Review 30, 1:4666. doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2019.1696318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

TDReading

Bell, Gelsey. 2021. “Profound Connectivity: The Social Life of Music during the Pandemic.” TDR 65, 1 (T249):180–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1054204320000155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar