Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:23:39.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary-care mental-health workers’ views of clinical supervision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2011

Kenneth M. McFadyen*
Affiliation:
South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust – Primary Care Mental Health, Wombourne, South Staffordshire, UK
Jurai Darongkamas
Affiliation:
South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust – Primary Care Mental Health, Wombourne, South Staffordshire, UK
Ross Crowther-Green
Affiliation:
South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust – Primary Care Mental Health, Wombourne, South Staffordshire, UK
Olivia Williams
Affiliation:
South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust – Primary Care Mental Health, Wombourne, South Staffordshire, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr K. M. McFadyen, South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust – Primary Care Mental Health, St David's House, Planks Lane, Wombourne, South Staffordshire WV5 8DU, UK. (email: [email protected])

Abstract

Clinical supervision is an essential component of psychological work with clients. This article presents views of a group of primary-care mental-health workers on the introduction of clinical supervision. A focus group interview was analysed. The key themes extracted were: the supervisor's approach that provided an educative, safe, boundaried space that allowed exploration, support and validation; the advantages and disadvantages of group supervision; helpful and unhelpful ingredients of supervision; the governance and facilitative functions of supervision; and the dangers inherent in not having supervision for both client and worker. Key recommendations are made encompassing: training in supervision and a psychological approach; encouraging theory–practice consolidation; balancing competency with curiosity; and reviewing supervision regularly. Limitations of the study are also discussed.

Type
Education and supervision
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beinart, H (2004). Models of the supervisory relationship and their evidence base. In: Supervision and Clinical Psychology: Theory, Practice and Perspectives (ed. Fleming, I. and Steen, L.), pp. 3650. London: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
BABCP (2010). (http://www.babcp.com/members-/provisional-accreditation/). British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies. Accessed January 2011.Google Scholar
Carroll, M (2008). Supervision, creativity and transformational learning. Occasional Papers in Supervision. Counselling Psychologist, 18–25.Google Scholar
Couchon, WD, Bernard, JM (1984). Effects of timing of supervision on supervisor and counselor performance. The Clinical Supervisor 2, 320.Google Scholar
Division of Clinical Psychology (2003). Policy Guidelines on Supervision in the Practice of Clinical Psychology. The British Psychological Society: Leicester, UK.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P, Shohet, R (2006). Supervision in the Helping Professions, 3rd edn. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, PJ (1985). Humanistic psychotherapy supervision: a conceptual framework. Self and Society. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 13, 6979.Google Scholar
IAPT (2008). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies. Supervision guidance (http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/supervision-2008.pdf). Accessed January 2011.Google Scholar
Hickey, N, Kramer, T, Garralda, E (2010). Developing the primary care mental health worker role in England. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 15, 2329.Google Scholar
Inskipp, F, Proctor, B (1993). Making the Most of Supervision: Part 1. Middlesex, UK: Cascade Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, S (2008). Is there a need for professional regulation of primary care mental health workers? Quality in Primary Care 16, 263267.Google Scholar
Milne, D (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 46, 437447.Google Scholar
Milne, D, James, I (2000). A systematic review of effective cognitive-behavioural supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 111127.Google Scholar
Milne, D, Oliver, V (2000). Flexible formats of clinical supervision: description, evaluation and implementation. Journal of Mental Health 9, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padesky, CA (1986). Developing cognitive therapist competency: teaching and supervision models. In: Frontier of Cognitive Therapy (ed. Salkovskis, P.), pp. 266292. UK: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, K, Milne, D (2010). The meaning of satisfaction with clinical supervision: is it simply getting what you want? Clinical Psychology Forum 211, 1520.Google Scholar
Roth, AD, Pilling, S, Turner, J (2010). Therapist training and supervision in clinical trials: implications for clinical practice. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 38, 291302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards DA (2010). Supervising low intensity workers in high volume clinical environments. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Richards, D. A., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., Kavanagh, D., Klein, B., Lau, M. A., Proudfoot, J., Ritterband, L., White, J., Williams, C.), pp. 129136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M, Rosairo, M (2008). Low-intensity workers: lessons learnt from supervising primary care mental health workers and dilemmas associated with such roles. Mental Health in Family Medicine 5, 237245.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S, Richards, K (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counsellors and therapists, their practice and their clients. A systematic review of the literature. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 7, 5465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.