Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:23:48.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LGBQ adults’ experiences of a CBT wellbeing group for anxiety and depression in an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service: a qualitative service evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2021

Christopher E. M. Lloyd Open the ORCID record for Christopher E. M. Lloyd [Opens in a new window] ,
Katharine A. Rimes Open the ORCID record for Katharine A. Rimes [Opens in a new window]  and
David G. Hambrook Open the ORCID record for David G. Hambrook [Opens in a new window]
Christopher E. M. Lloyd
Affiliation:
London Metropolitan University, London, UK University of Derby, Derby, UK
Katharine A. Rimes
Affiliation:
King’s College London, London, UK
David G. Hambrook*
Affiliation:
King’s College London, London, UK Talking Therapies Southwark, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sexual minorities, including those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or queer (LGBQ) are at heightened risk of experiencing mental health problems. Nationally, treatment outcomes within England’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services are worse for sexual minority patients than for heterosexuals. An IAPT service in London developed a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group specifically for sexual minority patients to provide a safe, affirmative intervention to learn skills for overcoming depression, anxiety and stress. A qualitative online survey was emailed to all 59 service users who had completed the eight-session intervention, to explore their experiences inductively. Survey data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Themes were identified in participants’ responses in order to establish which aspects of the group intervention were deemed to be helpful and unhelpful, and to explore suggestions for group improvement. Eighteen people completed the survey (response rate 30.5%). Respondents reported that they found the CBT frame of the group useful, with the LGBQ focus experienced as particularly beneficial, often enhancing engagement with CBT concepts and tools. In addition to generic elements of group therapy that some found difficult, others reported that intragroup diversity, such as generational differences, could lead to a reduced sense of connection. Several suggestions for group improvement were made, including incorporating more diverse perspectives and examples in session content and focusing more on issues relating to intersectionality. These results provide preliminary evidence that a culturally adapted CBT group intervention developed specifically for sexual minorities is acceptable and perceived as offering something unique and helpful.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To identify the unique experiences and particular mental health disparities that LGBQ people face in life and why a culturally adapted LGBQ CBT group offers both a necessary and unique therapeutic tool to support sexual minorities.

  2. (2) To explore how a culturally adapted CBT group intervention for LGBQ people is experienced in practice, from the service user perspective. In particular, what aspects do LGBQ people find helpful, unhelpful and what might they suggest for future group improvement.

  3. (3) To consider how such CBT groups may be culturally adapted to benefit sexual minorities, including: what actions should be taken in future clinical practice to ensure improvements in the psychological treatment experiences of LGBQ people. Specifically, including the need to incorporate more inclusive and intersectional examples that engage and support recovery from psychological distress.

Keywords

groupIAPTqualitativesexual orientationservice evaluationtherapy
Type
Service Models, Forms of Delivery and Cultural Adaptations of CBT
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 13 , 2020 , e58
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

British Psychological Society (BPS) (2017). Memorandum of understanding on conversion therapy in the UK. Available from: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Memorandum%20of%20Understanding%20on%20Conversion%20Therapy%20in%20the%20UK%20%28Updated%29.pdf Google Scholar
British Psychological Society (BPS) (2019). Guidelines and Literature Review for Psychologists Working Therapeutically with Gender, Sexuality and Relationship Diversity. Available from: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20%20Files/Guidelines%20for%20psychologists%20working%20with%20gender%2C%20sexuality%20and%20relationship%20diversity.pdf Google Scholar
Foy, A. A., Morris, D., Fernandes, V., & Rimes, K. A. (2019). LGBQ+ adults’ experiences of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies and primary care counselling services: informing clinical practice and service delivery. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 12. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X19000291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government Equalities Office (2018). National LGBT Survey: Summary Report. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/722314/GEO-LGBT-Survey-Report.pdf Google Scholar
National Health Service (2015). Improving Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) equality across the NHS: a paper for the Equality and Diversity Council. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/edc1-lgbtequal-pap-20-10-15.pdf Google Scholar
National Health Service (2017). NHS England Equality and Health Inequalities Unit: Sexual Orientation Monitoring: Full Specification. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sexual-orientation-monitoring-full-specification.pdf Google Scholar
Public Health England (2015). Promoting the health and wellbeing of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/768857/PHEMSMActionPlan.pdf Google Scholar
Public Health England (2019). Improving the health and wellbeing of lesbian and bisexual women and other women who have sex with women. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/723557/improving_health_and_wellbeing_LBWSW.pdf Google Scholar
Rimes, K. A., Ion, D., Wingrove, J., & Carter, B. (2019). Sexual orientation differences in psychological treatment outcomes for depression and anxiety: national cohort study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 577. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000416 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stonewall (2018). LGBT in Britain: Health Report. Available from: https://www.stonewall.org.uk/system/files/lgbt_in_britain_health.pdf Google Scholar

References

Beck, A., Naz, S., Brooks, M., & Jankowska, M. (2019). Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Service User Positive Practice Guide. Retrieved from: https://www.nwppn.nhs.uk/resources/news/2564-launch-of-the-iapt-bame-positive-practice-guide Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Psychological Society (2017). Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. INF206/04.2017. Retrieved from: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Internet-mediated%20Research%20%282017%29.pdf Google Scholar
Elliott, M. N., Kanouse, D. E., Burkhart, Q., Abel, G. A., Lyratzopolous, G., Beckett, M. K., Schuster, M. A., & Roland, M. (2015). Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: a national survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30, 9–16. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2905-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foy, A. A., Morris, D., Fernandes, V., & Rimes, K. A. (2019). LGBQ+ adults’ experiences of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies and primary care counselling services: informing clinical practice and service delivery. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 12. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X19000291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government Equalities Office. (2018). National LGBT survey. Summary Report. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/722314/GEO-LGBT-Survey-Report.pdf Google Scholar
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma ‘get under the skin’? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 707. doi: 10.1037/a0016441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henretty, J. R., Berman, J. R., Currier, J., & Levitt, H. M. (2014). The impact of counselor self-disclosure on clients: a meta-analytic review of experimental and quasi-experimental research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson-Sharp, N. & Metcalf, H. (2016). Inequality among lesbian, gay bisexual and transgender groups in the UK: a review of evidence. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/539682/160719_REPORT_LGBT_evidence_review_NIESR_FINALPDF.pdf (accessed 7 June 2020).Google Scholar
Israel, T., Gorcheva, R., Burnes, T. R., & Walther, W. A. (2008). Helpful and unhelpful therapy experiences of LGBT clients. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 294–305. doi: 10.1080/10503300701506920 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, M., Semlyen, J., Killaspy, H., Nazareth, I., & Osborn, D. (2007). A Systematic Review of Research on Counselling and Psychotherapy for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender People. British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage publications.Google Scholar
Kronner, H.W. (2013). Use of self-disclosure for the gay male therapist: the impact on gay males in therapy. Journal of Social Service Research, 39, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronner, H.W., & Northcut, T. (2015). Listening to both sides of the therapeutic dyad: self-disclosure of gay male therapists and reflections from their gay male clients. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 22, 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LGBT Foundation (2017). Good Practice Guide to Monitoring Sexual Orientation. Retrieved from: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/lgbt-website-media/Files/b577e0cd-041a-4b10-89b6-f0f5f3384961/LGBTF%2520SOM%2520Report.pdf Google Scholar
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Digital (2017). Psychological Therapies: Annual Report on the Use of IAPT Services. Retrieved from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-andinformation/publications/statistical/psychological-therapies-annual-reports-on-the-use-of-iapt-services Google Scholar
ONS (2017). Subnational sexual identity estimates, UK: 2013 to 2015. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/sexuality/articles/subnationalsexualidentityestimates/uk2013to2015#introduction Google Scholar
Pachankis, J. E., Clark, K. A., Burton, C. L., Hughto, J. M. W., Bränström, R., & Keene, D. E. (2020). Sex, status, competition, and exclusion: Intraminority stress from within the gay community and gay and bisexual men’s mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachankis, J. E., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Rendina, H. J., Safren, S. A., & Parsons, J. T. (2015). LGB-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adult gay and bisexual men: a randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic minority stress approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 875. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000037 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra, L. A., Bell, T. S., Benibgui, M., Helm, J. L., & Hastings, P. D. (2018). The buffering effect of peer support on the links between family rejection and psychosocial adjustment in LGB emerging adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 854–871. doi: 10.1177/0265407517699713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parent, M. C., DeBlaere, C., & Moradi, B. (2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68, 639–645. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0283-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plöderl, M., & Tremblay, P. (2015). Mental health of sexual minorities. A systematic review. International Review of Psychiatry, 27, 367–385. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1083949 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, D. (2004). Anti-Oppressive social work practice with women in prison: discursive reconstructions and alternative practices. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 693–707. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimes, K. A., Ion, D., Wingrove, J., & Carter, B. (2019). Sexual orientation differences in psychological treatment outcomes for depression and anxiety: national cohort study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 577. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000416 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimes, K.A., Broadbent, M., Holden, R., Rahman, Q., Hambrook, D., Hatch, S., & Wingrove, J. (2018). Comparison of treatment outcomes between lesbian, gay, bisexual and heterosexual individuals receiving a primary care psychological intervention. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46, 332–349. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000583 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, L. E., Doctor, F., Dimito, A., Kuehl, D., & Armstrong, M. S. (2007). Can talking about oppression reduce depression? Modified CBT group treatment for LGBT people with depression. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 19, 1–15. doi: 10.1300/J041v19n01_01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Semlyen, J., King, M., Varney, J., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2016). Sexual orientation and symptoms of common mental disorder or low wellbeing: combined meta-analysis of 12 UK population health surveys. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 67. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0767-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. A., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2008). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: A Practical Guide to Method and Application. Sage.Google Scholar
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy (5th edn). New York, USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.