Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:37.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are we as good as we think we are? Self-assessment versus other forms of assessment of competence in psychotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Fiona M. Mathieson ,
Tracey Barnfield  and
Graeme Beaumont
Fiona M. Mathieson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand
Tracey Barnfield
Affiliation:
Psychology Clinic, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
Graeme Beaumont
Affiliation:
Blueprint Centre for Learning, Porirua, New Zealand
*
*Author for correspondence: Ms. F. M. Mathieson, Department of Psychological Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, PO Box 7343, South Wellington 6242, New Zealand. (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Oracle of Delphi's admonition to ‘know thyself’ may be more difficult than it seems, when it comes to self-assessment of competence in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). This paper investigates the accuracy of self-rating of competence in relation to other measures such as ‘direct’ assessment of videotaped sessions or supervisor ratings. Self-assessment of competence is something most of us do and arguably has an important role in professional development, but it may also be biased and unreliable. Two measures were developed, based on the Cognitive Therapy Scale – Revised, to assess student and supervisor assessments of competence at the start and end of a CBT training course. Competence data across a range of measures from a 5-year audit of a postgraduate CBT course is presented and the relationship between self-rated and other-rated measures explored. Results are discussed and it is suggested that trainee self-assessment, while not found in this study to be correlated with other measure of competence, may provide important information about confidence development, and areas where a trainee perceives they have strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords

CBTpsychotherapy trainingself-assessmenttherapist competence
Type
Original Research
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 43 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, J (1995). Psychologist's self-assessment of multicultural competence. Dissertation Abstracts International, Part B: Science and Engineering 56, 2850.Google Scholar
Alberts, G, Edelstein, B (1990). Therapist training: a critical review of skills training studies. Clinical Psychology Review 10, 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, MD, Mark, D, Klotz, ML, Breitenbecher, DL, Yurak, TJ, Vredenberg, DS (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 804–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, DR, Kammrath, LK (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 28, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnfield, TV, Beaumont, GR, Mathieson, FM (2007). Assessing the development of competency during post-graduate cognitive-behavioural therapy training. Journal of Cognitive Therapy: An International Quarterly 21, 140–147.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Beedie, A (2007). The ups and downs of cognitive therapy training: what happens to trainees perceptions of their competence during a cognitive therapy training course? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 35, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjork, RA (1999). Assessing our own competence: heuristics and illusions. In: Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application (ed.Gopher, D. and Koriat, A), pp. 435–459. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, I, Milne, D, James, I (1997). How are therapeutic competencies evaluated? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society (Division of Clinical Psychology). Herriot–Watt University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Blackburn, I-M, James, IA, Milne, DL, Baker, C, Standart, S, Garland, A, Reichelt, FK. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 29, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekaerts, M (1991). Subjective competence, appraisals and self-assessment. Learning and Instruction 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, D (2005). Self-insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Elks, M, Kirkhart, K (1993). Evaluation effectiveness from the practitioner perspective. Social Work 38, 554–563.Google Scholar
Ellis, MV, Ladany, N (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: an integrative review. In: Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision (ed.Watkins Jr, C. E..), pp. 447–507. NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
James, IA, Blackburn, I-M, Milne, DL, Reichfelt, FK (2001). Moderators of trainee therapists' competence in cognitive therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 40, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruger, J, Dunning, D (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladany, N, Hill, CE, Corbett, MM, Nutt, EA (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counselling Psychology 43, 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSala, MC (1997). Client satisfaction: consideration of correlates and response bias. Families in Society 78, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RR (1998). Practitioners as privileged evaluators of their own practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work 69, 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, DL, Baker, C, Blackburn, I-M, James, I, Reichelt, FK (1999). Effectiveness of cognitive therapy training. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 30, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, DL, Blackburn, I-M, James, I (1997). Patient and therapist characteristics and competence. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society. Heriot–Watt University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Scofield, ME, Yoxtheimer, LL (1983). Psychometric issues in the assessment of clinical competencies. Journal of Counselling Psychology 30, 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, N (1990). Handbook of Clinical Teaching: Exercises and Guidelines for Health Professionals who Teach Patients, Train Staff, or Supervise Students. New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mathieson supplementary material

Rating form 1.doc

Download Mathieson supplementary material(File)
File 87 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mathieson supplementary material

Rating form 2.doc

Download Mathieson supplementary material(File)
File 87.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.