Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:49:01.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Negative effects of self-help materials: three explorative studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2015

Mark Papworth*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, School of Psychology, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Aileen Ward
Affiliation:
NHS Lanarkshire, Coathill Hospital, Coatbridge, UK
Karen Leeson
Affiliation:
Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Hawkhill Business Park, Lesbury, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr M. Papworth, School of Psychology, Newcastle University, 4th Floor, Ridley Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK (email: [email protected]).

Abstract

Within the field of adult mental health, self-help is now a pivotal treatment modality. However, earlier research indicates that some individuals react negatively to this. Through three, small-scale studies, this paper explores both clinicians’ experience of harm in patients as a response to self-help materials as well as patients’ own reports. In Study 1, a postal survey was administrated to clinicians; in Study 2, semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians; and in Study 3, patients were sent a postal survey. Over 18% of clinicians indicated that they had experienced self-help materials resulting in harm to patients. The interviews uncovered four main themes: the patients’ clinical presentation, how the materials were presented within the therapeutic contact, certain personality characteristics in patients, and the characteristics of some materials. Between 12% and 24% of patients reported experience of negative effects (depending upon how this is defined), although the latter finding is limited by a small sample size. Proposals are made that are linked to best practice and it is suggested that there is a generic training need for clinicians in materials’ use.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended follow-up reading

Papworth, M (2006). Issues and outcomes associated with adult mental health self-help materials: a ‘second-order’ review or ‘qualitative meta-review’. Journal of Mental Health 15, 123.Google Scholar
Papworth, M, Marrinan, T, Martin, B, Keegan, D, Chaddock, A (2013). Low Intensity Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. London: Sage.Google Scholar

References

Adams, SJ, Pitre, NL (2000). Who uses bibliotherapy and why? A survey from an underserviced area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 45, 645–9.Google Scholar
Anderson, L, Lewis, G, Araya, R, Elgie, R, Harrison, G, Proudfoot, J, Scmidt, U, Sharp, D, Weightman, A & Williams, C (2005). Self-help books for depression: how can practitioners and clients make the right choice? British Journal of General Practice 55, 387392.Google Scholar
Barrera, M, Rosen, GM, Glasgow, RE (1981). Rights, risks, and responsibilities in the use of self-help psychotherapy. In: Preservation of Client Rights (ed. Hannah, G. T., Christian, W. P., Clark, H. P.), pp. 204220. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF (2012). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Richards, D, Farrand, P (2010). Low intensity CBT interventions: a revolution in mental health care. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Richards, D. A., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., Kavanagh, D. J., Klein, B., Lau, M. A., Proudfoot, J., Ritterband, L., White, J. & Williams, C.), pp. 318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, DM, Layard, R, Smithies, R, Richards, DA, Suckling, R, Wright, B (2009). Improving access to psychological therapy: initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites. Behaviour Research and Therapy 47, 910920.Google Scholar
Coull, G, Morris, PG (2011). The clinical effectiveness of CBT-based guided self-help interventions for anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 41, 22392252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuijpers, P (1997). Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: a meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 28, 139147.Google Scholar
Curran-Everitt, D, Benos, DJ (2004). Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 287, 307309.Google Scholar
Gellatly, J, Bower, P, Hennessy, S, Richards, D, Gilbody, S, Lovell, K (2007). What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine 37, 12171228.Google Scholar
Glasgow, RE, Rosen, GM (1978). Behavioral bibliotherapy: a review of self-help behavior therapy manuals. Psychological Bulletin 85, 123.Google Scholar
Glasgow, RE, Rosen, GM (1979). Self-help behaviour therapy manuals: recent developments and clinical usage. Clinical Behavior Therapy Review 1, 120.Google Scholar
Halliday, G (1991). Psychological self-help books – how dangerous are they? Psychotherapy 28, 678686.Google Scholar
Hirai, M, Clum, GA (2006). A meta-analytic study of self-help interventions for anxiety disorders. Behavior Therapy 37, 99111 Google Scholar
Holland, JL (1985). Professional Manual for the Self-directed Search, 3rd edn). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
IAPT (2015). Guide to evaluating self-help guidance materials for anxiety disorders and depression. Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (www.ucl.ac.uk/pwp-review/docs/PWPREVIEW-selfhelp). Accessed 31 July 2015.Google Scholar
Lambert, MJ (2005). Early response to psychotherapy: Further evidence for the importance of common factors rather than ‘placebo effects’. Journal of Clinical Psychology 61, 855869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahy, RL, Holland, SJ, McGinn, LK (2012). Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C, Pearce, J, Bisson, JI (2012). Efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry 200, 1521.Google Scholar
Martinez, R, Whitfield, G, Dafters, R, Williams, C (2008). Can people read self-help manuals for depression? A challenge for the stepped care model and book prescription schemes. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 36, 8997.Google Scholar
Michie, S, Atkins, L, West, R (2014). The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.Google Scholar
Mohr, DC, Beutler, LE, Engle, D, Sholam-Salomon, V, Bergan, J, Kaszniak, AW, Yost, E (1990). Identification of patients at risk for nonresponse and negative outcome in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58, 622628.Google Scholar
Nowicki, S, Duke, MP (1974). A locus of control scale for non-college as well as college adults. Journal of Personality Assessment 38, 136137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papworth, M (2006). Issues and outcomes associated with adult mental health self-help materials: a ‘second-order’ review or ‘qualitative meta-review’. Journal of Mental Health 15, 123.Google Scholar
Papworth, M, Marrinan, T, Martin, B, Keegan, D, Chaddock, A (2013). Low Intensity Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Richards, D, Suckling, R (2007). Doncaster Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Demonstration Site: Annual Report. York: University of York.Google Scholar
Richards, D, Whyte, M (2011). Reach Out: National Programme Student Materials to Support the Delivery of Training for Practitioners Delivering Low Intensity Interventions, 3rd edn. London: Rethink.Google Scholar
Schallow, JR (1975). Locus of control and success at self-modification. Behavior Therapy 6, 667671.Google Scholar
Scogin, FR, Floyd, M, Jamison, C, Ackerson, J, Landreville, P, Bissonnette, L (1996). Negative outcomes: What is the evidence on self-administered treatments? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57, 665667.Google Scholar
Starker, S (1988). Psychologists and self-help books: attitudes and prescriptive practices of clinicians. American Journal of Psychotherapy 17, 4484–55.Google Scholar
van Boeijen, CA, van Balkom, AJ, van Oppen, P, Blankenstein, N, Cherpanath, A, van Dyck, R (2005). Efficacy of self-help manuals for anxiety disorders in primary care: a systematic review. Family Practice 22, 192196.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.