Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:23:23.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Somatoform dissociation is unlikely to be a result of indoctrination by therapists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

E. R. S. Nijenhuis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit at Amsterdam, Valeriusplein 9, 1075 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R. van Dyck
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit at Amsterdam, Valeriusplein 9, 1075 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
O. van der Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
P. Spinhoven
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Mertkey, H. (1997) Tests of ‘dissociation’ and mood disorder (letter). British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijenhuis, E. R. S., Spinhoven, P., van Dyck, R., et al (1996) The development and the psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20). Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184. 688689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijenhuis, E. R. S., Spinhoven, P., van Dyck, R., et al (1997) Dissociative pathology discriminates between bipolar mood disorder and dissociative disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.