Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T01:46:34.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Meals as a Reinforcing Event in a Token Economy Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

P. J. Higson ,
P. A. Woods ,
M. M. Tannahill  and
N. C. Ellis
P. J. Higson
Affiliation:
North Wales Hospital, Denbigh, Clwyd LL16 5SS
P. A. Woods
Affiliation:
Bryn-y-Neuadd, Llanfairfechan, Gwynedd
M. M. Tannahill
Affiliation:
North Wales Hospital, Denbigh, Clwyd
N. C. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Items such as meals have frequently been used as back-up events in Token Economy Programmes (TEPs) because of their supposed reinforcing effectiveness. However, despite the dubious ethical questions that this raises, there is little research evidence to support the necessity for their use in TEP's with hospitalised chronic mentally ill patients. The effects of introducing meals as a ‘free’ item on patients' performance of a number of target behaviours were investigated in a TEP where they had previously been scheduled as a back-up event. While ‘free’ meals produced a slight increase in the actual number of meals eaten, there were no systematic effects on patients' performance of the target behaviours.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 147 , Issue 2 , August 1985 , pp. 170 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayllon, T (1963) Intensive treatment of psychotic behaviour by stimulus satiation and food reinforcement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 53–61.Google Scholar
Ayllon, T & Azrin, N. H. (1968) The Token Economy: A Motivational System for Therapy and Rehabilitation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Ayllon, T & Houghton, E. (1962) Control of the behavior of schizophrenic patients by food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 343–352.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. & Jenkins, G. M. (1970) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden Day.Google Scholar
Cotter, L. H. (1967) Operant conditioning in a Vietnamese mental hospital. American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 23–38.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. & Glass, G. V. (1978) Analysis of interrupted time series experiments In Single Subject Research: Strategies for Evaluating Change, (ed. Kratochwill, T. R.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. Mcfall, R. M. & Barnett, J. T. (1969) Design and analysis of research using time series. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 299–306.Google Scholar
Hersen, M. & Barlow, D. H. (1978) Single Case Experimental Design: Strategies for Studying Behaviour Change. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
HMSO (1973) Report of a Professional Investigation into Medical and Nursing Practices on certain wards at Napsbury Hospital, Near St. Albans. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1980) Report of the Joint Working Party to Formulate Ethical Guide-lines for the Conduct of Programmes of Behaviour Modification. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. Innis, N. K. (1981) Ethics of behavior modification: Behavioral and medical psychology. Social Science Medicine, 15F, 69–73.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (1977) The Token Economy: A Review and Evaluation. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Lucero, R. H., Vail, D. J. & Scherber, J. (1968) Regulating ope rant-conditioning programmes. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 53–54.Google Scholar
Schaefer, H. H. & Martin, P. L. (1966) Behavioral therapy for “apathy” of hospitalised schizophrenics. Psychological Reports, 19, 1147–1158.Google Scholar
Stolz, S. B. (1978) Ethics of social and educational interventions: Historical context and a behavioral analysis In Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis. (eds. Catania, C. and Brigham, T.), New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Wexler, D. B. (1973) Token and taboo: Behavior modification, token economies, and the law. California Law Review, 61, 81–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexler, D. B. (1975) Reflections on the legal regulation of behavior modification in institutional settings. Arizona Law Review, 17, 132–143.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Winkler, R. C. (1971) The relevance of economic theory and technology to token reinforcement systems. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 81–88.Google Scholar
Winkler, R. C. (1972) A theory of equilibrium in token economies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 79, 169–173.Google Scholar
Winkler, R. C. (1973) An experimental analysis of economic balance, savings and wages in a token economy. Behavior Therapy, 4, 22–40.Google Scholar
Woods, P. A., Higson, P. J. & Tannahill, M. M. (1984) Token economy programmes with chronic psychotic patients: The importance of direct measurement and objective evaluation for long term maintenance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22, 41–51.Google Scholar
Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F. Supp. 373, 344 F. Supp. 387 (M. D. Ala. 1972) affirmed sub. nom. Wyatt v Aderbolt, 503 F. 2d 1305 (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.