Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:32:48.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Brain Measurements in Chronic Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Randall Rosenthal  and
Llewellyn B. Bigelow
Randall Rosenthal
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, Saint Elizabeths Hospital, Washington D.C., 20032
Llewellyn B. Bigelow
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, Saint Elizabeths Hospital, Washington D.C., 20032
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite extensive gross and microscopic scrutiny, no consistent pathological findings have emerged from studies of autopsy material from schizophrenic patients. Dunlap (1924) carried out the first controlled study involving schizophrenic and control brains and concluded that ‘there was not even a suspicion of consistent organic brain disease as a basis for the psychosis of schizophrenia’. More recently both Wolf and Cowen (1952), and Weinstein (1954), reviewed the neuropathological literature and concluded that there were no consistent findings at autopsy that could be construed as characteristic of schizophrenia. These authors felt that earlier claims were based on failure to appreciate the range of normal variation in the brain as well as a failure to include an adequate control population in the study.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 121 , Issue 562 , September 1972 , pp. 259 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunlap, C. B. (1924). “Dementia praecox: some preliminary observations on brains from carefully selected cases, and a consideration of certain sources of errors.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 80, 403–410.Google Scholar
Elliott, F. A. (1969). “The corpus callosum, cingulate gyrus, septum pellucidum, septal area, and fornix.” In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 2, 758–765 (ed. Vinkent and Bruyn), New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1965). “Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man.” Brain, 88, Part II, 237–294; Part III, 585–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1937). The Prognosis in Schizophrenia and the Factors Influencing the Course of the Illness. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W., Gazzaniga, M. S., and Bogen, J. E. (1969). “Inter-hemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemisphere disconnection.” In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 4, 273–289 (ed. Vinkent and Bruyn), New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Weinstein, M. R. (1954). “Histopathological changes in the brain in schizophrenia.” Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 71, 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, A., and Cowen, D. (1952). “Histopathology of schizophrenia and other psychosis of unknown origin.” In: The Biology of Mental Health and Disease (Milbank Memorial Fund Conference), 469–86, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.