Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:33:06.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychiatric Practice in Great Britain and America: A Comparative Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Brian Cooper  and
Alexander C. Brown
Brian Cooper
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, S.E.5
Alexander C. Brown
Affiliation:
The Welsh National School of Medicine, Cardiff. (New York State Mental Health Research Unit, Syracuse, N.Y., U.S.A.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The methods of treatment employed for most forms of psychiatric disorder are still largely empirical. Furthermore, they are subject to powerful socio-cultural influences. Hence, it is not surprising that examination of medical practice in different countries reveals wider variation in the treatment of psychiatric disorder than in that of most other forms of morbidity (Shepherd, 1962). To establish the patterns of variation, and to assess their importance, it is necessary to develop techniques which permit direct comparison between the therapeutic practices of representative national groups of psychiatrists. This cannot be an easy matter, since in addition to difficulties of language and protocol there are problems specific to the subject of enquiry. There is as yet no internationally accepted nomenclature for psychiatric disorders, and perusal of the available prevalence statistics suggests that there must be considerable variation in the diagnostic criteria recognized by clinical psychiatrists of different nationalities (Lin and Standley, 1962). Moreover, clinicians whose chief concern is with the treatment and management of individual patients, in part through the manipulation of inter-personal relations, may be reluctant to accept any simple, mutually exclusive classification of their therapeutic techniques.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 113 , Issue 499 , June 1967 , pp. 625 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1963). Psychiatric Manpower Bulletin, No. 1. Washington, D.G. Google Scholar
Bannister, D., Salmon, P., and Leiberman, D. M. (1964). “Diagnosis–treatment relationships in psychiatry: a statistical analysis.” Brit, J. Psychiat., 110, 726–732.Google Scholar
Brown, A. C. (1965). “Psychiatrists' interest in community mental health centres.” Community Mental Health Journal, 1, 256–261.Google Scholar
Kessel, N. (1962). “Neurosis and the National Health Service.” Twentieth Century, 172, 55–65. London.Google Scholar
Kreitman, N., Sainsbury, P., Morrissey, J., Towers, J., and Scrivener, J. (1961). “The reliability of psychiatric assessment: an analysis.” J. ment, Sci., 107, 876–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T.-Y., and Standley, C. C. (1962). The Scope of Epidemiology in Psychiatry. Public Health Papers, No. 16. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Moser, C. A. (1958). Survey Methods in Social Investigation. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sargant, W. (1957). “Aim and method in treatment: twenty years of British and American psychiatry.” J. ment. Sci., 103, 699–709.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1962). “Comparative psychiatric treatment in different countries.” In: Aspects of Psychiatric Research. Edited by Richter, D., Tanner, J. M., Taylor, Lord, and Zangwill, O. L. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.