Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:38:10.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practical Aspects of the Use of Some Psychological Tests of Anxiety in a Situation of Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

P. K. Bridges
P. K. Bridges*
Affiliation:
Regional Neurosurgical Centre, Brook, General Hospital, Shooters Hill Road, London, SE18 4LW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is an increasing use of psychological tests designed to measure anxiety in both psychological and psychiatric research. Yet the theoretical bases upon which the various questionnaires have been constructed in relation to their practical application remain less than clear. For example, the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale (TMAS) (Taylor, 1955), was developed from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory as a more specific measure of manifest anxiety. The TMAS has repeatedly been shown to correlate highly significantly with the neuroticism score of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1964). The EPI is purported to measure personality in a general way in two dimensions, one of neuroticism and the other of extraversion-introversion. The association between these two tests, therefore, suggests that either both relate to a general personality variable of emotional instability, or they both more specifically measure a tendency to experience anxiety. It could also mean that these two aspects, one measured by each test, involve a personality characteristic in common.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 123 , Issue 576 , November 1973 , pp. 587 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelson, J. (1969). ‘Personality.’ Annual Review of Psychology, 20, 217–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, S., and Brackenridge, C. J. (1972). ‘Psychological, performance and biochemical factors in medical students under examination stress.’ Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, P. K., and Jones, M. T. (1968). ‘Relationship of personality and physique to plasma Cortisol levels in response to anxiety.’ Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 31, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, P. K., and Jones, M. T. (1973). ‘Relationships between some psychological assessments, body-build and physiological stress responses.’ Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B., and Scheier, I. H. (1963). Handbook for for the IPAT Anxiety Scale Questionnaire. Colorado, U.S.A.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. M., and Rosenstein, A.J. (1962). ‘An S-R Inventory of Anxiousness.’ Psychological Monographs, 76, No. 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., and Walter, C. J. S. (1969). ‘A clinical and physiological relationship between anxiety and depression.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 401–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levtnson, F., and Meyer, V. (1965). ‘Personality changes in relation to psychiatric status following orbital cortex undercutting.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 207–18.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1961). ‘The assessment of anxiety by physiological behavioral measures.’ Psychological Bulletin, 58, 234–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Opton, E. M., and Lazarus, R. S. (1967). ‘Personality determinants of psychophysiological response to stress.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarason, I. G. (1960). ‘Empirical findings and theoretical problems in the use of anxiety scales.’ Psychological Bulletin, 57, 406–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarason, I. G. and Smith, R. E. (1971). ‘Personality.’ Annual Review of Psychology, 22, 393–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. A. (1956). ‘Drive theory and manifest anxiety.’ Psychological Bulletin, 53, 303–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. A. (1955). ‘A personality scale of manifest anxiety.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285–90.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.