Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:14:07.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Contributions of Psychoanalysis to Psychiatry: Mechanism and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Denis Hill*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, S.E.5

Extract

It has often been said that no one knows what psychoanalysis is—whether it is a science, one of the humanities, a particular type of therapeutic art, a religion or a form of semantic theory (Ryecroft 1968). There are those who postpone judgement, waiting to see whether psychoanalytical theory is refuted or accepted. This raises the question of the nature of theories developed to explain human nature, as opposed to those designed for the purpose of explaining physical nature. Failure to distinguish between them leads to much confusion. Consideration of human nature leads to what is exclusively and most significantly human—human experience, so-called psychic reality, a phenomenon unique to human beings, but shared to a certain extent by them, and capable of communication between them. Physical nature, both organic and inorganic, is of a different order of abstraction. Psychic reality, which cannot be directly perceived through the physical senses, is only directly experienced in the self, but can be communicated by language—and can be inferred from observation. Physical reality can only be perceived through the physical senses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Vol. I Attachment. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
Guntrip, H. (1967). The concept of psychodynamic science. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 48, 32.Google ScholarPubMed
Home, H. J. (1967). “The concept of mind.’ Int.J. Psycho-Anal., 47, 42.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. B. (1967). The Art of the Soluble. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rycroft, C. (1968). Psychoanalysis Observed. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Sandler, J. (1962). ‘Research in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psycho.-Anal., 43, 287.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.