Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:55.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

North Staffordshire Community Beds Study: Longitudinal evaluation of psychiatric in-patient units attached to community mental health centres

2: Impact upon costs and resource use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Alan Haycox ,
Louise Unsworth ,
Keith Allen ,
Richard E. Hodgson ,
Martyn Lewis  and
Anthony P. Boardman
Alan Haycox*
Affiliation:
Prescribing Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool
Louise Unsworth
Affiliation:
Prescribing Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool
Keith Allen
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire
Richard E. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire
Martyn Lewis
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire
Anthony P. Boardman
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Psychiatry, The Guy's, Kings College and St Thomas' Hospitals' Medical and Dental School
*
Dr A. P. Boardman, Academic Department of Psychiatry, 5th Floor, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Hospital, London SEI 9RT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Innovative approaches to the provision of psychiatric care must justify their ability to improve the quality of life within the resource constraints imposed on psychiatry.

Aims

To examine the average costs per patient of the experimental and control group services.

Method

An individual patient costing methodology that identified, measured and valued all public and private resources.

Results

The experimental group was more likely to remain in contact with services over a 12-month period, had fewer acute readmissions and spent less time in acute in-patient units. There were significantly different levels and patterns of resource consumption between the groups and between the two separate catchment areas.

Conclusion

The cost analysis should be assessed in the context of the previous outcome analysis. It is likely, but not inevitable, that such units will increase the overall costs of care provision; this largely depends on the effectiveness with which such units are integrated into existing care provision.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 175 , Issue 1 , July 1999 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

See Part I. pp. 70–78, this issue.

Declaration of interest

Support received from the North Staffordshire Health Authority and the Combined Health Care North Staffordshire NHS Trust.

References

Beech, B. (1997) Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi-disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community health centres over the course of the next two years. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, A. P., Hodgson, R. E., Lewis, M., et al (1999) North Staffordshire Community Beds Study: longitudinal evaluation of psychiatric in-patient units attached to community mental health centres. I: Methods, outcome and patient satisfaction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, A. & Hillier, V. (1979) A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grey, A. M., Marshall, M., Lockwood, A., et al (1997) Problems in conducting economic evaluation alongside clinical trials: lessons from a study of case management for people with mental disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haycox, A. (1994) The Costs and Benefits of Community Care, a Case Study Aldershot: Avebury Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, C., Bridges, K., Goldberg, D., et al (1907) The evaluation of a hostel ward. A controlled study using modified cost-benefit analysts. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, J. L. (1903) Client satisfaction with mental health treatment: methodological considerations in assessment. Evaluation Review, 7, 729–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheck, R., Neale, M. & Friemen, L. (1995) Issues in estimating the costs of innovative mental health programs. Psychiatrie Quarterly, 66, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schene, A. H. & van Wijngaarden, B. (1993) Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wright, K., Haycox, A. & Leedhem, I. (1994) Evaluating Community Care. Services for People with Learning Difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wykes, T. (1995) The toxicity of community care. In Community Psychiatry in Action: Analysis and Prospects (eds P. Tyrer & F. Creed), pp. 97–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.