Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T01:48:50.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mental Health Residential Care Study: Classification of Facilities and Description of Residents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul Lelliott ,
Bernard Audini ,
Martin Knapp  and
Daniel Chisholm
Paul Lelliott*
Affiliation:
Royal College of Psychiatrists' Research Unit, London
Bernard Audini
Affiliation:
Royal College of Psychiatrists' Research Unit, London
Martin Knapp
Affiliation:
Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Canterbury, Kent
Daniel Chisholm
Affiliation:
Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
Dr Paul Lelliott, Director, Royal College of Psychiatrists' Research Unit, 11 Grosvenor Crescent, London SW1X 7EE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The NHS is no longer a virtual monopoly provider of mental health residential care. This makes it difficult to assess the volume, range and adequacy of local provision.

Method

Local data collectors used standard instruments to collect detailed information about 368 facilities (with 1951 residents) providing mental health residential care in eight districts. Because local definitions were inconsistent, facilities were reclassified on the basis of facility size and extent of day and night cover. The eight categories of accommodation are compared on levels of staffing, staff qualifications and the characteristics of their residents.

Results

There was a nearly threefold variation between districts in the total number of residential places available per unit of population, and even greater variation in the number of places with 24-hour waking cover. Most residents have long-term, severe mental illness and severe impairment. Long-stay wards accommodate people who pose greater risk of violence than do the two types of non-hospital facility with 24-hour waking cover (P<0.001). The former also employ a much greater proportion of staff with formal care qualifications and, in particular, nursing qualifications than the latter (49% v. 15%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

It is suggested that one consequence of the diversification in provision of mental health residential accommodation has been a relative reduction in the proportion of provision available to the most severely disabled. This might apply particularly to those who pose a risk of acting violently.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 169 , Issue 2 , August 1996 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clifford, P. (1993) FACE Profile. Available from the Quality Development Unit, Abbey Orchard House, 4 Abbey Orchard Street, London SW1P 2JJ.Google Scholar
Clifford, P., Charman, A., Webb, Y., et al (1991) Planning for community care: the Community Placement Questionnaire. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 193–211.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A., Field, V. & Lindesay, J. (1992) Who is Providing What? Information about UK Residential Care Provision for People with Mental Health Problems. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 134 138 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., Beecham, J. K., Knapp, M. R. J., et al (1994) The costs of accommodation and care: community provision for former long-stay hospital in-patients. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 243, 301–310.Google Scholar
House of Commons Health Committee (1994) Memorandum from the Department of Health on Public Expenditure on Health and Personal Social Services. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Jarman, B. (1983) Identification of underprivileged areas. British Medical Journal, 286, 1705–1709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, M. R. J., Cambridge, P., Thomason, C., et al (1992) Care in the Community: Challenge and Demonstration. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lelliott, P. & Wing, J. (1994) National audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. 2: Impact on services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 160–269.Google Scholar
Lelliott, P., & Wing, J. & Clifford, P. (1994) National audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. 1: Method and description of the cohort. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 170–178.Google Scholar
MILMIS Project Group (1995) Monitoring inner London mental illness services. Psychiatric Bulletin, 19, 276–280.Google Scholar
Powell, R. B., Hollander, D. & Tobiansky, R. I. (1995) Crisis in admission beds. A four year survey of the bed state of Greater London's acute psychiatric units. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 765–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wykes, T., Sturt, E. & Creer, C. (1982) Practices of day and residential units in relation to the social behaviour of attenders. Psychological Medicine (monograph suppl.), 15 27.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.