Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-12T08:56:28.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds

I. Aetiology and Psychopathology in the Light of Attachment Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John Bowlby
John Bowlby*
Affiliation:
Tavistock Clinic, Belsize Lane, London NW3 5BA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An account is given of attachment theory as a way of conceptualizing the propensity of human beings to make strong affectional bonds to particular others and of explaining the many forms of emotional distress and personality disturbance, including anxiety, anger, depression and emotional detachment, to which unwilling separation and loss give rise. Though it incorporates much psychoanalytic thinking, many of its principles derive from ethology, cognitive psychology and control theory. It conforms to the ordinary criteria of a scientific discipline.

Certain common patterns of personality development, both healthy and pathological, are described in these terms, and also some of the common patterns of parenting that contribute to them.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 130 , Issue 3 , March 1977 , pp. 201 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967) Infancy in Uganda: Infant Care and the Growth of Attachment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969) Object relations, dependency and attachment: a theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M. & Stayton, D. J. (1971) Individual differences in strange-situation behaviour of one-year-olds. In The Origins of Human Social Relations (ed. Schaffer, H. R.), pp 17–32. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M. & Stayton, D. J. (1974) Infant-mother attachment and social development: ‘socialization’ as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In The Integration of a Child into a Social World (ed. Richards, M. P. M.), PP 99–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bischof, N. (1975) A systems approach toward the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 46, 801–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blurton-Jones, N. (ed.) (1972) Ethological Studies of Child Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1958) The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1961) Childhood mourning and its implications for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 481–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss. Volume I. Attachment. London: Hogarth Press; New York: Basic Books (also in Penguin edition, 1971).Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1973) Attachment and Loss. Volume II. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. London: Hogarth Press; New York: Basic Books (also in Penguin edition, 1975).Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1975) Attachment theory, separation anxiety and mourning. In American Handbook of Psychiatry (second edition) (ed. Arieti, S.), Vol 6, pp 290–308. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Erdelyi, M. H. (1974) A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81, 1–25.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950) Childhood and Society. New York: Norton (revised edition 1963); London: Hogarth, 1965; Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952) Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, J. L. (ed.) (1972) Attachment and Dependency. Washington: V. H. Winston.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1958) The nature of love. American Journal of Psychology, 13, 673–85.Google Scholar
Heinicke, C. & Westheimer, I. (1965) Brief Separations. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, A. S. (1974) Care-eliciting behaviour in man. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 159, 172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinde, R. A. (1970) Animal Behavior: a Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology (second edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1974) Biological Bases of Human Social Behavior. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jersild, A. T. (1947) Child Psychology (third edition). Staples Press.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1948) Contributions to Psychoanalysis, 1921–1945. London: Hogarth Press; New York: Hillary.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1951) The Twenty-Fifth Maudsley Lecture. Henry Maudsley: his work and influence. Journal of Mental Science, 97, 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E. E. & Masters, J. C. (1970) Attachment and dependency. In Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology (third edition) (ed. Mussen, P. H.). New York and London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. (1965) Bereavement and mental illness. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 38, 1–26.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. (1971a) Psycho-social transitions: a field of study. Social Science and Medicine, 5, 101–15.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. (1971b) The first year of bereavement: a longitudinal study of the reactions of London widows to the death of their husbands. Psychiatry, 33, 444–67.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. (1972) Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Adult Life. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Parkes, C. M. (1973) Factors determining the persistence of phantom pain in the amputee. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 17, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, J. & Robertson, J. (1967–72) Young Children in Brief Separation. Film series. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1965) The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.