Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:05:22.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of Psychosocial Factors on the Conduct of Combined Drug and Psychotherapy Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

W. N. Stone
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
B. L. Green
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
G. C. Gleser
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
R. M. Whitman
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
B. B. Foster
Affiliation:
Veterans Administration Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

Summary

The effect of attitudes of therapists, patients and researchers on the conduct and outcome of combined drug and psychotherapy research was examined in a brief crisis-oriented psychotherapy clinic. Seventy-seven consecutive patients were given one of two anti-anxiety drugs or a placebo in conjunction with the typical psychoanalytically-oriented treatment used in the clinic. The therapists' attitudes favouring psychotherapy over drug therapy (and psychotherapy research) were clearly conveyed to the patients. Indicative of this are the following: (a) 82 per cent of the patients dropped out of drug taking, although a similar percentage remained in treatment; (b) only a third of the patients perceived it as being important to their therapists that they should take medication; (c) 87 per cent of the patients were rated as improved; and 75 per cent of patients completing forms considered that most or all of their improvement was attributable to talking.

The research team, made up of members of the same department who therefore had similar values as the therapists, diligently collected outcome data, but ignored its responsibility to enforce drug-related portions of the protocol. Overall, patients remained in therapy, improved and participated in completing forms, so that only the research goals of combined therapy were thwarted, while traditional clinic service and training goals proceeded as usual.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gottschalk, L. A., Mayerson, P., & Gottlieb, A. A. (1967) Prediction and evaluation of outcome in an emergency brief psychotherapy clinic. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 144, 7796.Google Scholar
Green, B. L., Gleser, G. C., Stone, W. N. & Seifert, R. F. Relationships among diverse measures of psychotherapy outcome. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Honigfield, G. (1964) Non-specific factors in treatment. II: Review of social-psychological factors. Diseases of the Nervous System, 25, 225–39.Google Scholar
Koegler, R. R. & Brill, N. Q. (1967) Treatment of Psychiatric Outpatients. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Macleod, J. A. & Tinnin, L. W. (1966) Special Service Project. Archives of General Psychiatry, 15, 190–7.Google Scholar
Malan, D. H. (1973) The outcome problem of psychotherapy research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 719–29.Google Scholar
Newton, P. M. & Levinson, D. J. (1973) The work group within the organization: A sociopsychological approach. Psychiatry, 36, 115–41.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Rice, A. K. (1969) Individual, group and intergroup process. Human Relations, 22, 565–84.Google Scholar
Rickels, K. (1968) Non-specific factors in drug therapy of neurotic patients. In Non-Specific Factors in Drug Therapy (ed. Rickels). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Stone, W. N., Stein, L. S. & Green, B. L. (1971) Faculty and resident commitment to varieties of psychiatric treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 468–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strupp, H. H., Fox, R. E. & Lessler, K. (1969) Patients View their Psychotherapy. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, E. H., Rickels, K., Fisher, S., Park, L. C., Lipman, R. S. & Mock, J. (1966) Drug, doctor's verbal attitude and clinic setting in symptomatic response to pharmacotherapy. Psychopharmacologia, 9, 392418.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.